Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MQ vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MQ
Marqeta, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.78B
5Y Perf.-85.1%
RPAY
Repay Holdings Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$307M
5Y Perf.-85.5%
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$451M
5Y Perf.-27.9%
FLYW
Flywire Corporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.12B
5Y Perf.-51.7%

MQ vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MQ logoMQ
RPAY logoRPAY
PRTH logoPRTH
FLYW logoFLYW
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$1.78B$307M$451M$2.12B
Revenue (TTM)$652M$313M$953M$188.60B
Net Income (TTM)$2M$-259M$56M$12.54B
Gross Margin70.0%55.4%21.4%0.2%
Operating Margin-4.0%-35.9%14.8%5.7%
Forward P/E250.9x3.9x5.8x49.5x
Total Debt$22M$437M$1.05B$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$982M$116M$77M$330M

MQ vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYWLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MQ
RPAY
PRTH
FLYW
StockJun 21May 26Return
Marqeta, Inc. (MQ)10014.9-85.1%
Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY)10014.5-85.5%
Priority Technology… (PRTH)10072.1-27.9%
Flywire Corporation (FLYW)10048.3-51.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MQ vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FLYW leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Marqeta, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. RPAY also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MQ
Marqeta, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 1.65x
  • Beta 0.87, current ratio 1.65x
  • Beta 0.87 vs PRTH's 2.12
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
RPAY
Repay Holdings Corporation
The Value Play

RPAY is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (3.9x vs 49.5x)
Best for: value
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

PRTH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.12
  • -43.8% 10Y total return vs FLYW's -49.5%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
FLYW
Flywire Corporation
The Growth Play

FLYW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
  • 26.6% revenue growth vs RPAY's -1.2%
  • 6.6% margin vs RPAY's -82.7%
  • +62.7% vs PRTH's -10.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFLYW logoFLYW26.6% revenue growth vs RPAY's -1.2%
ValueRPAY logoRPAYLower P/E (3.9x vs 49.5x)
Quality / MarginsFLYW logoFLYW6.6% margin vs RPAY's -82.7%
Stability / SafetyMQ logoMQBeta 0.87 vs PRTH's 2.12
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FLYW logoFLYW+62.7% vs PRTH's -10.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FLYW logoFLYW4.3% ROA vs RPAY's -20.3%, ROIC 2.1% vs -1.0%

MQ vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MQMarqeta, Inc.
FY 2025
Platform Service Revenue, Net
95.1%$594M
Other Services Revenue
4.9%$31M
RPAYRepay Holdings Corporation
FY 2025
Consumer Payments
100.0%$286M
PRTHPriority Technology Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Credit Card, Merchant Discount
74.6%$711M
Money Transmissions Services
16.7%$159M
Outsourced Services And Other Services
7.4%$71M
Product
1.3%$12M
FLYWFlywire Corporation
FY 2025
Transactions
100.0%$503M

MQ vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPRTHLAGGINGMQ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FLYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 603.1x RPAY's $313M. FLYW is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPAY's -82.7%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$652M$313M$953M$188.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5M-$10M$204M$10.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M-$259M$56M$12.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$112M$61M$75M-$15.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.0%+55.4%+21.4%+0.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.0%-35.9%+14.8%+5.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.3%-82.7%+5.8%+6.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+17.2%+19.4%+7.9%-8.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+19.2%+4.5%+8.8%+1408.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.2%-34.4%+3.1%+4.0%
FLYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RPAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.1x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 95% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.

MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$1.8B$307M$451M$2.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$817M$629M$1.4B$1.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-139.67x-1.16x8.10x161.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.250.90x3.86x5.78x49.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.98x6.95x47.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.84x0.99x0.47x3.40x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.54x0.62x2.71x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.05x3.37x6.01x21.41x
RPAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FLYW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FLYW delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-47 for RPAY. MQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RPAY's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRTH scores 6/9 vs RPAY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.3%-46.6%+5.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.2%-20.3%+2.6%+4.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.0%+13.4%+2.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.1%-1.0%+16.0%+1.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94466
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.91x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$960M$321M$969M-$330M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$982M$116M$77M$330M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$22M$437M$1.0B$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-36.81x1.51x1.84x
FLYW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PRTH five years ago would be worth $8,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,373 for MQ. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs PRTH's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 14.6% vs RPAY's -17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.7%-3.6%+3.6%+27.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+2.4%-7.9%-10.4%+62.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-6.1%-44.3%+50.5%-40.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.3%-83.8%-15.9%-49.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.3%-63.8%-43.8%-49.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-2.1%-17.7%+14.6%-15.7%
PRTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MQ and FLYW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs RPAY's 57.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x1.57x2.12x1.32x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.04$6.06$8.89$18.05
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.70$2.30$4.44$9.79
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+59.5%+57.6%+62.0%+98.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.048.953.483.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.3M2.0M252K1.9M
Evenly matched — MQ and FLYW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PRTH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: MQ as "Hold", RPAY as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.6% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18).

MetricMQ logoMQMarqeta, Inc.RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.75$6.83$11.00$17.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts2217519
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+22.0%+12.5%+2.3%+3.7%
PRTH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FLYW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRTH leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallPriority Technology Holding… (PRTH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MQ vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MQ or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger pick with 26.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MQ or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW?

On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Repay Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MQ or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW?

Over the past 5 years, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) delivered a total return of -15. 9%, compared to -86. 3% for Marqeta, Inc. (MQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRTH returned -43. 8% versus MQ's -86. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MQ or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marqeta, Inc.

(MQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning PRTH is approximately 144% more volatile than MQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 91% for Repay Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MQ or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is pulling ahead at 26.

6% versus -1. 2% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -26. 3% for Repay Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MQ or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW?

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -83. 0% for Repay Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTH leads at 14. 8% versus -4. 7% for MQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RPAY leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MQ or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) trades at 3.

9x forward P/E versus 250. 9x for Marqeta, Inc. — 247. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 99. 6% to $11. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MQ or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is MQ or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Marqeta, Inc.

(MQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MQ: -86. 3%, PRTH: -43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MQ and RPAY and PRTH and FLYW?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MQ is a small-cap high-growth stock; RPAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MQ

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 42%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RPAY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRTH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLYW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 70429%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MQ and RPAY and PRTH and FLYW on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MQ: 19.2% · RPAY: 4.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.