Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MKC vs SJM vs CHD vs KHC vs GIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Household & Personal Products
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
MKC vs SJM vs CHD vs KHC vs GIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Household & Personal Products | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $12.14B | $10.58B | $22.24B | $28.05B | $19.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.84B | $8.93B | $6.21B | $24.99B | $18.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $789M | $-1.26B | $733M | $-5.76B | $2.21B |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 33.6% | 45.1% | 33.9% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | -8.0% | 17.3% | -18.9% | 19.1% |
| Forward P/E | 15.5x | 11.0x | 25.0x | 11.6x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $4.00B | $7.76B | $2.21B | $21.22B | $15.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $96M | $70M | $409M | $2.62B | $364M |
MKC vs SJM vs CHD vs KHC vs GIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| McCormick & Company… (MKC) | 100 | 54.7 | -45.3% |
| The J. M. Smucker C… (SJM) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
| Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD) | 100 | 125.1 | +25.1% |
| The Kraft Heinz Com… (KHC) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
| General Mills, Inc. (GIS) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKC vs SJM vs CHD vs KHC vs GIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.7% yield, 27-year raise streak, vs KHC's 6.8%
SJM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, current ratio 0.81x
- Beta 0.04, yield 4.3%, current ratio 0.81x
- 6.7% revenue growth vs KHC's -3.5%
CHD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.6%, EPS growth 27.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
- 113.6% 10Y total return vs SJM's 5.6%
- +3.4% vs MKC's -33.6%
- 8.2% ROA vs SJM's -7.7%, ROIC 13.9% vs -3.4%
Among these 5 stocks, KHC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 3.64 vs MKC's 14.63
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 25.0x)
- 12.1% margin vs KHC's -23.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.7% revenue growth vs KHC's -3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs KHC's -23.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs KHC's 0.15 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 27-year raise streak, vs KHC's 6.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.4% vs MKC's -33.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.2% ROA vs SJM's -7.7%, ROIC 13.9% vs -3.4% |
MKC vs SJM vs CHD vs KHC vs GIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MKC vs SJM vs CHD vs KHC vs GIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHD leads in 2 of 6 categories
GIS leads 1 • MKC leads 0 • SJM leads 0 • KHC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CHD and GIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 4.0x CHD's $6.2B. GIS is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KHC's -23.0%. On growth, SJM holds the edge at +7.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.8B | $8.9B | $6.2B | $25.0B | $18.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | -$595M | $1.3B | -$4.0B | $3.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $789M | -$1.3B | $733M | -$5.8B | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $879M | $971M | $1.1B | $3.9B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +33.6% | +45.1% | +33.9% | +33.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | -8.0% | +17.3% | -18.9% | +19.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | -14.1% | +11.8% | -23.0% | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +10.9% | +17.2% | +15.8% | +9.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +7.0% | +0.1% | +0.8% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.0% | -9.3% | +2.2% | +11.7% | -50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, GIS trades at a 72% valuation discount to CHD's 31.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GIS offers better value at 3.04x vs MKC's 15.47x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.1B | $10.6B | $22.2B | $28.1B | $19.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.0B | $18.3B | $24.0B | $46.7B | $34.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.35x | -8.59x | 31.09x | -4.80x | 8.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.46x | 11.01x | 25.01x | 11.63x | 10.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 15.47x | — | — | — | 3.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.12x | — | 18.14x | — | 8.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.78x | 1.21x | 3.59x | 1.12x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.24x | 1.74x | 5.73x | 0.67x | 2.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.40x | 12.96x | 20.35x | 7.66x | 8.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GIS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-24 for SJM. KHC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GIS's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHD scores 7/9 vs GIS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | -24.0% | +17.4% | -13.8% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | -7.7% | +8.2% | -7.0% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | -3.4% | +13.9% | -5.5% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.7% | -4.3% | +14.4% | -6.1% | +13.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 1.28x | 0.55x | 0.51x | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $7.7B | $1.8B | $18.6B | $14.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $96M | $70M | $409M | $2.6B | $364M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.0B | $7.8B | $2.2B | $21.2B | $15.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.65x | -1.88x | 15.59x | -6.02x | 5.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHD five years ago would be worth $11,370 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,276 for MKC. Over the past 12 months, CHD leads with a +3.4% total return vs MKC's -33.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHD at 0.2% vs GIS's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.1% | +4.0% | +14.0% | -1.4% | -19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.6% | -7.5% | +3.4% | -10.5% | -29.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.8% | -28.5% | +0.7% | -30.7% | -52.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.2% | -12.0% | +13.7% | -27.2% | -25.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.9% | +5.6% | +113.6% | -50.2% | -9.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.6% | -10.6% | +0.2% | -11.5% | -21.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHD and GIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GIS is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KHC's 0.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHD currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs MKC's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 0.04x | 0.14x | 0.15x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.16 | $119.39 | $106.04 | $29.19 | $55.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $47.31 | $88.25 | $81.33 | $21.04 | $33.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.3% | +83.3% | +88.5% | +81.0% | +64.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.8 | 50.1 | 49.1 | 58.7 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 2.1M | 1.8M | 15.2M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKC and KHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MKC as "Hold", SJM as "Hold", CHD as "Buy", KHC as "Hold", GIS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.8% upside for MKC (target: $73) vs -1.2% for KHC (target: $23). For income investors, KHC offers the higher dividend yield at 6.76% vs CHD's 1.25%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.20 | $113.38 | $99.60 | $23.38 | $46.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 29 | 34 | 35 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +4.3% | +1.3% | +6.8% | +6.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 27 | 15 | 23 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.79 | $4.28 | $1.18 | $1.60 | $2.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.0% | +4.0% | +1.6% | +6.3% |
CHD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
MKC vs SJM vs CHD vs KHC vs GIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKC or SJM or CHD or KHC or GIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The J.
M. Smucker Company (SJM) is the stronger pick with 6. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 5% for The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC). General Mills, Inc. (GIS) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKC or SJM or CHD or KHC or GIS?
On trailing P/E, General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. at 31. 1x. On forward P/E, General Mills, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: General Mills, Inc. wins at 3. 64x versus McCormick & Company, Incorporated's 14. 63x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKC or SJM or CHD or KHC or GIS?
Over the past 5 years, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) delivered a total return of +13. 7%, compared to -37. 2% for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHD returned +113. 6% versus KHC's -50. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKC or SJM or CHD or KHC or GIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus The Kraft Heinz Company's 0. 15β — meaning KHC is approximately -515% more volatile than GIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 166% for General Mills, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKC or SJM or CHD or KHC or GIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The J.
M. Smucker Company (SJM) is pulling ahead at 6. 7% versus -3. 5% for The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -318. 1% for The Kraft Heinz Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHD leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKC or SJM or CHD or KHC or GIS?
Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 9% net margin versus -23. 4% for The Kraft Heinz Company — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHD leads at 17. 4% versus -18. 7% for KHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHD leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKC or SJM or CHD or KHC or GIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 64x versus McCormick & Company, Incorporated's 14. 63x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, General Mills, Inc. (GIS) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKC: 52. 8% to $73. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKC or SJM or CHD or KHC or GIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) offers the highest yield at 6. 8%, versus 1. 3% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD).
09Is MKC or SJM or CHD or KHC or GIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
03), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKC: +26. 9%, KHC: -50. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKC and SJM and CHD and KHC and GIS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MKC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SJM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CHD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KHC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; GIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.