Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NFBK vs NBTB vs TRST vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
NFBK vs NBTB vs TRST vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $588M | $2.35B | $858M | $88.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $251M | $867M | $278M | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $169M | $61M | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 49.1% | 72.1% | 67.1% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 25.3% | 29.2% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 10.8x | 17.1x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $760M | $327M | $193M | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $168M | $185M | $51M | $837M |
NFBK vs NBTB vs TRST vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.5 | +28.5% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 155.7 | +55.7% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 160.2 | +60.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NFBK vs NBTB vs TRST vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NFBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -16.3%
- 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs TRST's 5.8%
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 19.3x)
- 3.7% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 1.53 vs TRST's 4.72
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- NIM 3.1% vs NFBK's 2.0%
TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +60.3% vs ICE's -10.4%
ICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.2%
- 225.3% 10Y total return vs TRST's 97.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs TRST's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs NFBK's 1.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs ICE's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
NFBK vs NBTB vs TRST vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NFBK vs NBTB vs TRST vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • TRST leads 1 • NFBK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 50.3x NFBK's $251M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFBK's 11.9%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $251M | $867M | $278M | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $61M | $241M | $90M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $169M | $61M | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $42M | $225M | $46M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.1% | +72.1% | +67.1% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +25.3% | +29.2% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +19.5% | +22.0% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +25.2% | +16.4% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +68.8% | +39.5% | +44.1% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 50% valuation discount to ICE's 27.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs TRST's 4.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $588M | $2.4B | $858M | $88.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $2.5B | $1000M | $107.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.54x | 13.53x | 14.90x | 27.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.40x | 10.80x | 17.09x | 19.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.92x | 4.11x | 3.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.19x | 10.35x | 11.14x | 16.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.34x | 2.71x | 3.08x | 7.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 1.21x | 1.29x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.64x | 10.75x | 18.75x | 20.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $5 for NFBK. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFBK's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs TRST's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +9.5% | +8.9% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +7.9% | +7.2% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +2.4% | +2.8% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $592M | $142M | $142M | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $168M | $185M | $51M | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $760M | $327M | $193M | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.46x | 1.05x | 0.90x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $14,654 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,018 for NFBK. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs ICE's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRST at 23.5% vs ICE's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.5% | +9.3% | +18.2% | -2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.5% | +9.0% | +60.3% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.7% | +54.1% | +88.2% | +50.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.2% | +29.9% | +46.5% | +43.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | +102.2% | +97.2% | +225.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +15.5% | +23.5% | +14.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFBK and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFBK's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFBK currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 82.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.88x | 0.75x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.21 | $46.92 | $49.11 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.90 | $39.20 | $30.17 | $143.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +96.1% | +98.6% | +82.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 57.3 | 64.5 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 258K | 236K | 112K | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NFBK and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFBK as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", TRST as "Hold", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for ICE (target: $196) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NFBK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs ICE's 1.24%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $46.00 | — | $195.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 10 | 3 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +3.2% | +3.1% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 12 | 8 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.52 | $1.43 | $1.51 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | +0.4% | +4.4% | +1.6% |
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NFBK vs NBTB vs TRST vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NFBK or NBTB or TRST or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NFBK or NBTB or TRST or ICE?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NFBK or NBTB or TRST or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +46.
5%, compared to +0. 2% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +224. 7% versus NFBK's +20. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NFBK or NBTB or TRST or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning NFBK is approximately 204% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 108% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NFBK or NBTB or TRST or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus 5. 8% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrustCo Bank Corp NY grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to -16. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NFBK or NBTB or TRST or ICE?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 11. 9% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 16. 1% for NFBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NFBK or NBTB or TRST or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 72x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 25. 3% to $195. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — NFBK or NBTB or TRST or ICE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 1. 2% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
09Is NFBK or NBTB or TRST or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 1. 2% yield, +224. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +224. 7%, NFBK: +20. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NFBK and NBTB and TRST and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.