Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NEOG vs BCAL vs IDXX vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Banks - Regional
NEOG vs BCAL vs IDXX vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Banks - Regional | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.01B | $613M | $45.45B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $880M | $233M | $4.45B | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-603M | $63M | $1.10B | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 38.0% | 79.4% | 62.1% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | -2.0% | 37.8% | 31.6% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 11.5x | 38.3x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $913M | $72M | $1.08B | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $129M | $52M | $180M | $108M |
NEOG vs BCAL vs IDXX vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neogen Corporation (NEOG) | 100 | 25.4 | -74.6% |
| Southern California… (BCAL) | 100 | 220.0 | +120.0% |
| IDEXX Laboratories,… (IDXX) | 100 | 181.3 | +81.3% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 104.2 | +4.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEOG vs BCAL vs IDXX vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEOG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +56.0% vs CVBF's +13.1%
BCAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
- 133.6% 10Y total return vs IDXX's 5.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 12.4%, current ratio 0.24x
- PEG 0.37 vs CVBF's 4.44
IDXX is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 32.6% ROA vs NEOG's -17.9%, ROIC 42.5% vs 0.2%
CVBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 4.0%
- 32.5% margin vs NEOG's -68.5%
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BCAL's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 14.1x), PEG 0.37 vs 4.44 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs NEOG's -68.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs NEOG's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BCAL's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.0% vs CVBF's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.6% ROA vs NEOG's -17.9%, ROIC 42.5% vs 0.2% |
NEOG vs BCAL vs IDXX vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NEOG vs BCAL vs IDXX vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCAL leads 1 • IDXX leads 1 • NEOG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDXX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 19.1x BCAL's $233M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEOG's -68.5%. On growth, IDXX holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $880M | $233M | $4.4B | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $100M | $92M | $1.5B | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$603M | $63M | $1.1B | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $57M | $845M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.0% | +79.4% | +62.1% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +37.8% | +31.6% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -68.5% | +27.1% | +24.6% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +24.4% | +19.0% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.8% | — | +14.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +96.5% | -2.0% | +16.6% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BCAL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, BCAL trades at a 77% valuation discount to IDXX's 43.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCAL offers better value at 0.31x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $613M | $45.4B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $633M | $46.3B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.84x | 9.88x | 43.75x | 13.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.31x | 11.53x | 38.29x | 14.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.31x | 3.06x | 4.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.70x | 7.19x | 31.60x | 13.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.25x | 2.63x | 10.56x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.08x | 28.75x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.77x | 43.14x | 12.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX delivers a 70.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $-29 for NEOG. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IDXX's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCAL scores 7/9 vs NEOG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.6% | +11.4% | +70.9% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.9% | +1.6% | +32.6% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | +10.6% | +42.5% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.2% | +5.0% | +61.4% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.12x | 0.67x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $784M | $20M | $897M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $129M | $52M | $180M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $913M | $72M | $1.1B | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.33x | 1.55x | 35.55x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NEOG and CVBF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BCAL five years ago would be worth $14,274 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,940 for NEOG. Over the past 12 months, NEOG leads with a +56.0% total return vs CVBF's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.7% vs NEOG's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.1% | +3.3% | -14.6% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.0% | +32.9% | +17.6% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.1% | +47.7% | +17.9% | +94.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.6% | +42.7% | +5.1% | +12.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.8% | +133.6% | +556.2% | +67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | +13.9% | +5.6% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCAL and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEOG's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVBF currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs IDXX's 74.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 0.84x | 1.36x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.43 | $20.47 | $769.98 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.53 | $14.07 | $471.74 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.9% | +93.2% | +74.3% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 62.0 | 52.1 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 189K | 533K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CVBF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NEOG as "Hold", BCAL as "Buy", IDXX as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 30.6% upside for IDXX (target: $748) vs 15.4% for BCAL (target: $22). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs BCAL's 0.52%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $22.00 | $747.50 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 3 | 22 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% | — | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.10 | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +2.7% | +2.9% |
CVBF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). BCAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NEOG vs BCAL vs IDXX vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEOG or BCAL or IDXX or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEOG or BCAL or IDXX or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the cheapest at 9.
9x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, Southern California Bancorp is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Southern California Bancorp wins at 0. 37x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEOG or BCAL or IDXX or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) delivered a total return of +42.
7%, compared to -80. 6% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDXX returned +542. 3% versus NEOG's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEOG or BCAL or IDXX or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
84β versus Neogen Corporation's 1. 69β — meaning NEOG is approximately 101% more volatile than BCAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 67% for IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEOG or BCAL or IDXX or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.
2% versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to -114. 6% for Neogen Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEOG leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEOG or BCAL or IDXX or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus -122. 1% for Neogen Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 1. 1% for NEOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEOG or BCAL or IDXX or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 37x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 38. 3x for IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. — 26. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDXX: 30. 6% to $747. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEOG or BCAL or IDXX or CVBF?
In this comparison, CVBF (4.
0% yield), BCAL (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NEOG, IDXX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NEOG or BCAL or IDXX or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
84), 0. 5% yield, +135. 8% 10Y return). Neogen Corporation (NEOG) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCAL: +135. 8%, NEOG: -50. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEOG and BCAL and IDXX and CVBF?
These companies operate in different sectors (NEOG (Healthcare) and BCAL (Financial Services) and IDXX (Healthcare) and CVBF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NEOG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDXX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. BCAL, CVBF pay a dividend while NEOG, IDXX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.