Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NAK logo
NAK
TECK logo
TECK
FCX logo
FCX
SCCO logo
SCCO
HBM logo
HBM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAK vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+42.7%
TECK
Teck Resources Limited

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$31.22B
5Y Perf.+522.3%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$98.32B
5Y Perf.+491.3%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$156.78B
5Y Perf.+401.3%
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$11.04B
5Y Perf.+818.2%

NAK vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAK logoNAK
TECK logoTECK
FCX logoFCX
SCCO logoSCCO
HBM logoHBM
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsCopperCopperCopper
Market Cap$1.14B$31.22B$98.32B$156.78B$11.04B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$12.41B$26.42B$13.42B$2.22B
Net Income (TTM)$-40M$1.85B$2.73B$4.33B$570M
Gross Margin30.3%27.8%56.7%32.5%
Operating Margin23.9%27.8%52.2%41.4%
Forward P/E13.3x25.7x26.2x17.0x
Total Debt$3M$10.39B$11.50B$7.41B$1.09B
Cash & Equiv.$55M$5.01B$3.35B$4.30B$568M

NAK vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAK
TECK
FCX
SCCO
HBM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Northern Dynasty Mi… (NAK)100142.7+42.7%
Teck Resources Limi… (TECK)100622.3+522.3%
Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX)100591.3+491.3%
Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO)100501.3+401.3%
Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM)100918.2+818.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAK vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SCCO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Teck Resources Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. NAK and HBM also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇SCCO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
The Growth Leader

NAK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 43.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
Best for: growth
TECK
Teck Resources Limited
The Income Pick

TECK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.11, yield 0.5%
  • Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.11, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
  • Lower P/E (13.3x vs 17.0x)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
The Value Pick

FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.86 vs SCCO's 1.25
Best for: valuation efficiency
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 7.6% 10Y total return vs NAK's 5.1%
  • Beta 2.31, yield 1.6%, current ratio 3.89x
  • 32.3% margin vs NAK's -0.3%
  • 1.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TECK's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
The Momentum Pick

HBM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +189.7% vs NAK's +65.9%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNAK logoNAK43.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
ValueTECK logoTECKLower P/E (13.3x vs 17.0x)
Quality / MarginsSCCO logoSCCO32.3% margin vs NAK's -0.3%
Stability / SafetyTECK logoTECKBeta 2.11 vs HBM's 2.49
DividendsSCCO logoSCCO1.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TECK's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HBM logoHBM+189.7% vs NAK's +65.9%
Efficiency (ROA)SCCO logoSCCO21.4% ROA vs NAK's -32.3%, ROIC 38.6% vs -68.7%

NAK vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Critical Minerals Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Critical Minerals Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
NAKNorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

TECKTeck Resources Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc.
FY 2025
Copper Cathode
31.4%$8.1B
Copper In Concentrates
24.3%$6.3B
Refined Copper Products
17.0%$4.4B
Gold
15.0%$3.9B
Molybdenum
7.6%$2.0B
Other Products Or Services
2.9%$749M
Purchased Copper
1.7%$449M
SCCOSouthern Copper Corporation
FY 2025
Copper
74.8%$10.0B
Molybdenum
10.5%$1.4B
Silver
7.3%$974M
Zinc
3.9%$530M
Other
3.6%$477M
HBMHudbay Minerals Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NAK vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSCCOLAGGINGFCX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FCX and NAK operate at a comparable scale, with $26.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$12.4B$26.4B$13.4B$2.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$22M$4.8B$9.6B$7.9B$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$40M$1.8B$2.7B$4.3B$570M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$23M$482M$6.2B$3.4B$215M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.3%+27.8%+56.7%+32.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.9%+27.8%+52.2%+41.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.9%+10.3%+32.3%+25.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.9%+23.6%+25.5%+9.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+72.2%+12.2%+39.0%+26.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+146.8%+128.8%+154.2%+54.5%+5.1%
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — TECK and FCX each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 19.1x trailing earnings, HBM trades at a 58% valuation discount to FCX's 45.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.50x vs SCCO's 1.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$31.2B$98.3B$156.8B$11.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$35.1B$106.5B$159.9B$11.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.01x32.03x45.01x36.22x19.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.35x25.71x26.16x17.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.50x1.73x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.35x12.48x20.32x11.31x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.06x3.82x11.68x5.02x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share88.49x1.73x3.21x14.33x3.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF88.10x45.75x55.79x
Evenly matched — TECK and FCX each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-99 for NAK. NAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs NAK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-98.8%+7.1%+8.9%+42.0%+19.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-32.3%+4.1%+4.7%+21.4%+9.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-68.7%+4.4%+12.8%+38.6%+12.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-40.1%+4.2%+12.4%+39.2%+11.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926585
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.40x0.37x0.67x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$52M$5.4B$8.1B$3.1B$524M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$55M$5.0B$3.4B$4.3B$568M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$10.4B$11.5B$7.4B$1.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-74.40x4.16x17.68x19.33x13.44x
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HBM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HBM five years ago would be worth $40,031 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,050 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, HBM leads with a +189.7% total return vs NAK's +65.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NAK at 110.7% vs TECK's 16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.6%+35.2%+32.3%+29.7%+38.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+65.9%+71.7%+67.6%+104.8%+189.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+834.9%+58.6%+85.6%+197.7%+498.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+270.0%+193.2%+80.5%+230.7%+300.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+514.1%+496.5%+589.8%+762.4%+443.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+110.7%+16.6%+22.9%+43.8%+81.5%
HBM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TECK and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TECK is the less volatile stock with a 2.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBM's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCX currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs NAK's 68.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.42x2.11x2.19x2.31x2.49x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.98$71.25$72.09$223.89$32.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.73$30.98$35.15$87.84$8.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+68.5%+91.0%+94.9%+84.8%+86.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.451.453.749.951.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.9M2.9M12.2M1.3M5.3M
Evenly matched — TECK and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SCCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NAK as "Buy", TECK as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", HBM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for HBM (target: $30) vs -36.3% for NAK (target: $1). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.56% vs TECK's 0.55%.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$1.30$64.50$71.44$156.17$30.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts526413020
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+0.9%+1.6%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1110
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.50$0.60$2.96$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.3%+0.1%0.0%0.0%
SCCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SCCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HBM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallSouthern Copper Corporation (SCCO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAK vs TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAK or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) offers the better valuation at 19. 1x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NAK or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?

On trailing P/E, Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) is the cheapest at 19. 1x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 45. 0x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 86x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NAK or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?

Over the past 5 years, Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) delivered a total return of +300. 3%, compared to +80. 5% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +762. 4% versus HBM's +443. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NAK or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

11β versus Hudbay Minerals Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning HBM is approximately 18% more volatile than TECK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NAK or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.

6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudbay Minerals Inc. grew EPS 630. 0% year-over-year, compared to -182. 7% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HBM leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NAK or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 0. 0% for NAK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NAK or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 86x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for Southern Copper Corporation — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBM: 7. 8% to $30. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NAK or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM?

In this comparison, SCCO (1.

6% yield), FCX (0. 9% yield), TECK (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NAK, HBM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NAK or TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

6% yield, +762. 4% 10Y return). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCO: +762. 4%, HBM: +443. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NAK and TECK and FCX and SCCO and HBM?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HBM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TECK, FCX, SCCO pay a dividend while NAK, HBM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.