Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$4.40B
5Y Perf.-24.0%
BBBY
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$388M
5Y Perf.-90.4%
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$22.60B
5Y Perf.+302.4%
TJX
The TJX Companies, Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$171.46B
5Y Perf.+204.1%

MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MNSO logoMNSO
BBBY logoBBBY
WSM logoWSM
TJX logoTJX
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailApparel - Retail
Market Cap$4.40B$388M$22.60B$171.46B
Revenue (TTM)$18.63B$1.06B$7.81B$60.37B
Net Income (TTM)$2.35B$-61M$1.09B$5.49B
Gross Margin45.1%24.8%46.2%31.1%
Operating Margin18.1%-5.3%18.1%12.0%
Forward P/E1.6x21.1x33.0x
Total Debt$3.11B$22M$1.46B$22.38B
Cash & Equiv.$6.33B$175M$1.02B$6.23B

MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MNSO
BBBY
WSM
TJX
StockOct 20May 26Return
MINISO Group Holdin… (MNSO)10076.0-24.0%
Bed Bath & Beyond I… (BBBY)1009.6-90.4%
Williams-Sonoma, In… (WSM)100402.4+302.4%
The TJX Companies, … (TJX)100304.1+204.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MNSO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. BBBY and TJX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
The Income Pick

MNSO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 4.0%
  • Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 121.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 2.04x
  • Beta 1.24, yield 4.0%, current ratio 2.04x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BBBY
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
The Momentum Pick

BBBY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +40.3% vs MNSO's -14.1%
Best for: momentum
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

WSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 5.9% 10Y total return vs TJX's 322.5%
  • 13.9% margin vs BBBY's -5.8%
  • 20.6% ROA vs BBBY's -15.3%, ROIC 44.3% vs -91.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
TJX
The TJX Companies, Inc.
The Value Pick

TJX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.25 vs WSM's 1.36
  • Beta 0.39 vs BBBY's 3.12
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMNSO logoMNSO6.9% revenue growth vs BBBY's -25.1%
ValueMNSO logoMNSOLower P/E (1.6x vs 21.1x)
Quality / MarginsWSM logoWSM13.9% margin vs BBBY's -5.8%
Stability / SafetyTJX logoTJXBeta 0.39 vs BBBY's 3.12
DividendsMNSO logoMNSO4.0% yield, vs WSM's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BBBY logoBBBY+40.3% vs MNSO's -14.1%
Efficiency (ROA)WSM logoWSM20.6% ROA vs BBBY's -15.3%, ROIC 44.3% vs -91.0%

MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MNSOMINISO Group Holding Limited
FY 2024
- Product sales to franchisees
46.6%$7.9B
- Sales to offline distributors
19.8%$3.4B
- Retail sales in self-operated stores
18.6%$3.2B
- Online sales
5.5%$941M
-Others
4.0%$684M
- Sales-based management and consultation service fees
3.8%$641M
- Sales-based royalties
0.8%$131M
Other (2)
0.9%$145M
BBBYBed Bath & Beyond Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.0B
WSMWilliams-Sonoma, Inc.
FY 2024
Pottery Barn Segment
39.4%$3.0B
West Elm Segment
23.9%$1.8B
Williams Sonoma Segment
16.9%$1.3B
Pottery Barn Kids And Teen Segment
14.4%$1.1B
Other Segments
5.5%$421M
TJXThe TJX Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Marmaxx
61.4%$34.6B
HomeGoods
16.7%$9.4B
TJX International
12.7%$7.2B
TJX Canada
9.2%$5.2B

MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWSMLAGGINGBBBY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TJX is the larger business by revenue, generating $60.4B annually — 56.9x BBBY's $1.1B. WSM is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBBY's -5.8%. On growth, MNSO holds the edge at +23.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…BBBY logoBBBYBed Bath & Beyond…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …TJX logoTJXThe TJX Companies…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$18.6B$1.1B$7.8B$60.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$3.3B-$36M$1.5B$8.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.4B-$61M$1.1B$5.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$76M$1.1B$4.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.1%+24.8%+46.2%+31.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.1%-5.3%+18.1%+12.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.6%-5.8%+13.9%+9.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.3%-7.2%+13.6%+8.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.1%+6.9%-4.3%+8.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-14.9%+67.7%-1.1%+28.5%
WSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MNSO and BBBY each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.8x trailing earnings, MNSO trades at a 63% valuation discount to TJX's 31.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TJX offers better value at 0.24x vs WSM's 1.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…BBBY logoBBBYBed Bath & Beyond…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …TJX logoTJXThe TJX Companies…
Market CapShares × price$4.4B$388M$22.6B$171.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.9B$235M$23.0B$187.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.76x-3.80x20.76x31.65x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.55x21.08x32.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.34x0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.88x13.98x22.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.76x0.37x2.89x2.84x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.97x1.48x10.85x17.05x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.29x21.41x35.31x
Evenly matched — MNSO and BBBY each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TJX leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

TJX delivers a 53.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $54 in annual profit, vs $-32 for BBBY. BBBY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TJX's 2.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TJX scores 6/9 vs WSM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…BBBY logoBBBYBed Bath & Beyond…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …TJX logoTJXThe TJX Companies…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+22.7%-32.4%+51.5%+53.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+10.8%-15.3%+20.6%+15.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+44.5%-91.0%+44.3%+25.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+29.5%-29.8%+41.4%+33.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.30x0.10x0.70x2.20x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3.2B-$153M$437M$16.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6.3B$175M$1.0B$6.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.1B$22M$1.5B$22.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense11.65x133.22x
TJX leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TJX five years ago would be worth $21,851 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $666 for BBBY. Over the past 12 months, BBBY leads with a +40.3% total return vs MNSO's -14.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSM at 48.4% vs BBBY's -35.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…BBBY logoBBBYBed Bath & Beyond…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …TJX logoTJXThe TJX Companies…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-23.6%-9.3%-1.5%+0.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-14.1%+40.3%+18.2%+21.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.3%-73.0%+227.0%+102.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-31.9%-93.3%+107.3%+118.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.5%-48.2%+587.8%+322.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.4%-35.4%+48.4%+26.6%
WSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TJX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TJX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBBY's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TJX currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs BBBY's 42.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…BBBY logoBBBYBed Bath & Beyond…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …TJX logoTJXThe TJX Companies…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x3.12x1.49x0.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$26.74$12.65$221.81$165.82
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.48$3.74$147.39$119.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.3%+42.4%+82.7%+93.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.952.148.943.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded443K2.7M1.2M4.0M
TJX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MNSO and WSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MNSO as "Buy", BBBY as "Hold", WSM as "Hold", TJX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.0% upside for MNSO (target: $22) vs 9.1% for WSM (target: $200). For income investors, MNSO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.04% vs TJX's 1.06%.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…BBBY logoBBBYBed Bath & Beyond…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …TJX logoTJXThe TJX Companies…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$22.35$7.75$200.25$172.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts4415653
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.0%+1.4%+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00205
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.99$2.57$1.64
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.0%+1.6%+3.8%+1.5%
Evenly matched — MNSO and WSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WSM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TJX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallWilliams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MNSO vs BBBY vs WSM vs TJX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the stronger pick with 688.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (1. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?

On trailing P/E, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the cheapest at 11.

8x versus The TJX Companies, Inc. at 31. 7x. On forward P/E, MINISO Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The TJX Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus Williams-Sonoma, Inc. 's 1. 36x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?

Over the past 5 years, The TJX Companies, Inc.

(TJX) delivered a total return of +118. 5%, compared to -93. 3% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSM returned +587. 8% versus BBBY's -48. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The TJX Companies, Inc.

(TJX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. 's 3. 12β — meaning BBBY is approximately 693% more volatile than TJX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 2% for The TJX Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is pulling ahead at 688.

8% versus -25. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MINISO Group Holding Limited grew EPS 650. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 6% for Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNSO leads at 121. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?

MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

4% net margin versus -8. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNSO leads at 19. 5% versus -5. 9% for BBBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSM leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Williams-Sonoma, Inc. 's 1. 36x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) trades at 1. 6x forward P/E versus 33. 0x for The TJX Companies, Inc. — 31. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNSO: 54. 0% to $22. 35.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX?

In this comparison, MNSO (4.

0% yield), WSM (1. 4% yield), TJX (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BBBY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MNSO or BBBY or WSM or TJX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The TJX Companies, Inc.

(TJX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 1% yield, +322. 5% 10Y return). Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TJX: +322. 5%, BBBY: -48. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MNSO and BBBY and WSM and TJX?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MNSO is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WSM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TJX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MNSO, WSM, TJX pay a dividend while BBBY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MNSO

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BBBY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WSM

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TJX

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MNSO and BBBY and WSM and TJX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MNSO: 23.1% · BBBY: 6.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.