Leisure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MMA vs FWONK vs MSGE vs SKLZ vs GENI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Internet Content & Information
MMA vs FWONK vs MSGE vs SKLZ vs GENI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Entertainment | Entertainment | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $14M | $20.83B | $3.15B | $109M | $1.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $562K | $1.02B | $1.16B | $104M | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $449M | $42M | $-70M | $-112M |
| Gross Margin | 71.4% | -18.4% | 31.5% | 87.5% | 22.9% |
| Operating Margin | -22.3% | -3.4% | 10.1% | -68.3% | -18.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 57.5x | 56.8x | — | 52.4x |
| Total Debt | $259K | $0.00 | $1.20B | $129M | $30M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $1.05B | $43M | $195M | $281M |
MMA vs FWONK vs MSGE vs SKLZ vs GENI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed Martial Arts … (MMA) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 142.5 | +42.5% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 170.1 | +70.1% |
| Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) | 100 | 107.6 | +7.6% |
| Genius Sports Limit… (GENI) | 100 | 83.5 | -16.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MMA vs FWONK vs MSGE vs SKLZ vs GENI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MMA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FWONK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.35
- 418.1% 10Y total return vs MSGE's -24.6%
- 43.8% margin vs MMA's -25.6%
- Beta 0.35 vs SKLZ's 2.57
MSGE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +83.6% vs GENI's -53.1%
Among these 5 stocks, SKLZ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GENI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 31.0%, EPS growth -63.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.50, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.56x
- Beta 1.50, current ratio 1.56x
- 31.0% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.0% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs MMA's -25.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs SKLZ's 2.57 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.6% vs GENI's -53.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.6% ROA vs MMA's -229.6% |
MMA vs FWONK vs MSGE vs SKLZ vs GENI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MMA vs FWONK vs MSGE vs SKLZ vs GENI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSGE leads in 2 of 6 categories
FWONK leads 1 • GENI leads 1 • MMA leads 0 • SKLZ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FWONK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSGE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 2060.7x MMA's $562,312. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MMA's -25.6%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $562,312 | $1.0B | $1.2B | $104M | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $231M | $245M | -$70M | -$50M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $449M | $42M | -$70M | -$112M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $279M | $289M | -$70M | $37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.4% | -18.4% | +31.5% | +87.5% | +22.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.3% | -3.4% | +10.1% | -68.3% | -18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.6% | +43.8% | +3.6% | -67.4% | -16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.1% | +27.3% | +25.0% | -67.3% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.6% | +59.4% | +53.8% | +37.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +100.0% | -123.5% | -24.7% | +33.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GENI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $20.8B | $3.2B | $109M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $19.8B | $4.3B | $43M | $924M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.54x | — | 86.64x | -1.55x | -10.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 57.49x | 56.83x | — | 52.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 23.97x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 35.48x | — | 3.35x | 1.04x | 1.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.02x | — | — | 0.97x | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.94x | 33.88x | — | 18.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGE delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-6 for MMA. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKLZ's 1.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGE scores 6/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.6% | — | +7.7% | -52.5% | -15.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | +42.6% | +1.8% | -21.8% | -11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | +8.5% | -148.3% | -16.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.6% | -0.5% | +11.0% | -34.0% | -15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | — | — | 1.15x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$1.1B | $1.2B | -$66M | -$250M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $1.1B | $43M | $195M | $281M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $259,281 | $0 | $1.2B | $129M | $30M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.87x | 3.35x | 4.43x | -7.08x | -136.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSGE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth $21,768 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $222 for SKLZ. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +83.6% total return vs GENI's -53.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGE at 24.9% vs MMA's -49.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -50.8% | -4.7% | +22.8% | +58.3% | -55.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.2% | -0.1% | +83.6% | +34.7% | -53.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | +30.5% | +94.8% | -42.7% | +17.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | +117.7% | -26.2% | -97.8% | -74.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | +418.1% | -24.6% | -96.5% | -52.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.3% | +9.3% | +24.9% | -16.9% | +5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FWONK and MSGE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKLZ's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGE currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs MMA's 17.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 0.35x | 0.94x | 2.57x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.07 | $109.36 | $69.86 | $20.00 | $13.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.35 | $80.15 | $35.31 | $2.23 | $3.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +17.8% | +85.5% | +95.5% | +34.9% | +34.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 54.6 | 67.6 | 54.4 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 446K | 2.1M | 312K | 1.2M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FWONK as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy", SKLZ as "Hold", GENI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 931.5% upside for SKLZ (target: $72) vs -0.6% for MSGE (target: $66).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.33 | $66.29 | $72.00 | $12.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 12 | 7 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +8.5% | 0.0% |
MSGE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FWONK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
MMA vs FWONK vs MSGE vs SKLZ vs GENI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MMA or FWONK or MSGE or SKLZ or GENI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE) offers the better valuation at 86. 6x trailing P/E (56. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Formula One Group (FWONK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MMA or FWONK or MSGE or SKLZ or GENI?
On forward P/E, Genius Sports Limited is actually cheaper at 52.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MMA or FWONK or MSGE or SKLZ or GENI?
Over the past 5 years, Formula One Group (FWONK) delivered a total return of +117.
7%, compared to -97. 8% for Skillz Inc. (SKLZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FWONK returned +418. 1% versus SKLZ's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MMA or FWONK or MSGE or SKLZ or GENI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Skillz Inc. 's 2. 57β — meaning SKLZ is approximately 627% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 115% for Skillz Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MMA or FWONK or MSGE or SKLZ or GENI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.
0% versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Formula One Group grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -74. 1% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GENI leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MMA or FWONK or MSGE or SKLZ or GENI?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
8% net margin versus -25. 6% for Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited — meaning it keeps 43. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSGE leads at 13. 0% versus -22. 3% for MMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKLZ leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MMA or FWONK or MSGE or SKLZ or GENI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) trades at 52.
4x forward P/E versus 57. 5x for Formula One Group — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKLZ: 931. 5% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MMA or FWONK or MSGE or SKLZ or GENI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MMA or FWONK or MSGE or SKLZ or GENI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Formula One Group (FWONK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), +418. 1% 10Y return). Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FWONK: +418. 1%, SKLZ: -96. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MMA and FWONK and MSGE and SKLZ and GENI?
These companies operate in different sectors (MMA (Consumer Cyclical) and FWONK (Communication Services) and MSGE (Communication Services) and SKLZ (Technology) and GENI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MMA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWONK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKLZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 29%
- Gross Margin > 18%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 18%
- Gross Margin > 13%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.