Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MBIN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MBIN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $2.35B | $699M | $2.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $867M | $315M | $1.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $219M | $169M | $69M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 72.1% | 69.6% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 25.3% | 25.8% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 10.8x | 9.6x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.84B | $327M | $117M | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $185M | $52M | $657M |
MBIN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) | 100 | 410.8 | +310.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MBIN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MBIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 338.3% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 184.6%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 10.9x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +57.0% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.53 vs WAFD's 3.55
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs MBIN's -5.7%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- NIM 3.3% vs WAFD's 2.5%
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.81 vs MBIN's 1.09, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs MBIN's -5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs MBIN's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MBIN's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.0% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
MBIN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MBIN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
WAFD leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • MBIN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and IBCP each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 4.5x IBCP's $315M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MBIN's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $867M | $315M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $266M | $241M | $89M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $219M | $169M | $69M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$170M | $225M | $70M | $226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +72.1% | +69.6% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +25.3% | +25.8% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +19.5% | +21.7% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.6% | +25.2% | +22.2% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.8% | +39.5% | +2.3% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 23% valuation discount to WAFD's 13.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $2.4B | $699M | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $2.5B | $764M | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.38x | 13.53x | 10.38x | 13.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.99x | 10.80x | 9.56x | 10.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.92x | 1.97x | 4.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.36x | 10.35x | 9.39x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 2.71x | 2.22x | 1.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 1.21x | 1.41x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.75x | 9.96x | 13.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBIN's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs MBIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +9.5% | +14.2% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.1% | +1.3% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +7.9% | +10.2% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +2.4% | +2.6% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.17x | 0.23x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.8B | $142M | $65M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $185M | $52M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.8B | $327M | $117M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.39x | 1.05x | 0.91x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MBIN and IBCP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,248 for WAFD. Over the past 12 months, MBIN leads with a +57.0% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs WAFD's 14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.4% | +9.3% | +7.2% | +11.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.0% | +9.0% | +12.6% | +28.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.2% | +54.1% | +130.6% | +51.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.7% | +29.9% | +63.7% | +22.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +338.3% | +102.2% | +184.6% | +84.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.3% | +15.5% | +32.1% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MBIN's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.89x | 0.83x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.20 | $46.92 | $37.39 | $36.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.75 | $39.20 | $29.63 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +96.1% | +90.8% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 57.3 | 50.6 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 197K | 236K | 176K | 661K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MBIN as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for MBIN (target: $55) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs MBIN's 2.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $54.50 | $46.00 | $38.00 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 12 | 11 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.29 | $1.43 | $1.03 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.8% | +3.7% |
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WAFD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
MBIN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MBIN or NBTB or IBCP or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MBIN or NBTB or IBCP or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus WaFd, Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, Merchants Bancorp is actually cheaper at 9. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MBIN or NBTB or IBCP or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to +22. 5% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MBIN returned +338. 3% versus WAFD's +84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MBIN or NBTB or IBCP or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Merchants Bancorp's 1. 09β — meaning MBIN is approximately 33% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Merchants Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MBIN or NBTB or IBCP or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -5. 7% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -40. 0% for Merchants Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MBIN or NBTB or IBCP or WAFD?
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus 16. 0% for Merchants Bancorp — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBCP leads at 25. 8% versus 19. 3% for MBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MBIN or NBTB or IBCP or WAFD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 55x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for WaFd, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBIN: 16. 5% to $54. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MBIN or NBTB or IBCP or WAFD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 8% for Merchants Bancorp (MBIN).
09Is MBIN or NBTB or IBCP or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, MBIN: +338. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MBIN and NBTB and IBCP and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.