Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MDU vs NI vs ATO vs SR vs NJR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
MDU vs NI vs ATO vs SR vs NJR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $4.60B | $22.54B | $30.09B | $5.05B | $5.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.81B | $6.82B | $4.88B | $2.47B | $2.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $189M | $962M | $1.35B | $358M | $341M |
| Gross Margin | 47.0% | 62.8% | 32.9% | 73.3% | 27.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 27.8% | 35.9% | 22.1% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 22.9x | 22.9x | 21.9x | 16.5x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.74B | $16.24B | $9.30B | $5.24B | $3.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $136M | $204M | $6M | $10M |
MDU vs NI vs ATO vs SR vs NJR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDU Resources Group… (MDU) | 100 | 271.7 | +171.7% |
| NiSource Inc. (NI) | 100 | 197.3 | +97.3% |
| Atmos Energy Corpor… (ATO) | 100 | 176.9 | +76.9% |
| Spire Inc. (SR) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
| New Jersey Resource… (NJR) | 100 | 158.1 | +58.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDU vs NI vs ATO vs SR vs NJR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MDU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 227.8% 10Y total return vs ATO's 179.6%
- +30.7% vs ATO's +14.1%
NI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 21.8%, EPS growth 20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 21.8% revenue growth vs SR's -4.5%
ATO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and dividends.
- 27.6% margin vs MDU's 10.5%
- 1.9% yield, 28-year raise streak, vs SR's 3.6%
SR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 0.32x
- PEG 0.66 vs ATO's 2.48
- Beta 0.06, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.32x
NJR is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 6.0% ROA vs MDU's 2.6%, ROIC 5.5% vs 4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.8% revenue growth vs SR's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 21.9x), PEG 0.66 vs 2.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.6% margin vs MDU's 10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs MDU's 0.38 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 28-year raise streak, vs SR's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.7% vs ATO's +14.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs MDU's 2.6%, ROIC 5.5% vs 4.2% |
MDU vs NI vs ATO vs SR vs NJR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MDU vs NI vs ATO vs SR vs NJR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SR leads in 1 of 6 categories
NJR leads 1 • MDU leads 1 • NI leads 0 • ATO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NI and ATO and SR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NI is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 3.8x MDU's $1.8B. ATO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDU's 10.5%. On growth, NI holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $6.8B | $4.9B | $2.5B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $503M | $3.1B | $2.5B | $864M | $727M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $189M | $962M | $1.3B | $358M | $341M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$294M | -$1.0B | -$2.0B | -$2.7B | -$527M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.0% | +62.8% | +32.9% | +73.3% | +27.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +27.8% | +35.9% | +22.1% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +14.1% | +27.6% | +14.5% | +15.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.3% | -15.0% | -40.8% | -108.1% | -23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.2% | +8.2% | +0.6% | -9.0% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +6.0% | +14.5% | +31.1% | +6.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, NJR trades at a 32% valuation discount to ATO's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SR offers better value at 0.79x vs ATO's 2.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $22.5B | $30.1B | $5.1B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.3B | $38.6B | $39.2B | $10.3B | $9.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.16x | 24.11x | 24.38x | 19.57x | 16.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.93x | 22.85x | 21.88x | 16.47x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.77x | 0.79x | 1.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.71x | 12.87x | 17.08x | 12.51x | 14.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.45x | 3.39x | 6.40x | 2.04x | 2.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.66x | 1.91x | 2.15x | 1.48x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NJR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NJR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $7 for MDU. ATO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NJR's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NI scores 7/9 vs MDU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | +8.4% | +7.7% | +10.4% | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +2.7% | +4.5% | +2.9% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +5.3% | +5.5% | +4.7% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +6.0% | +6.1% | +5.8% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 1.39x | 0.69x | 1.54x | 1.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.7B | $16.1B | $9.1B | $5.2B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $136M | $204M | $6M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $16.2B | $9.3B | $5.2B | $3.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.77x | 2.87x | 9.61x | 2.62x | 4.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MDU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NI five years ago would be worth $20,085 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,210 for SR. Over the past 12 months, MDU leads with a +30.7% total return vs ATO's +14.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDU at 29.3% vs NJR's 6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.8% | +13.0% | +8.0% | +3.8% | +21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.7% | +19.0% | +14.1% | +16.6% | +17.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.3% | +76.8% | +62.9% | +38.7% | +21.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.1% | +100.8% | +91.7% | +32.1% | +46.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +227.8% | +137.6% | +179.6% | +71.4% | +90.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.3% | +20.9% | +17.7% | +11.5% | +6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MDU and NJR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NJR is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MDU's 0.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDU currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs SR's 89.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 0.22x | -0.00x | 0.06x | -0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.83 | $48.98 | $192.51 | $95.31 | $57.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.76 | $37.22 | $149.98 | $69.94 | $43.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +96.0% | +94.5% | +89.7% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 48.8 | 46.0 | 34.0 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 3.9M | 854K | 346K | 485K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ATO and SR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MDU as "Buy", NI as "Buy", ATO as "Hold", SR as "Buy", NJR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for SR (target: $97) vs -6.5% for MDU (target: $21). For income investors, SR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs ATO's 1.90%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $49.80 | $179.00 | $97.00 | $55.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 22 | 20 | 15 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +2.4% | +1.9% | +3.6% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 28 | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.53 | $1.12 | $3.45 | $3.10 | $1.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NJR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
MDU vs NI vs ATO vs SR vs NJR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDU or NI or ATO or SR or NJR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NiSource Inc.
(NI) is the stronger pick with 21. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Spire Inc. (SR). New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MDU or NI or ATO or SR or NJR?
On trailing P/E, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the cheapest at 16.
7x versus Atmos Energy Corporation at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, New Jersey Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spire Inc. wins at 0. 66x versus Atmos Energy Corporation's 2. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MDU or NI or ATO or SR or NJR?
Over the past 5 years, NiSource Inc.
(NI) delivered a total return of +100. 8%, compared to +32. 1% for Spire Inc. (SR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDU returned +227. 8% versus SR's +71. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MDU or NI or ATO or SR or NJR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
13β versus MDU Resources Group, Inc. 's 0. 38β — meaning MDU is approximately -389% more volatile than NJR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 158% for New Jersey Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MDU or NI or ATO or SR or NJR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NiSource Inc.
(NI) is pulling ahead at 21. 8% versus -4. 5% for Spire Inc. (SR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NiSource Inc. grew EPS 20. 4% year-over-year, compared to -32. 1% for MDU Resources Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NI leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MDU or NI or ATO or SR or NJR?
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
5% net margin versus 10. 2% for MDU Resources Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATO leads at 33. 2% versus 15. 5% for MDU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SR leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MDU or NI or ATO or SR or NJR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spire Inc. (SR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus Atmos Energy Corporation's 2. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for MDU Resources Group, Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SR: 13. 4% to $97. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MDU or NI or ATO or SR or NJR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Spire Inc. (SR) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 1. 9% for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO).
09Is MDU or NI or ATO or SR or NJR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
13), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NJR: +90. 4%, MDU: +227. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MDU and NI and ATO and SR and NJR?
These companies operate in different sectors (MDU (Industrials) and NI (Utilities) and ATO (Utilities) and SR (Utilities) and NJR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MDU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ATO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NJR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.