Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MOFG vs CZWI vs FBIZ vs LKFN vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MOFG vs CZWI vs FBIZ vs LKFN vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $203M | $473M | $1.63B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $90M | $279M | $422M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $14M | $51M | $103M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 54.7% | 57.3% | 61.0% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | -40.8% | 7.0% | 21.6% | 29.8% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 11.8x | 9.1x | 14.4x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $117M | $52M | $259M | $184M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $119M | $31M | $57M | $185M |
MOFG vs CZWI vs FBIZ vs LKFN vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 257.0 | +157.0% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 246.8 | +146.8% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 346.3 | +246.3% |
| Lakeland Financial … (LKFN) | 100 | 139.6 | +39.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 141.9 | +41.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOFG vs CZWI vs FBIZ vs LKFN vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +77.6% vs LKFN's +9.0%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs MOFG's 1.29
FBIZ has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 161.7% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- PEG 0.36 vs LKFN's 3.63
- NIM 3.3% vs MOFG's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.36 vs 1.53
LKFN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.36 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs MOFG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs LKFN's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.6% vs LKFN's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
MOFG vs CZWI vs FBIZ vs LKFN vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MOFG vs CZWI vs FBIZ vs LKFN vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FBIZ leads in 1 of 6 categories
LKFN leads 1 • MOFG leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MOFG and LKFN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.6x CZWI's $90M. LKFN is the more profitable business, keeping 24.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $90M | $279M | $422M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $9M | $49M | $130M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $14M | $51M | $103M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $11M | $53M | $104M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +54.7% | +57.3% | +61.0% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -40.8% | +7.0% | +21.6% | +29.8% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | +16.0% | +18.0% | +24.5% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +11.5% | +21.9% | +24.6% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.6% | +63.0% | +12.9% | +23.4% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIZ leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FBIZ trades at a 40% valuation discount to LKFN's 15.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIZ offers better value at 0.37x vs LKFN's 3.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $203M | $473M | $1.6B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $136M | $702M | $1.8B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.93x | 14.44x | 9.36x | 15.61x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.77x | 11.78x | 9.15x | 14.42x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.85x | 0.37x | 3.93x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.28x | 11.61x | 13.49x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.94x | 2.25x | 1.69x | 3.87x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 1.09x | 1.25x | 2.12x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.74x | 19.55x | 7.74x | 15.72x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FBIZ's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIZ scores 8/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +7.8% | +14.1% | +14.2% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +1.5% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.4% | +2.0% | +7.0% | +11.6% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | +0.6% | +2.6% | +15.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.28x | 0.70x | 0.24x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | -$67M | $229M | $127M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $119M | $31M | $57M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $117M | $52M | $259M | $184M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.16x | 0.42x | 0.82x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $23,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,052 for LKFN. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +77.6% total return vs LKFN's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs LKFN's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.2% | +21.5% | +7.1% | +12.7% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.6% | +45.6% | +21.0% | +9.0% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.6% | +160.0% | +136.5% | +48.1% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.2% | +71.2% | +130.9% | +10.5% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | +157.0% | +161.7% | +142.7% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.0% | +37.5% | +33.2% | +14.0% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOFG and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs LKFN's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.46x | 0.81x | 0.79x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.69 | $22.62 | $60.54 | $69.40 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.52 | $12.83 | $45.90 | $54.36 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +93.2% | +93.7% | +90.2% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.9 | 63.7 | 49.1 | 60.9 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 40K | 39K | 153K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIZ and LKFN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOFG as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", FBIZ as "Buy", LKFN as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.1% upside for FBIZ (target: $67) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, LKFN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | — | $67.00 | $66.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.8% | +2.1% | +3.2% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 7 | 13 | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $0.37 | $1.19 | $2.00 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +3.1% | +0.3% | +1.2% | +0.4% |
FBIZ leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). LKFN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
MOFG vs CZWI vs FBIZ vs LKFN vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOFG or CZWI or FBIZ or LKFN or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOFG or CZWI or FBIZ or LKFN or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation at 15. 6x. On forward P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Business Financial Services, Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOFG or CZWI or FBIZ or LKFN or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to +10. 5% for Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBIZ returned +161. 7% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOFG or CZWI or FBIZ or LKFN or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning MOFG is approximately 182% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 70% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOFG or CZWI or FBIZ or LKFN or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Business Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 16. 5% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOFG or CZWI or FBIZ or LKFN or NBTB?
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
5% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKFN leads at 29. 8% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOFG or CZWI or FBIZ or LKFN or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for Lakeland Financial Corporation — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIZ: 18. 1% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOFG or CZWI or FBIZ or LKFN or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is MOFG or CZWI or FBIZ or LKFN or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, MOFG: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOFG and CZWI and FBIZ and LKFN and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; LKFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.