Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NAII vs USNA vs NATR vs MGPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
NAII vs USNA vs NATR vs MGPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries |
| Market Cap | $26M | $359M | $430M | $408M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $131M | $925M | $490M | $521M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $11M | $20M | $-240M |
| Gross Margin | 8.5% | 76.6% | 69.9% | 36.4% |
| Operating Margin | -6.1% | 5.5% | 5.7% | -51.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.2x | 21.9x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $59M | $14M | $19M | $267M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $158M | $94M | $18M |
NAII vs USNA vs NATR vs MGPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Alternative… (NAII) | 100 | 40.1 | -59.9% |
| USANA Health Scienc… (USNA) | 100 | 23.0 | -77.0% |
| Nature's Sunshine P… (NATR) | 100 | 253.1 | +153.1% |
| MGP Ingredients, In… (MGPI) | 100 | 50.9 | -49.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAII vs USNA vs NATR vs MGPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth -85.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.8%
- 14.1% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8%
USNA is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 21.9x)
NATR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 180.2% 10Y total return vs MGPI's -17.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, Low D/E 11.7%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 0.62, current ratio 2.28x
- 4.1% margin vs MGPI's -46.0%
MGPI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 2.5%
- 2.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 21.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs MGPI's -46.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs USNA's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +85.3% vs MGPI's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs MGPI's -19.1%, ROIC 21.0% vs -6.7% |
NAII vs USNA vs NATR vs MGPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NAII vs USNA vs NATR vs MGPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NATR leads in 4 of 6 categories
MGPI leads 1 • NAII leads 0 • USNA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NATR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USNA is the larger business by revenue, generating $925M annually — 7.0x NAII's $131M. NATR is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGPI's -46.0%. On growth, NATR holds the edge at +8.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $131M | $925M | $490M | $521M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $91M | $38M | -$249M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $11M | $20M | -$240M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $9M | $23M | $54M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +76.6% | +69.9% | +36.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +5.5% | +5.7% | -51.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.6% | +1.2% | +4.1% | -46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +0.9% | +4.7% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +5.9% | +8.5% | -12.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.5% | -142.2% | +16.0% | -44.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NAII and USNA and MGPI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.2x trailing earnings, NATR trades at a 31% valuation discount to USNA's 33.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, USNA's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NATR's 9.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26M | $359M | $430M | $408M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $73M | $215M | $355M | $656M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.20x | 33.55x | 23.16x | -3.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.18x | 21.92x | 12.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.37x | 9.20x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 0.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.24x | 0.62x | 2.81x | 0.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.24x | 42.13x | 14.90x | 5.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NATR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NATR delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-32 for MGPI. USNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAII's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), USNA scores 7/9 vs MGPI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.6% | +1.8% | +12.1% | -32.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.5% | +1.5% | +7.6% | -19.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.3% | +8.6% | +21.0% | -6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.6% | +8.3% | +13.8% | -8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.86x | 0.02x | 0.12x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | -$144M | -$75M | $248M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $158M | $94M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $59M | $14M | $19M | $267M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.34x | 50.32x | 1100.81x | -40.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NATR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NATR five years ago would be worth $11,883 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,839 for NAII. Over the past 12 months, NATR leads with a +85.3% total return vs MGPI's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NATR at 31.8% vs MGPI's -41.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.7% | +0.1% | +17.1% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.2% | -31.4% | +85.3% | -38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.6% | -70.7% | +129.0% | -79.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.6% | -80.0% | +18.8% | -66.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.2% | -68.7% | +180.2% | -17.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.3% | -33.6% | +31.8% | -41.3% |
Risk & Volatility
NATR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NATR is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USNA's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NATR currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs USNA's 50.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.34x | 0.62x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.96 | $38.32 | $28.14 | $34.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.33 | $16.60 | $12.90 | $16.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.2% | +50.8% | +87.2% | +54.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 59.0 | 49.6 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 118K | 103K | 279K |
Analyst Outlook
MGPI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USNA as "Hold", NATR as "Buy", MGPI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.9% upside for USNA (target: $35) vs -20.6% for NATR (target: $20). MGPI is the only dividend payer here at 2.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.00 | $19.50 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 4 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +7.7% | +3.8% | +0.3% |
NATR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MGPI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
NAII vs USNA vs NATR vs MGPI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAII or USNA or NATR or MGPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Natural Alternatives International, Inc.
(NAII) is the stronger pick with 14. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NATR) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (21. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NATR) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAII or USNA or NATR or MGPI?
On trailing P/E, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
(NATR) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus USANA Health Sciences, Inc. at 33. 6x. On forward P/E, USANA Health Sciences, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAII or USNA or NATR or MGPI?
Over the past 5 years, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
(NATR) delivered a total return of +18. 8%, compared to -81. 6% for Natural Alternatives International, Inc. (NAII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NATR returned +180. 2% versus NAII's -76. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAII or USNA or NATR or MGPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
(NATR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus USANA Health Sciences, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning USNA is approximately 116% more volatile than NATR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, USANA Health Sciences, Inc. (USNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 86% for Natural Alternatives International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAII or USNA or NATR or MGPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Natural Alternatives International, Inc.
(NAII) is pulling ahead at 14. 1% versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to -419. 9% for MGP Ingredients, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NATR leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAII or USNA or NATR or MGPI?
Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
(NATR) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 1% net margin versus -20. 1% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USNA leads at 5. 5% versus -17. 6% for MGPI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USNA leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAII or USNA or NATR or MGPI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, USANA Health Sciences, Inc.
(USNA) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USNA: 79. 9% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAII or USNA or NATR or MGPI?
In this comparison, MGPI (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. NAII, USNA, NATR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NAII or USNA or NATR or MGPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MGP Ingredients, Inc.
(MGPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGPI: -17. 3%, USNA: -68. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAII and USNA and NATR and MGPI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MGPI pays a dividend while NAII, USNA, NATR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.