Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MOMO vs LOGI vs MTCH vs BMBL vs LIVE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
Home Improvement
MOMO vs LOGI vs MTCH vs BMBL vs LIVE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Computer Hardware | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Home Improvement |
| Market Cap | $2.16B | $14.81B | $8.34B | $403M | $40M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.29B | $4.84B | $3.52B | $931M | $442M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $800M | $711M | $663M | $-661M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 43.2% | 73.8% | 71.8% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 16.0% | 26.6% | -15.6% | 3.9% |
| Forward P/E | 1.1x | 18.6x | 13.5x | 3.5x | 2.7x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $0.00 | $3.97B | $588M | $216M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.44B | $1.75B | $1.03B | $176M | $9M |
MOMO vs LOGI vs MTCH vs BMBL vs LIVE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 40.0 | -60.0% |
| Logitech Internatio… (LOGI) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
| Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) | 100 | 23.4 | -76.6% |
| Bumble Inc. (BMBL) | 100 | 5.1 | -94.9% |
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 100 | 56.3 | -43.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOMO vs LOGI vs MTCH vs BMBL vs LIVE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 4.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 4.68x
- Beta 0.78, yield 4.6%, current ratio 4.68x
- Lower P/E (1.1x vs 13.5x)
LOGI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs MTCH's 195.5%
- 6.3% revenue growth vs BMBL's -9.9%
- +35.0% vs BMBL's -21.2%
- 18.5% ROA vs BMBL's -36.5%, ROIC 97.8% vs 13.4%
MTCH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.2%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
- 18.8% margin vs BMBL's -71.0%
BMBL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LIVE is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.27 vs MTCH's 0.46
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.3% revenue growth vs BMBL's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 13.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs BMBL's -71.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs BMBL's 1.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, vs LOGI's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.0% vs BMBL's -21.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs BMBL's -36.5%, ROIC 97.8% vs 13.4% |
MOMO vs LOGI vs MTCH vs BMBL vs LIVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MOMO vs LOGI vs MTCH vs BMBL vs LIVE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LOGI leads in 2 of 6 categories
MTCH leads 1 • BMBL leads 1 • MOMO leads 0 • LIVE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTCH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.3B annually — 23.3x LIVE's $442M. MTCH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BMBL's -71.0%. On growth, LOGI holds the edge at +7.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.3B | $4.8B | $3.5B | $931M | $442M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $855M | $1.0B | -$125M | $29M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $800M | $711M | $663M | -$661M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $685M | $976M | $1.0B | $272M | $22M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +43.2% | +73.8% | +71.8% | +33.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +16.0% | +26.6% | -15.6% | +3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +14.7% | +18.8% | -71.0% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +20.2% | +29.0% | +29.2% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.1% | +7.4% | +3.9% | -14.1% | -2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.1% | +2.1% | +45.5% | +2.3% | -112.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BMBL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.7x trailing earnings, LIVE trades at a 88% valuation discount to LOGI's 21.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIVE offers better value at 0.27x vs MTCH's 0.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $14.8B | $8.3B | $403M | $40M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $13.1B | $11.3B | $816M | $248M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.34x | 21.50x | 15.05x | -0.52x | 2.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.08x | 18.60x | 13.49x | 3.55x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.51x | — | 0.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.91x | 16.85x | 11.53x | 2.91x | 7.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.46x | 3.06x | 2.39x | 0.42x | 0.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 6.88x | — | 0.54x | 0.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.90x | 15.18x | 8.14x | 1.69x | 1.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOGI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOGI delivers a 32.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-77 for BMBL. MOMO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIVE's 2.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOMO scores 7/9 vs BMBL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.2% | +32.2% | — | -76.8% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +18.5% | +15.3% | -36.5% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +97.8% | +23.7% | +13.4% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | +31.1% | +23.7% | +13.9% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — | — | 0.88x | 2.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5.3B | -$1.8B | $2.9B | $413M | $208M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.4B | $1.8B | $1.0B | $176M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $0 | $4.0B | $588M | $216M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.04x | — | 6.17x | -35.17x | 5.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LOGI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LOGI five years ago would be worth $9,536 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $597 for BMBL. Over the past 12 months, LOGI leads with a +35.0% total return vs BMBL's -21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOGI at 18.5% vs BMBL's -41.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.6% | +2.9% | +14.1% | -4.4% | -16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.2% | +35.0% | +20.5% | -21.2% | -9.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.7% | +66.3% | +13.9% | -80.0% | -56.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.7% | -4.6% | -74.7% | -94.0% | -64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | +640.3% | +195.5% | -95.1% | +33.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.9% | +18.5% | +4.4% | -41.6% | -24.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOMO and MTCH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BMBL's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTCH currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs BMBL's 40.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 1.36x | 1.04x | 1.43x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.22 | $123.01 | $39.20 | $8.64 | $25.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.68 | $76.81 | $26.80 | $2.61 | $7.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.8% | +83.9% | +91.4% | +40.0% | +50.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.2 | 65.0 | 68.8 | 35.9 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 648K | 1.0M | 4.4M | 4.2M | 5K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MOMO and LOGI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOMO as "Buy", LOGI as "Hold", MTCH as "Buy", BMBL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.8% upside for MOMO (target: $8) vs 0.5% for MTCH (target: $36). For income investors, MOMO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.61% vs LOGI's 1.52%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.10 | $109.00 | $36.00 | $4.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 19 | 32 | 23 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | +1.5% | +2.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.99 | $1.57 | $0.71 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.1% | 0.0% | +9.5% | +7.1% | +1.3% |
LOGI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MTCH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
MOMO vs LOGI vs MTCH vs BMBL vs LIVE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOMO or LOGI or MTCH or BMBL or LIVE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Logitech International S.
A. (LOGI) is the stronger pick with 6. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Bumble Inc. (BMBL). Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOMO or LOGI or MTCH or BMBL or LIVE?
On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.
7x versus Logitech International S. A. at 21. 5x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOMO or LOGI or MTCH or BMBL or LIVE?
Over the past 5 years, Logitech International S.
A. (LOGI) delivered a total return of -4. 6%, compared to -94. 0% for Bumble Inc. (BMBL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOGI returned +640. 3% versus BMBL's -95. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOMO or LOGI or MTCH or BMBL or LIVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Bumble Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning BMBL is approximately 82% more volatile than MOMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOMO or LOGI or MTCH or BMBL or LIVE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Logitech International S.
A. (LOGI) is pulling ahead at 6. 3% versus -9. 9% for Bumble Inc. (BMBL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Ventures Incorporated grew EPS 158. 1% year-over-year, compared to -44. 9% for Bumble Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOMO or LOGI or MTCH or BMBL or LIVE?
Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -72. 7% for Bumble Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMBL leads at 26. 3% versus 3. 3% for LIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTCH leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOMO or LOGI or MTCH or BMBL or LIVE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) trades at 1. 1x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Logitech International S. A. — 17. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MOMO: 27. 8% to $8. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOMO or LOGI or MTCH or BMBL or LIVE?
In this comparison, MOMO (4.
6% yield), MTCH (2. 0% yield), LOGI (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. BMBL, LIVE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MOMO or LOGI or MTCH or BMBL or LIVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 4. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9. 4%, BMBL: -95. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOMO and LOGI and MTCH and BMBL and LIVE?
These companies operate in different sectors (MOMO (Communication Services) and LOGI (Technology) and MTCH (Communication Services) and BMBL (Technology) and LIVE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; LOGI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MTCH is a small-cap deep-value stock; BMBL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIVE is a small-cap deep-value stock. MOMO, LOGI, MTCH pay a dividend while BMBL, LIVE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 11%
- Dividend Yield > 0.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.