MUX vs LIN vs ECL vs CAT vs SHW

For growth investors, McEwen Mining Inc.

(MUX) is the stronger pick with 13. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) offers the better valuation at 31. 2x trailing P/E (27. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the cheapest at 31.

2x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, McEwen Mining Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Linde plc wins at 1. 09x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 94x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to +16. 1% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus MUX's -0. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

24β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 541% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for The Sherwin-Williams Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), McEwen Mining Inc.

(MUX) is pulling ahead at 13. 2% versus 2. 1% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McEwen Mining Inc. grew EPS 168. 6% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MUX leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus 10. 9% for The Sherwin-Williams Company — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus -6. 5% for MUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Linde plc (LIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 09x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 94x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) trades at 22. 2x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 16. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MUX: 28. 4% to $30. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Linde plc (LIN) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 2% for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, MUX: -0. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MUX (Basic Materials) and LIN (Basic Materials) and ECL (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials) and SHW (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

LIN, ECL, CAT, SHW pay a dividend while MUX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.