Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NATL vs JKHY vs FIS vs FISV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
NATL vs JKHY vs FIS vs FISV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $3.26B | $10.57B | $24.47B | $30.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.38B | $2.52B | $10.89B | $21.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $174M | $519M | $382M | $3.20B |
| Gross Margin | 24.1% | 44.1% | 38.1% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 26.0% | 17.5% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 21.8x | 7.5x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $225M | $0.00 | $4.01B | $29.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $456M | $102M | $599M | $798M |
NATL vs JKHY vs FIS vs FISV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCR Atleos Corporat… (NATL) | 100 | 182.2 | +82.2% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 89.4 | -10.6% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 78.7 | -21.3% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 42.8 | -57.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NATL vs JKHY vs FIS vs FISV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NATL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 99.0% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 94.9%
- +50.3% vs FISV's -68.8%
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
FIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs JKHY's 2.16
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.31
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs NATL's 0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs NATL's 1.16 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.3% vs FISV's -68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.0% |
NATL vs JKHY vs FIS vs FISV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NATL vs JKHY vs FIS vs FISV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories
FISV leads 1 • NATL leads 1 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 8.4x JKHY's $2.5B. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%. On growth, JKHY holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $2.5B | $10.9B | $21.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $357M | $810M | $3.8B | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $174M | $519M | $382M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $82M | $728M | $2.8B | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +44.1% | +38.1% | +60.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +26.0% | +17.5% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +20.6% | +3.5% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +28.9% | +26.1% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.4% | +8.7% | +8.2% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +12.5% | +92.3% | -29.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 86% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $10.6B | $24.5B | $30.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $10.5B | $27.9B | $58.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.68x | 23.40x | 63.00x | 8.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.14x | 21.79x | 7.54x | 7.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.32x | 2.58x | 0.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.02x | 13.53x | 7.66x | 6.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 4.45x | 2.29x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.32x | 5.01x | 1.76x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.66x | 17.97x | 9.97x | 7.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NATL delivers a 47.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NATL scores 6/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +47.0% | +24.0% | +2.7% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +17.0% | +1.1% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.4% | +21.0% | +6.0% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +22.7% | +6.6% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | — | 0.29x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$231M | -$102M | $3.4B | $28.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $456M | $102M | $599M | $798M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $225M | $0 | $4.0B | $29.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.62x | 122.37x | 4.64x | 6.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NATL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NATL five years ago would be worth $19,777 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, NATL leads with a +50.3% total return vs FISV's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NATL at 25.5% vs FISV's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.9% | -17.8% | -27.3% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.3% | -13.6% | -35.3% | -68.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.8% | -1.0% | -6.6% | -52.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.8% | +0.3% | -63.2% | -51.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.0% | +94.9% | -13.2% | +9.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.5% | -0.3% | -2.2% | -22.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NATL and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NATL's 1.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NATL currently trades 91.3% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 0.28x | 0.76x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.50 | $193.39 | $82.74 | $191.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.56 | $141.81 | $43.30 | $52.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +75.5% | +57.1% | +29.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 28.2 | 43.3 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 902K | 5.5M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JKHY and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NATL as "Hold", JKHY as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", FISV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 13.9% for NATL (target: $50). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs JKHY's 1.54%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.40 | $203.75 | $67.38 | $74.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 22 | 37 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | +3.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 32 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.25 | $1.63 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +19.4% |
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NATL vs JKHY vs FIS vs FISV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NATL or JKHY or FIS or FISV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 9% for NCR Atleos Corporation (NATL). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NATL or JKHY or FIS or FISV?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NATL or JKHY or FIS or FISV?
Over the past 5 years, NCR Atleos Corporation (NATL) delivered a total return of +97.
8%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NATL returned +99. 0% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NATL or JKHY or FIS or FISV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus NCR Atleos Corporation's 1. 16β — meaning NATL is approximately 309% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NATL or JKHY or FIS or FISV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus 0. 9% for NCR Atleos Corporation (NATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCR Atleos Corporation grew EPS 74. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NATL or JKHY or FIS or FISV?
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 11. 0% for NATL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FISV leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NATL or JKHY or FIS or FISV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — NATL or JKHY or FIS or FISV?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), JKHY (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NATL, FISV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NATL or JKHY or FIS or FISV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, NATL: +99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NATL and JKHY and FIS and FISV?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NATL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. JKHY, FIS pay a dividend while NATL, FISV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.