Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MOFG vs MVBF vs FFIN vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MOFG vs MVBF vs FFIN vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $339M | $4.61B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $270M | $739M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $27M | $243M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 71.7% | 70.8% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | -40.8% | 13.6% | 36.8% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 15.2x | 15.9x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $117M | $77M | $197M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $244M | $763M | $185M |
MOFG vs MVBF vs FFIN vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 257.0 | +157.0% |
| MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) | 100 | 198.9 | +98.9% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 103.9 | +3.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 141.9 | +41.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOFG vs MVBF vs FFIN vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 109.8% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- +77.6% vs FFIN's -3.2%
MVBF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 34.6%
- NIM 3.2% vs MOFG's 2.5%
- 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
- Beta 0.84 vs MOFG's 1.29
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- PEG 1.53 vs FFIN's 3.05
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.53 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs MOFG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MVBF's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.6% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
MOFG vs MVBF vs FFIN vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MOFG vs MVBF vs FFIN vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
MOFG leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • MVBF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 4.2x MOFG's $206M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $270M | $739M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $39M | $310M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $27M | $243M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $2M | $290M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +71.7% | +70.8% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -40.8% | +13.6% | +36.8% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | +10.0% | +30.2% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +0.8% | +39.6% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.6% | -55.6% | -7.7% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MVBF and NBTB each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, MVBF trades at a 38% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $339M | $4.6B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $172M | $4.0B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.93x | 12.81x | 20.76x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.77x | 15.23x | 15.92x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.98x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.67x | 14.17x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.94x | 1.25x | 6.23x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 1.04x | 2.89x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.74x | 160.42x | 15.73x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for MVBF. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVBF's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MVBF scores 7/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +8.5% | +13.3% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.4% | +7.0% | +11.0% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | +8.2% | +16.0% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.23x | 0.12x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | -$167M | -$566M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $244M | $763M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $117M | $77M | $197M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.54x | 1.48x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOFG five years ago would be worth $17,220 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +77.6% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.2% | +4.3% | +8.5% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.6% | +53.4% | -3.2% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.6% | +65.3% | +29.1% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.2% | -27.7% | -28.2% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | +135.5% | +145.4% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.0% | +18.2% | +8.9% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOFG and MVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MVBF is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.84x | 0.95x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.69 | $29.59 | $38.74 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.52 | $17.13 | $28.11 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +89.2% | +83.6% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.9 | 50.8 | 58.2 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 34K | 740K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOFG as "Buy", MVBF as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs MOFG's 1.97%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | $30.00 | $39.25 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 7 | 15 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.5% | +2.2% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $0.66 | $0.72 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +3.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MOFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MOFG vs MVBF vs FFIN vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOFG or MVBF or FFIN or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOFG or MVBF or FFIN or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOFG or MVBF or FFIN or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
(MOFG) delivered a total return of +72. 2%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOFG or MVBF or FFIN or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning MOFG is approximately 54% more volatile than MVBF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 23% for MVB Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOFG or MVBF or FFIN or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MVB Financial Corp. grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOFG or MVBF or FFIN or NBTB?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOFG or MVBF or FFIN or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOFG or MVBF or FFIN or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 0% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG).
09Is MOFG or MVBF or FFIN or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 2. 5% yield, +135. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MVBF: +135. 5%, MOFG: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOFG and MVBF and FFIN and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.