Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MXCT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs BTBT vs BNTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Financial - Capital Markets
Biotechnology
MXCT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs BTBT vs BNTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Financial - Capital Markets | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $93M | $1.50B | $19.25B | $589M | $23.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33M | $596M | $2.23B | $164M | $2.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-45M | $-88M | $-3.19B | $137M | $-1.13B |
| Gross Margin | 81.2% | 84.6% | -13.9% | 61.9% | 77.7% |
| Operating Margin | -138.3% | -11.2% | -153.3% | 16.8% | -45.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 3.6x | — | 9.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $18M | $249M | $1.92B | $14M | $267M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $241M | $2.60B | $95M | $7.67B |
MXCT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs BTBT vs BNTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaxCyte, Inc. (MXCT) | 100 | 5.1 | -94.9% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 5.1 | -94.9% |
| Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) | 100 | 13.7 | -86.3% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 20.3 | -79.7% |
| BioNTech SE (BNTX) | 100 | 28.3 | -71.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MXCT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs BTBT vs BNTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, MXCT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NVAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- Better valuation composite
MRNA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +101.7% vs MXCT's -68.2%
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs MRNA's -39.2%
- 17.3% margin vs MRNA's -143.6%
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 19.0% ROA vs MRNA's -26.6%, ROIC 6.5% vs -26.1%
BNTX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.14
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs MRNA's 161.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 7.54x
- Beta 1.14, current ratio 7.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs MRNA's -39.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs MRNA's -143.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs BTBT's 3.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +101.7% vs MXCT's -68.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs MRNA's -26.6%, ROIC 6.5% vs -26.1% |
MXCT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs BTBT vs BNTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MXCT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs BTBT vs BNTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
NVAX leads 1 • MXCT leads 0 • MRNA leads 0 • BNTX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BNTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 86.6x MXCT's $33M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRNA's -143.6%. On growth, MRNA holds the edge at +2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33M | $596M | $2.2B | $164M | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | -$47M | -$3.2B | $166M | -$931M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$45M | -$88M | -$3.2B | $137M | -$1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$36M | -$96M | -$1.6B | -$448M | $277M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.2% | +84.6% | -13.9% | +61.9% | +77.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -138.3% | -11.2% | -153.3% | +16.8% | -45.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -135.1% | -14.7% | -143.6% | +17.3% | -39.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -109.5% | -16.1% | -71.1% | -65.3% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | -79.1% | +2.6% | — | -24.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -102.0% | -34.9% | +2.8% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NVAX leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 60% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 8.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $93M | $1.5B | $19.3B | $589M | $23.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $91M | $1.5B | $18.6B | $508M | $14.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.08x | 3.63x | -6.69x | 9.15x | -17.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.56x | — | 8.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.81x | 1.34x | 9.90x | 3.60x | 7.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | — | 2.18x | 0.56x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 74.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-37 for MRNA. BNTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRNA's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs MXCT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.1% | — | -36.7% | +21.4% | -6.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.6% | -7.4% | -26.6% | +19.0% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.7% | — | -26.1% | +6.5% | -4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.2% | +100.4% | -27.6% | +8.5% | -3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | — | 0.22x | 0.03x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $8M | -$679M | -$81M | -$7.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $241M | $2.6B | $95M | $7.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $249M | $1.9B | $14M | $267M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -5.10x | -1803.00x | — | -62.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NVAX and MRNA and BNTX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BNTX five years ago would be worth $5,178 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $513 for MXCT. Over the past 12 months, MRNA leads with a +101.7% total return vs MXCT's -68.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVAX at 7.4% vs MXCT's -43.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -43.8% | +29.5% | +57.3% | -10.3% | -3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -68.2% | +55.1% | +101.7% | -9.0% | +0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.6% | +23.9% | -63.2% | -19.7% | -13.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -94.8% | -70.2% | -84.6% | -48.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -90.4% | +161.0% | -60.4% | +568.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.1% | +7.4% | -28.3% | -7.1% | -4.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MRNA and BNTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BNTX is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRNA currently trades 81.5% from its 52-week high vs MXCT's 30.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 2.11x | 1.82x | 3.37x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.86 | $11.97 | $59.55 | $4.55 | $124.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.66 | $5.80 | $22.28 | $1.25 | $79.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.5% | +77.1% | +81.5% | +40.2% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 64.4 | 47.0 | 69.1 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 847K | 4.4M | 6.9M | 18.5M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NVAX and BNTX each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVAX as "Buy", MRNA as "Hold", BTBT as "Buy", BNTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs -25.8% for MRNA (target: $36). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $36.00 | $5.00 | $137.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 27 | 2 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NVAX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
MXCT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs BTBT vs BNTX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MXCT or NVAX or MRNA or BTBT or BNTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 2% for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MXCT or NVAX or MRNA or BTBT or BNTX?
On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MXCT or NVAX or MRNA or BTBT or BNTX?
Over the past 5 years, BioNTech SE (BNTX) delivered a total return of -48.
2%, compared to -94. 9% for MaxCyte, Inc. (MXCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BNTX returned +568. 1% versus MXCT's -94. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MXCT or NVAX or MRNA or BTBT or BNTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioNTech SE (BNTX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
14β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 195% more volatile than BNTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioNTech SE (BNTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 22% for Moderna, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MXCT or NVAX or MRNA or BTBT or BNTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -39. 2% for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -62. 8% for BioNTech SE. Over a 3-year CAGR, MXCT leads at -9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MXCT or NVAX or MRNA or BTBT or BNTX?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -145. 2% for Moderna, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -158. 1% for MRNA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MXCT or NVAX or MRNA or BTBT or BNTX?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. MXCT, NVAX, MRNA, BNTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MXCT or NVAX or MRNA or BTBT or BNTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BioNTech SE (BNTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
14), +568. 1% 10Y return). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BNTX: +568. 1%, NVAX: -90. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MXCT and NVAX and MRNA and BTBT and BNTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (MXCT (Healthcare) and NVAX (Healthcare) and MRNA (Healthcare) and BTBT (Financial Services) and BNTX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MXCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; MRNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BNTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.