REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MDV vs ILPT vs PLD vs IIPR vs STAG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
MDV vs ILPT vs PLD vs IIPR vs STAG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $186M | $543M | $133.81B | $1.64B | $7.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $453M | $8.74B | $263M | $864M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-623K | $-54M | $3.21B | $120M | $244M |
| Gross Margin | 3.9% | 10.9% | 67.7% | 60.3% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 33.1% | 47.0% | 46.7% | 37.9% |
| Forward P/E | 211.4x | — | 42.7x | 13.5x | 38.4x |
| Total Debt | $269M | $4.22B | $31.49B | $394M | $3.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $183M | $1.32B | $48M | $15M |
MDV vs ILPT vs PLD vs IIPR vs STAG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modiv Industrial, I… (MDV) | 100 | 114.5 | +14.5% |
| Industrial Logistic… (ILPT) | 100 | 36.4 | -63.6% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 98.8 | -1.2% |
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 30.4 | -69.6% |
| STAG Industrial, In… (STAG) | 100 | 100.0 | -0.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDV vs ILPT vs PLD vs IIPR vs STAG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MDV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, current ratio 53.46x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.6%, current ratio 53.46x
- Beta 0.46 vs ILPT's 1.53, lower leverage
ILPT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +170.2% vs IIPR's +16.6%
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 262.8% 10Y total return vs IIPR's 439.9%
IIPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 13.3%
- PEG 3.60 vs STAG's 18.83
- Lower P/E (13.5x vs 38.4x), PEG 3.60 vs 18.83
- 45.6% margin vs ILPT's -11.9%
STAG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.1%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 10.1% FFO/revenue growth vs IIPR's -13.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.1% FFO/revenue growth vs IIPR's -13.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 38.4x), PEG 3.60 vs 18.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.6% margin vs ILPT's -11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs ILPT's 1.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 13.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +170.2% vs IIPR's +16.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs ILPT's -1.0%, ROIC 4.3% vs 2.2% |
MDV vs ILPT vs PLD vs IIPR vs STAG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MDV vs ILPT vs PLD vs IIPR vs STAG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
PLD leads 1 • IIPR leads 1 • MDV leads 1 • STAG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 188.7x MDV's $46M. IIPR is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ILPT's -11.9%. On growth, STAG holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $453M | $8.7B | $263M | $864M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $30M | $306M | $6.7B | $197M | $634M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$622,999 | -$54M | $3.2B | $120M | $244M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $65M | $5.2B | $144M | $443M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +10.9% | +67.7% | +60.3% | +61.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +33.1% | +47.0% | +46.7% | +37.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | -11.9% | +36.7% | +45.6% | +28.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | +14.4% | +59.3% | +54.7% | +51.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.8% | +4.0% | +8.7% | -3.8% | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.3% | +57.6% | -24.1% | -1.0% | -34.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ILPT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.6x trailing earnings, IIPR trades at a 59% valuation discount to PLD's 35.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLD offers better value at 3.32x vs STAG's 13.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $186M | $543M | $133.8B | $1.6B | $7.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $440M | $4.6B | $164.0B | $2.0B | $10.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -57.97x | -8.15x | 35.93x | 14.58x | 26.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 211.41x | — | 42.65x | 13.49x | 38.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.32x | 3.89x | 13.10x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.18x | 14.64x | 23.44x | 10.01x | 17.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.00x | 1.21x | 16.32x | 6.16x | 8.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 0.60x | 2.34x | 0.88x | 2.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.83x | 8.96x | 27.24x | 9.37x | 18.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STAG delivers a 6.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ILPT. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILPT's 4.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MDV scores 5/9 vs IIPR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.3% | -5.9% | +5.6% | +6.4% | +6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | -1.0% | +3.3% | +5.1% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +2.2% | +3.8% | +4.3% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +3.3% | +4.8% | +5.8% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.33x | 4.69x | 0.54x | 0.21x | 0.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $254M | $4.0B | $30.2B | $346M | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $183M | $1.3B | $48M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $269M | $4.2B | $31.5B | $394M | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.03x | 0.61x | 5.27x | 6.67x | 3.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ILPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLD five years ago would be worth $13,904 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,622 for MDV. Over the past 12 months, ILPT leads with a +170.2% total return vs IIPR's +16.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILPT at 63.7% vs IIPR's 4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.5% | +49.2% | +12.5% | +19.6% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.8% | +170.2% | +40.5% | +16.6% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.6% | +339.1% | +22.2% | +15.1% | +22.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.8% | -61.1% | +39.0% | -46.9% | +26.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.8% | -40.0% | +262.8% | +439.9% | +149.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.7% | +63.7% | +6.9% | +4.8% | +7.0% |
Risk & Volatility
MDV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDV is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ILPT's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDV currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs IIPR's 93.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 1.53x | 0.74x | 0.91x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.05 | $8.19 | $145.44 | $61.40 | $39.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.97 | $2.94 | $103.02 | $44.58 | $33.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +99.5% | +99.1% | +93.3% | +97.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.1 | 72.0 | 56.9 | 56.4 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 76K | 315K | 3.1M | 297K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PLD and IIPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MDV as "Buy", ILPT as "Buy", PLD as "Buy", IIPR as "Hold", STAG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.8% upside for IIPR (target: $85) vs -9.2% for ILPT (target: $7). For income investors, IIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 13.30% vs ILPT's 1.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $7.40 | $144.43 | $84.67 | $40.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 9 | 42 | 11 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +1.5% | +2.6% | +13.3% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $0.12 | $3.74 | $7.62 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.8% | +0.1% | +0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% |
ILPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). PLD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
MDV vs ILPT vs PLD vs IIPR vs STAG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDV or ILPT or PLD or IIPR or STAG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is the stronger pick with 10. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Modiv Industrial, Inc. (MDV) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MDV or ILPT or PLD or IIPR or STAG?
On trailing P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the cheapest at 14. 6x versus Prologis, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. wins at 3. 60x versus STAG Industrial, Inc. 's 18. 83x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MDV or ILPT or PLD or IIPR or STAG?
Over the past 5 years, Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) delivered a total return of +39. 0%, compared to -63. 8% for Modiv Industrial, Inc. (MDV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +439. 9% versus MDV's -63. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MDV or ILPT or PLD or IIPR or STAG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Modiv Industrial, Inc.
(MDV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's 1. 53β — meaning ILPT is approximately 236% more volatile than MDV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MDV or ILPT or PLD or IIPR or STAG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is pulling ahead at 10. 1% versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: STAG Industrial, Inc. grew EPS 40. 4% year-over-year, compared to -247. 6% for Modiv Industrial, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MDV or ILPT or PLD or IIPR or STAG?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus -14. 7% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 33. 0% for ILPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIPR leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MDV or ILPT or PLD or IIPR or STAG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 60x versus STAG Industrial, Inc. 's 18. 83x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 211. 4x for Modiv Industrial, Inc. — 197. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IIPR: 47. 8% to $84. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MDV or ILPT or PLD or IIPR or STAG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the highest yield at 13. 3%, versus 1. 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT).
09Is MDV or ILPT or PLD or IIPR or STAG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 9% yield, +149. 2% 10Y return). Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STAG: +149. 2%, ILPT: -40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MDV and ILPT and PLD and IIPR and STAG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MDV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ILPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; STAG is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.