Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MCY vs KMPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
MCY vs KMPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $5.42B | $1.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.14B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $840M | $39M |
| Gross Margin | 43.9% | 8.1% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 0.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $594M | $1.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.32B | $126M |
MCY vs KMPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury General Cor… (MCY) | 100 | 243.4 | +143.4% |
| Kemper Corporation (KMPR) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MCY vs KMPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MCY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.0%
- 127.5% 10Y total return vs KMPR's 31.6%
KMPR is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 10.9x)
- 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MCY's 1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs KMPR's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.9 vs KMPR's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs KMPR's 0.58, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MCY's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.1% vs KMPR's -50.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 28.4% vs 3.1% |
MCY vs KMPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MCY vs KMPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCY and KMPR operate at a comparable scale, with $6.1B and $4.7B in trailing revenue. MCY is the more profitable business, keeping 13.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMPR's 0.8%. On growth, MCY holds the edge at +10.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.1B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $21M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $840M | $39M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $382M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.9% | +8.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +0.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.5% | -7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -104.9% |
Valuation Metrics
KMPR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, MCY trades at a 22% valuation discount to KMPR's 12.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MCY's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KMPR's 11.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.02x | 12.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.88x | 7.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.37x | 11.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 0.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.24x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.27x | 3.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCY leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCY delivers a 36.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $1 for KMPR. MCY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMPR's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMPR scores 7/9 vs MCY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +36.5% | +1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +28.4% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.4% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$721M | $879M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $126M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $594M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 37.63x | 0.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCY five years ago would be worth $15,876 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,483 for KMPR. Over the past 12 months, MCY leads with a +74.1% total return vs KMPR's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCY at 50.8% vs KMPR's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | -24.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.1% | -50.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +243.2% | -29.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.8% | -55.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.5% | +31.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.8% | -10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MCY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCY is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMPR's 0.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCY currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs KMPR's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $100.69 | $66.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $54.00 | $27.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +44.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 208K | 813K |
Analyst Outlook
KMPR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MCY as "Hold" and KMPR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.4% upside for KMPR (target: $48) vs -8.1% for MCY (target: $90). For income investors, KMPR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.33% vs MCY's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.00 | $48.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +17.5% |
MCY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KMPR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
MCY vs KMPR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MCY or KMPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mercury General Corporation (MCY) is the stronger pick with 9.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Mercury General Corporation (MCY) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kemper Corporation (KMPR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MCY or KMPR?
On trailing P/E, Mercury General Corporation (MCY) is the cheapest at 10.
0x versus Kemper Corporation at 12. 8x. On forward P/E, Kemper Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MCY or KMPR?
Over the past 5 years, Mercury General Corporation (MCY) delivered a total return of +58.
8%, compared to -55. 2% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCY returned +127. 5% versus KMPR's +31. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MCY or KMPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mercury General Corporation (MCY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus Kemper Corporation's 0. 58β — meaning KMPR is approximately 7% more volatile than MCY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mercury General Corporation (MCY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 38% for Kemper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MCY or KMPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mercury General Corporation (MCY) is pulling ahead at 9.
4% versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mercury General Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -53. 4% for Kemper Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MCY leads at 18. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MCY or KMPR?
Mercury General Corporation (MCY) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
0% net margin versus 3. 0% for Kemper Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCY leads at 11. 1% versus 3. 3% for KMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCY leads at 33. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MCY or KMPR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kemper Corporation (KMPR) trades at 7.
8x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for Mercury General Corporation — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KMPR: 63. 4% to $48. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MCY or KMPR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kemper Corporation (KMPR) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 1. 3% for Mercury General Corporation (MCY).
09Is MCY or KMPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mercury General Corporation (MCY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), 1. 3% yield, +127. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCY: +127. 5%, KMPR: +31. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MCY and KMPR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.