Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MUSA vs CASY vs ARKO vs SUN vs DINO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
MUSA vs CASY vs ARKO vs SUN vs DINO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Cap | $10.75B | $31.59B | $753M | $9.26B | $12.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19.68B | $16.98B | $7.59B | $30.71B | $27.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $554M | $650M | $27M | $835M | $1.23B |
| Gross Margin | 5.5% | 23.9% | 11.1% | 10.3% | 7.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 6.3% | 1.7% | 4.9% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 19.8x | 47.1x | 25.8x | 9.4x | 12.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.25B | $2.96B | $3.95B | $16.11B | $3.23B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $327M | $305M | $891M | $978M |
MUSA vs CASY vs ARKO vs SUN vs DINO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) | 100 | 500.6 | +400.6% |
| Casey's General Sto… (CASY) | 100 | 532.7 | +432.7% |
| Arko Corp. (ARKO) | 100 | 67.4 | -32.6% |
| Sunoco LP (SUN) | 100 | 262.8 | +162.8% |
| HF Sinclair Corpora… (DINO) | 100 | 224.2 | +124.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MUSA vs CASY vs ARKO vs SUN vs DINO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MUSA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 8.0% 10Y total return vs CASY's 6.4%
- 11.7% ROA vs ARKO's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.3%
CASY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
Among these 5 stocks, ARKO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 7.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, current ratio 1.38x
- PEG 0.53 vs CASY's 3.02
- Beta 0.13, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.38x
DINO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 4.5% margin vs ARKO's 0.4%
- +121.7% vs MUSA's +15.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% revenue growth vs ARKO's -12.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 12.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.5% margin vs ARKO's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs ARKO's 1.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CASY's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +121.7% vs MUSA's +15.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs ARKO's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.3% |
MUSA vs CASY vs ARKO vs SUN vs DINO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MUSA vs CASY vs ARKO vs SUN vs DINO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DINO leads in 1 of 6 categories
SUN leads 1 • MUSA leads 1 • CASY leads 1 • ARKO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DINO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.7B annually — 4.0x ARKO's $7.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.5% (DINO) to 0.4% (ARKO). On growth, SUN holds the edge at +106.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.7B | $17.0B | $7.6B | $30.7B | $27.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $1.5B | $264M | $2.3B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $554M | $650M | $27M | $835M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $555M | $667M | $19M | $828M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +23.9% | +11.1% | +10.3% | +7.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +6.3% | +1.7% | +4.9% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +3.8% | +0.4% | +2.7% | +4.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +3.9% | +0.3% | +2.7% | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +0.3% | -3.1% | +106.4% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +176.8% | +49.8% | +41.7% | +179.3% | +135.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SUN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.5x trailing earnings, SUN trades at a 68% valuation discount to CASY's 58.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SUN offers better value at 1.04x vs CASY's 3.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.8B | $31.6B | $753M | $9.3B | $12.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.0B | $34.2B | $4.4B | $24.5B | $15.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.12x | 58.13x | 44.73x | 18.52x | 22.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.84x | 47.05x | 25.81x | 9.39x | 12.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.85x | 3.73x | 2.77x | 1.04x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.71x | 28.51x | 18.58x | 15.14x | 8.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 1.98x | 0.10x | 0.37x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.20x | 9.06x | 2.10x | 1.16x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.73x | 54.03x | 11.54x | 15.06x | 14.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MUSA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MUSA delivers a 89.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $90 in annual profit, vs $7 for ARKO. DINO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARKO's 10.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CASY scores 6/9 vs SUN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +89.5% | +23.7% | +7.0% | +12.9% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.7% | +10.0% | +0.8% | +3.7% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.8% | +11.3% | +2.3% | +4.0% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.0% | +12.5% | +3.3% | +5.0% | +6.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.22x | 0.84x | 10.76x | 2.01x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.2B | $2.6B | $3.6B | $15.2B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $327M | $305M | $891M | $978M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.3B | $3.0B | $4.0B | $16.1B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.47x | 13.45x | 2.56x | 2.69x | 7.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CASY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MUSA five years ago would be worth $41,821 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,933 for ARKO. Over the past 12 months, DINO leads with a +121.7% total return vs MUSA's +15.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CASY at 55.0% vs ARKO's -4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.5% | +53.2% | +50.8% | +30.3% | +51.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.3% | +83.1% | +66.2% | +26.4% | +121.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.0% | +272.4% | -12.5% | +77.6% | +95.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +318.2% | +285.1% | -30.7% | +135.4% | +118.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +803.3% | +638.3% | -27.4% | +209.2% | +202.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.2% | +55.0% | -4.4% | +21.1% | +25.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MUSA and CASY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MUSA is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARKO's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CASY currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs DINO's 94.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.23x | 0.29x | 1.14x | 0.13x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $609.82 | $867.40 | $7.08 | $70.00 | $74.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $345.23 | $430.00 | $3.71 | $47.98 | $32.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +98.1% | +94.8% | +96.9% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.0 | 76.8 | 56.2 | 52.5 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 354K | 545K | 919K | 471K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CASY and SUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MUSA as "Hold", CASY as "Buy", ARKO as "Hold", SUN as "Hold", DINO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.0% upside for ARKO (target: $8) vs -19.1% for CASY (target: $688). For income investors, SUN offers the higher dividend yield at 7.06% vs CASY's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $504.25 | $688.10 | $7.58 | $68.00 | $61.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 25 | 4 | 24 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.2% | +1.8% | +7.1% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.13 | $1.94 | $0.12 | $4.79 | $2.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.0% | +0.0% | +3.7% | 0.0% | +2.8% |
DINO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MUSA vs CASY vs ARKO vs SUN vs DINO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MUSA or CASY or ARKO or SUN or DINO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunoco LP (SUN) is the stronger pick with 11.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 5% for Arko Corp. (ARKO). Sunoco LP (SUN) offers the better valuation at 18. 5x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MUSA or CASY or ARKO or SUN or DINO?
On trailing P/E, Sunoco LP (SUN) is the cheapest at 18.
5x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. at 58. 1x. On forward P/E, Sunoco LP is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sunoco LP wins at 0. 53x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. 's 3. 02x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MUSA or CASY or ARKO or SUN or DINO?
Over the past 5 years, Murphy USA Inc.
(MUSA) delivered a total return of +318. 2%, compared to -30. 7% for Arko Corp. (ARKO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MUSA returned +803. 3% versus ARKO's -27. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MUSA or CASY or ARKO or SUN or DINO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Murphy USA Inc.
(MUSA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 23β versus Arko Corp. 's 1. 14β — meaning ARKO is approximately -590% more volatile than MUSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 11% for Arko Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MUSA or CASY or ARKO or SUN or DINO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunoco LP (SUN) is pulling ahead at 11.
1% versus -12. 5% for Arko Corp. (ARKO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HF Sinclair Corporation grew EPS 241. 8% year-over-year, compared to -39. 0% for Sunoco LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, CASY leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MUSA or CASY or ARKO or SUN or DINO?
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus 0. 3% for Arko Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CASY leads at 5. 0% versus 1. 3% for ARKO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CASY leads at 23. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MUSA or CASY or ARKO or SUN or DINO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sunoco LP (SUN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. 's 3. 02x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sunoco LP (SUN) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 47. 1x for Casey's General Stores, Inc. — 37. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARKO: 13. 0% to $7. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — MUSA or CASY or ARKO or SUN or DINO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sunoco LP (SUN) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 0. 2% for Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY).
09Is MUSA or CASY or ARKO or SUN or DINO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Murphy USA Inc.
(MUSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 23), +803. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MUSA: +803. 3%, ARKO: -27. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MUSA and CASY and ARKO and SUN and DINO?
These companies operate in different sectors (MUSA (Consumer Cyclical) and CASY (Consumer Cyclical) and ARKO (Consumer Cyclical) and SUN (Energy) and DINO (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MUSA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CASY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ARKO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DINO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ARKO, SUN, DINO pay a dividend while MUSA, CASY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.