Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MBIN vs IBCP vs LKFN vs NBTB vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MBIN vs IBCP vs LKFN vs NBTB vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $699M | $1.63B | $2.35B | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $315M | $422M | $867M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $219M | $69M | $103M | $169M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 69.6% | 61.0% | 72.1% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 25.8% | 29.8% | 25.3% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 9.6x | 14.4x | 10.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.84B | $117M | $184M | $327M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $52M | $57M | $185M | $119M |
MBIN vs IBCP vs LKFN vs NBTB vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) | 100 | 410.8 | +310.8% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| Lakeland Financial … (LKFN) | 100 | 146.6 | +46.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBIN vs IBCP vs LKFN vs NBTB vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MBIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 338.3% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 184.6%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 11.8x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +57.0% vs LKFN's +9.0%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.3% vs MBIN's 2.7%
LKFN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MBIN's 2.8%
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.53 vs LKFN's 3.63
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs MBIN's 1.09, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs MBIN's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MBIN's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.0% vs LKFN's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
MBIN vs IBCP vs LKFN vs NBTB vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MBIN vs IBCP vs LKFN vs NBTB vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LKFN leads in 2 of 6 categories
MBIN leads 0 • IBCP leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LKFN and NBTB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MBIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 15.2x CZWI's $90M. LKFN is the more profitable business, keeping 24.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $315M | $422M | $867M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $266M | $89M | $130M | $241M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $219M | $69M | $103M | $169M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$170M | $70M | $104M | $225M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +69.6% | +61.0% | +72.1% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +25.8% | +29.8% | +25.3% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +21.7% | +24.5% | +19.5% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.6% | +22.2% | +24.6% | +25.2% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.8% | +2.3% | +23.4% | +39.5% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MBIN and IBCP each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 33% valuation discount to LKFN's 15.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs LKFN's 3.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $699M | $1.6B | $2.4B | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $764M | $1.8B | $2.5B | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.38x | 10.38x | 15.61x | 13.53x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.99x | 9.56x | 14.42x | 10.80x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.97x | 3.93x | 1.92x | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.36x | 9.39x | 13.49x | 10.35x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 2.22x | 3.87x | 2.71x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 1.41x | 2.12x | 1.21x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.96x | 15.72x | 10.75x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBIN's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs MBIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +14.2% | +14.2% | +9.5% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.3% | +1.5% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +10.2% | +11.6% | +7.9% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +2.6% | +15.8% | +2.4% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.23x | 0.24x | 0.17x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.8B | $65M | $127M | $142M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $52M | $57M | $185M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.8B | $117M | $184M | $327M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.39x | 0.91x | 0.82x | 1.05x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MBIN and CZWI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,052 for LKFN. Over the past 12 months, MBIN leads with a +57.0% total return vs LKFN's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs LKFN's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.4% | +7.2% | +12.7% | +9.3% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.0% | +12.6% | +9.0% | +9.0% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.2% | +130.6% | +48.1% | +54.1% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.7% | +63.7% | +10.5% | +29.9% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +338.3% | +184.6% | +142.7% | +102.2% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.3% | +32.1% | +14.0% | +15.5% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MBIN's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs LKFN's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.83x | 0.79x | 0.89x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.20 | $37.39 | $69.40 | $46.92 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.75 | $29.63 | $54.36 | $39.20 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +90.8% | +90.2% | +96.1% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 50.6 | 60.9 | 57.3 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 197K | 176K | 153K | 236K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
LKFN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MBIN as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", LKFN as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for MBIN (target: $55) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, LKFN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $54.50 | $38.00 | $66.00 | $46.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +3.0% | +3.2% | +3.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.29 | $1.03 | $2.00 | $1.43 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | +1.2% | +0.4% | +3.1% |
LKFN leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Analyst Outlook. 4 categories are tied.
MBIN vs IBCP vs LKFN vs NBTB vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBIN or IBCP or LKFN or NBTB or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBIN or IBCP or LKFN or NBTB or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation at 15. 6x. On forward P/E, Merchants Bancorp is actually cheaper at 9. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBIN or IBCP or LKFN or NBTB or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to +10. 5% for Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MBIN returned +338. 3% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBIN or IBCP or LKFN or NBTB or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Merchants Bancorp's 1. 09β — meaning MBIN is approximately 136% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Merchants Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MBIN or IBCP or LKFN or NBTB or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -40. 0% for Merchants Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBIN or IBCP or LKFN or NBTB or CZWI?
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
5% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKFN leads at 29. 8% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBIN or IBCP or LKFN or NBTB or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for Lakeland Financial Corporation — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBIN: 16. 5% to $54. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBIN or IBCP or LKFN or NBTB or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is MBIN or IBCP or LKFN or NBTB or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, MBIN: +338. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBIN and IBCP and LKFN and NBTB and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.