Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MUSA vs SUN vs CAPL vs DINO vs VLO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
MUSA vs SUN vs CAPL vs DINO vs VLO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Cap | $10.75B | $9.26B | $812M | $12.71B | $70.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19.68B | $30.71B | $4.62B | $27.62B | $126.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $554M | $835M | $60M | $1.23B | $4.21B |
| Gross Margin | 5.5% | 10.3% | 8.5% | 7.3% | 7.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 4.9% | 2.6% | 6.1% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 19.8x | 9.4x | 49.5x | 12.5x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.25B | $16.11B | $908M | $3.23B | $11.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $891M | $3M | $978M | $4.69B |
MUSA vs SUN vs CAPL vs DINO vs VLO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) | 100 | 500.6 | +400.6% |
| Sunoco LP (SUN) | 100 | 262.8 | +162.8% |
| CrossAmerica Partne… (CAPL) | 100 | 141.1 | +41.1% |
| HF Sinclair Corpora… (DINO) | 100 | 224.2 | +124.2% |
| Valero Energy Corpo… (VLO) | 100 | 354.6 | +254.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MUSA vs SUN vs CAPL vs DINO vs VLO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MUSA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.0% 10Y total return vs VLO's 397.5%
- 11.7% ROA vs SUN's 3.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.0%
SUN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth -39.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, current ratio 1.38x
- PEG 0.53 vs MUSA's 1.53
- 11.1% revenue growth vs CAPL's -10.6%
CAPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 9.9%
- Beta 0.06, yield 9.9%, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 0.06 vs DINO's 0.31
- 9.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs VLO's 1.9%
DINO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and momentum.
- 4.5% margin vs CAPL's 1.3%
- +121.7% vs CAPL's +2.7%
Among these 5 stocks, VLO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% revenue growth vs CAPL's -10.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 12.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.5% margin vs CAPL's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs DINO's 0.31 | |
| Dividends | 9.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs VLO's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +121.7% vs CAPL's +2.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs SUN's 3.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.0% |
MUSA vs SUN vs CAPL vs DINO vs VLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MUSA vs SUN vs CAPL vs DINO vs VLO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DINO leads in 1 of 6 categories
SUN leads 1 • CAPL leads 1 • MUSA leads 0 • VLO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DINO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VLO is the larger business by revenue, generating $126.2B annually — 27.3x CAPL's $4.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.5% (DINO) to 1.3% (CAPL). On growth, SUN holds the edge at +106.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.7B | $30.7B | $4.6B | $27.6B | $126.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $2.3B | $200M | $2.6B | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $554M | $835M | $60M | $1.2B | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $555M | $828M | $75M | $1.2B | $5.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +10.3% | +8.5% | +7.3% | +7.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +4.9% | +2.6% | +6.1% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +2.7% | +1.3% | +4.5% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +2.7% | +1.6% | +4.3% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +106.4% | -100.0% | +11.8% | +7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +176.8% | +179.3% | +2.4% | +135.3% | +3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SUN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.5x trailing earnings, SUN trades at a 41% valuation discount to VLO's 31.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SUN offers better value at 1.04x vs MUSA's 1.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.8B | $9.3B | $812M | $12.7B | $70.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.0B | $24.5B | $1.7B | $15.0B | $77.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.12x | 18.52x | 19.54x | 22.67x | 31.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.84x | 9.39x | 49.53x | 12.52x | 10.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.85x | 1.04x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.71x | 15.14x | 5.80x | 8.11x | 10.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 0.37x | 0.22x | 0.47x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.20x | 1.16x | — | 1.42x | 2.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.73x | 15.06x | 14.57x | 14.68x | 14.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAPL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MUSA delivers a 89.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $90 in annual profit, vs $13 for SUN. DINO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MUSA's 5.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DINO scores 6/9 vs CAPL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +89.5% | +12.9% | — | +13.0% | +15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.7% | +3.7% | +6.0% | +7.1% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.8% | +4.0% | +18.1% | +6.1% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.0% | +5.0% | +23.4% | +6.7% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.22x | 2.01x | — | 0.35x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.2B | $15.2B | $905M | $2.3B | $7.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $891M | $3M | $978M | $4.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.3B | $16.1B | $908M | $3.2B | $11.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.47x | 2.69x | 1.86x | 7.13x | 10.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MUSA and DINO and VLO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MUSA five years ago would be worth $41,821 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,614 for CAPL. Over the past 12 months, DINO leads with a +121.7% total return vs CAPL's +2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VLO at 32.4% vs CAPL's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.5% | +30.3% | +8.4% | +51.5% | +43.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.3% | +26.4% | +2.7% | +121.7% | +106.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.0% | +77.6% | +34.7% | +95.6% | +132.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +318.2% | +135.4% | +56.1% | +118.8% | +219.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +803.3% | +209.2% | +87.5% | +202.0% | +397.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.2% | +21.1% | +10.4% | +25.1% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MUSA and SUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MUSA is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DINO's 0.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SUN currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs CAPL's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.23x | 0.13x | 0.06x | 0.31x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $609.82 | $70.00 | $23.62 | $74.72 | $258.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $345.23 | $47.98 | $19.61 | $32.39 | $115.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +96.9% | +90.2% | +94.3% | +91.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.0 | 52.5 | 41.3 | 68.3 | 47.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 354K | 471K | 50K | 2.7M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAPL and VLO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MUSA as "Hold", SUN as "Hold", CAPL as "Hold", DINO as "Buy", VLO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.3% upside for SUN (target: $68) vs -13.2% for MUSA (target: $504). For income investors, CAPL offers the higher dividend yield at 9.86% vs MUSA's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $504.25 | $68.00 | — | $61.57 | $214.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 24 | 15 | 16 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +7.1% | +9.9% | +2.9% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.13 | $4.79 | $2.10 | $2.02 | $4.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.8% | +3.7% |
DINO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
MUSA vs SUN vs CAPL vs DINO vs VLO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MUSA or SUN or CAPL or DINO or VLO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunoco LP (SUN) is the stronger pick with 11.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 6% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). Sunoco LP (SUN) offers the better valuation at 18. 5x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MUSA or SUN or CAPL or DINO or VLO?
On trailing P/E, Sunoco LP (SUN) is the cheapest at 18.
5x versus Valero Energy Corporation at 31. 2x. On forward P/E, Sunoco LP is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sunoco LP wins at 0. 53x versus Murphy USA Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MUSA or SUN or CAPL or DINO or VLO?
Over the past 5 years, Murphy USA Inc.
(MUSA) delivered a total return of +318. 2%, compared to +56. 1% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MUSA returned +803. 3% versus CAPL's +87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MUSA or SUN or CAPL or DINO or VLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Murphy USA Inc.
(MUSA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 23β versus HF Sinclair Corporation's 0. 31β — meaning DINO is approximately -234% more volatile than MUSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 5% for Murphy USA Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MUSA or SUN or CAPL or DINO or VLO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunoco LP (SUN) is pulling ahead at 11.
1% versus -10. 6% for CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HF Sinclair Corporation grew EPS 241. 8% year-over-year, compared to -39. 0% for Sunoco LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, SUN leads at -0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MUSA or SUN or CAPL or DINO or VLO?
Murphy USA Inc.
(MUSA) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 4% net margin versus 1. 1% for CrossAmerica Partners LP — meaning it keeps 2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAPL leads at 5. 6% versus 3. 5% for DINO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAPL leads at 9. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MUSA or SUN or CAPL or DINO or VLO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sunoco LP (SUN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus Murphy USA Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sunoco LP (SUN) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for CrossAmerica Partners LP — 40. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SUN: 0. 3% to $68. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MUSA or SUN or CAPL or DINO or VLO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) offers the highest yield at 9. 9%, versus 0. 4% for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA).
09Is MUSA or SUN or CAPL or DINO or VLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Murphy USA Inc.
(MUSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 23), +803. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MUSA: +803. 3%, DINO: +202. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MUSA and SUN and CAPL and DINO and VLO?
These companies operate in different sectors (MUSA (Consumer Cyclical) and SUN (Energy) and CAPL (Energy) and DINO (Energy) and VLO (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MUSA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CAPL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DINO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SUN, CAPL, DINO, VLO pay a dividend while MUSA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.