Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MVBF vs UVSP vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
MVBF vs UVSP vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $339M | $1.10B | $2.35B | $203M | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $270M | $518M | $867M | $90M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $91M | $169M | $14M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 71.7% | 61.0% | 72.1% | 54.7% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 13.6% | 21.9% | 25.3% | 7.0% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.2x | 11.1x | 10.8x | 11.8x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $77M | $352M | $327M | $52M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $244M | $554M | $185M | $119M | $599M |
MVBF vs UVSP vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) | 100 | 185.8 | +85.8% |
| Univest Financial C… (UVSP) | 100 | 234.7 | +134.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MVBF vs UVSP vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MVBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 34.6%
- NIM 3.2% vs UVSP's 2.8%
- 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- +53.4% vs FIS's -35.3%
Among these 5 stocks, UVSP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 19.5% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs UVSP's 140.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs UVSP's 1.01, lower leverage
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- PEG 0.31 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.5% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs UVSP's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.0% |
MVBF vs UVSP vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MVBF vs UVSP vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 1 of 6 categories
MVBF leads 1 • UVSP leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 121.0x CZWI's $90M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $270M | $518M | $867M | $90M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | $119M | $241M | $9M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $91M | $169M | $14M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $92M | $225M | $11M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.7% | +61.0% | +72.1% | +54.7% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +21.9% | +25.3% | +7.0% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +17.5% | +19.5% | +16.0% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +18.7% | +25.2% | +11.5% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.6% | +23.1% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, UVSP trades at a 81% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UVSP offers better value at 0.84x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $339M | $1.1B | $2.4B | $203M | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $172M | $897M | $2.5B | $136M | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.81x | 12.21x | 13.53x | 14.44x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.23x | 11.10x | 10.80x | 11.78x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.84x | 1.92x | 2.85x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.67x | 7.49x | 10.35x | 15.28x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.25x | 2.12x | 2.71x | 2.25x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 1.18x | 1.21x | 1.09x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 160.42x | 11.34x | 10.75x | 19.55x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UVSP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UVSP delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UVSP's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MVBF scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +9.8% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +6.5% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +8.8% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.37x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$167M | -$202M | $142M | -$67M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $244M | $554M | $185M | $119M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77M | $352M | $327M | $52M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.54x | 0.60x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, MVBF leads with a +53.4% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.3% | +20.9% | +9.3% | +21.5% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.4% | +32.0% | +9.0% | +45.6% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.3% | +137.1% | +54.1% | +160.0% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.7% | +46.4% | +29.9% | +71.2% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.5% | +140.1% | +102.2% | +157.0% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +33.4% | +15.5% | +37.5% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UVSP and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UVSP's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UVSP currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 1.01x | 0.89x | 0.46x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.59 | $39.06 | $46.92 | $22.62 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.13 | $27.91 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.2% | +98.8% | +96.1% | +93.2% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 68.1 | 57.3 | 63.7 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34K | 180K | 236K | 40K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MVBF as "Buy", UVSP as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -11.9% for UVSP (target: $34). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $34.00 | $46.00 | — | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +2.3% | +3.2% | +1.8% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.66 | $0.88 | $1.43 | $0.37 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +3.2% | +0.4% | +3.1% | 0.0% |
NBTB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MVBF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MVBF vs UVSP vs NBTB vs CZWI vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MVBF or UVSP or NBTB or CZWI or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MVBF or UVSP or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MVBF or UVSP or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MVBF or UVSP or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Univest Financial Corporation's 1. 01β — meaning UVSP is approximately 121% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 37% for Univest Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MVBF or UVSP or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MVB Financial Corp. grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MVBF or UVSP or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MVBF or UVSP or NBTB or CZWI or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for MVB Financial Corp. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — MVBF or UVSP or NBTB or CZWI or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is MVBF or UVSP or NBTB or CZWI or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, UVSP: +140. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MVBF and UVSP and NBTB and CZWI and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MVBF (Financial Services) and UVSP (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock; UVSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.