Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Apparel - Retail
MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $4.40B | $388M | $22.60B | $171.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.63B | $1.06B | $7.81B | $60.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.35B | $-61M | $1.09B | $5.49B |
| Gross Margin | 45.1% | 24.8% | 46.2% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | -5.3% | 18.1% | 12.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1.6x | — | 21.1x | 33.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.11B | $22M | $1.46B | $22.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.33B | $175M | $1.02B | $6.23B |
MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MINISO Group Holdin… (MNSO) | 100 | 76.0 | -24.0% |
| Bed Bath & Beyond I… (BBBY) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
| Williams-Sonoma, In… (WSM) | 100 | 402.4 | +302.4% |
| The TJX Companies, … (TJX) | 100 | 304.1 | +204.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNSO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 121.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 1.24, yield 4.0%, current ratio 2.04x
BBBY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +40.3% vs MNSO's -14.1%
WSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs TJX's 322.5%
- 13.9% margin vs BBBY's -5.8%
- 20.6% ROA vs BBBY's -15.3%, ROIC 44.3% vs -91.0%
TJX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.25 vs WSM's 1.36
- Beta 0.39 vs BBBY's 3.12
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs BBBY's -25.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.6x vs 21.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs BBBY's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs BBBY's 3.12 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, vs WSM's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.3% vs MNSO's -14.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.6% ROA vs BBBY's -15.3%, ROIC 44.3% vs -91.0% |
MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSM leads in 2 of 6 categories
TJX leads 2 • MNSO leads 0 • BBBY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TJX is the larger business by revenue, generating $60.4B annually — 56.9x BBBY's $1.1B. WSM is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBBY's -5.8%. On growth, MNSO holds the edge at +23.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.6B | $1.1B | $7.8B | $60.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.3B | -$36M | $1.5B | $8.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.4B | -$61M | $1.1B | $5.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$76M | $1.1B | $4.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.1% | +24.8% | +46.2% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | -5.3% | +18.1% | +12.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | -5.8% | +13.9% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | -7.2% | +13.6% | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | +6.9% | -4.3% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.9% | +67.7% | -1.1% | +28.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNSO and BBBY each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.8x trailing earnings, MNSO trades at a 63% valuation discount to TJX's 31.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TJX offers better value at 0.24x vs WSM's 1.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $388M | $22.6B | $171.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $235M | $23.0B | $187.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.76x | -3.80x | 20.76x | 31.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.55x | — | 21.08x | 32.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.34x | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.88x | — | 13.98x | 22.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.76x | 0.37x | 2.89x | 2.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.97x | 1.48x | 10.85x | 17.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.29x | — | 21.41x | 35.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TJX leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TJX delivers a 53.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $54 in annual profit, vs $-32 for BBBY. BBBY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TJX's 2.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TJX scores 6/9 vs WSM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.7% | -32.4% | +51.5% | +53.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | -15.3% | +20.6% | +15.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +44.5% | -91.0% | +44.3% | +25.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +29.5% | -29.8% | +41.4% | +33.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.10x | 0.70x | 2.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.2B | -$153M | $437M | $16.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.3B | $175M | $1.0B | $6.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $22M | $1.5B | $22.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.65x | — | — | 133.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TJX five years ago would be worth $21,851 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $666 for BBBY. Over the past 12 months, BBBY leads with a +40.3% total return vs MNSO's -14.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSM at 48.4% vs BBBY's -35.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.6% | -9.3% | -1.5% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.1% | +40.3% | +18.2% | +21.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.3% | -73.0% | +227.0% | +102.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.9% | -93.3% | +107.3% | +118.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.5% | -48.2% | +587.8% | +322.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | -35.4% | +48.4% | +26.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TJX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TJX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBBY's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TJX currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs BBBY's 42.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 3.12x | 1.49x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.74 | $12.65 | $221.81 | $165.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.48 | $3.74 | $147.39 | $119.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.3% | +42.4% | +82.7% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 52.1 | 48.9 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 443K | 2.7M | 1.2M | 4.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MNSO and WSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNSO as "Buy", BBBY as "Hold", WSM as "Hold", TJX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.0% upside for MNSO (target: $22) vs 9.1% for WSM (target: $200). For income investors, MNSO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.04% vs TJX's 1.06%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.35 | $7.75 | $200.25 | $172.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 41 | 56 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | — | +1.4% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 20 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.99 | — | $2.57 | $1.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +1.6% | +3.8% | +1.5% |
WSM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TJX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the stronger pick with 688.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (1. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?
On trailing P/E, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the cheapest at 11.
8x versus The TJX Companies, Inc. at 31. 7x. On forward P/E, MINISO Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The TJX Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus Williams-Sonoma, Inc. 's 1. 36x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?
Over the past 5 years, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) delivered a total return of +118. 5%, compared to -93. 3% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSM returned +587. 8% versus BBBY's -48. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. 's 3. 12β — meaning BBBY is approximately 693% more volatile than TJX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 2% for The TJX Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is pulling ahead at 688.
8% versus -25. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MINISO Group Holding Limited grew EPS 650. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 6% for Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNSO leads at 121. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?
MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
4% net margin versus -8. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNSO leads at 19. 5% versus -5. 9% for BBBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSM leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Williams-Sonoma, Inc. 's 1. 36x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) trades at 1. 6x forward P/E versus 33. 0x for The TJX Companies, Inc. — 31. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNSO: 54. 0% to $22. 35.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?
In this comparison, MNSO (4.
0% yield), WSM (1. 4% yield), TJX (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BBBY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 1% yield, +322. 5% 10Y return). Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TJX: +322. 5%, BBBY: -48. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNSO and BBBY and WSM and TJX?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNSO is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WSM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TJX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MNSO, WSM, TJX pay a dividend while BBBY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.