Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NFLX vs AAPL vs MSFT vs GOOGL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.03B
5Y Perf.+110.3%
AAPL
Apple Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.22T
5Y Perf.+261.6%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.07T
5Y Perf.+125.8%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.81T
5Y Perf.+455.0%

NFLX vs AAPL vs MSFT vs GOOGL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NFLX logoNFLX
AAPL logoAAPL
MSFT logoMSFT
GOOGL logoGOOGL
IndustryEntertainmentConsumer ElectronicsSoftware - InfrastructureInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$374.03B$4.22T$3.07T$4.81T
Revenue (TTM)$45.18B$451.44B$318.27B$422.57B
Net Income (TTM)$10.98B$122.58B$125.22B$160.21B
Gross Margin48.5%47.9%68.3%60.4%
Operating Margin29.5%32.6%46.8%32.7%
Forward P/E24.8x33.8x24.9x29.6x
Total Debt$14.46B$112.38B$112.18B$59.29B
Cash & Equiv.$9.03B$35.93B$30.24B$30.71B

NFLX vs AAPL vs MSFT vs GOOGLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NFLX
AAPL
MSFT
GOOGL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100210.3+110.3%
Apple Inc. (AAPL)100361.6+261.6%
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT)100225.8+125.8%
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)100555.0+455.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NFLX vs AAPL vs MSFT vs GOOGL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NFLX leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Microsoft Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. AAPL and GOOGL also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Growth Play

NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
  • PEG 0.75 vs AAPL's 1.89
  • 15.9% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
AAPL
Apple Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 11.8% 10Y total return vs GOOGL's 10.0%
  • 34.0% ROA vs MSFT's 19.2%, ROIC 67.4% vs 24.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
The Income Pick

MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
  • Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
  • 39.3% margin vs NFLX's 24.3%
  • 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Momentum Pick

GOOGL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +144.2% vs NFLX's -22.4%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNFLX logoNFLX15.9% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
ValueNFLX logoNFLXLower P/E (24.8x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.75 vs 0.99
Quality / MarginsMSFT logoMSFT39.3% margin vs NFLX's 24.3%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.39 vs GOOGL's 1.26
DividendsMSFT logoMSFT0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GOOGL logoGOOGL+144.2% vs NFLX's -22.4%
Efficiency (ROA)AAPL logoAAPL34.0% ROA vs MSFT's 19.2%, ROIC 67.4% vs 24.9%

NFLX vs AAPL vs MSFT vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B
AAPLApple Inc.
FY 2025
iPhone
50.4%$209.6B
Service
26.2%$109.2B
Wearables, Home and Accessories
8.6%$35.7B
Mac
8.1%$33.7B
iPad
6.7%$28.0B
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation
FY 2025
Server Products And Cloud Services
34.9%$98.4B
Microsoft Three Six Five Commercial Products And Cloud Services
31.2%$87.8B
Gaming
8.3%$23.5B
Linked In Corporation
6.3%$17.8B
Windows
6.1%$17.3B
Search Advertising
4.9%$13.9B
Dynamics Products And Cloud Services
2.8%$7.8B
Other (3)
5.4%$15.2B
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
FY 2025
Google Search & Other
55.7%$224.5B
Google Cloud
14.6%$58.7B
Google Inc.
11.9%$48.0B
YouTube Advertising Revenue
10.0%$40.4B
Google Network
7.4%$29.8B
Other Bets
0.4%$1.5B
Other Segments
-0.0%$-127,000,000

NFLX vs AAPL vs MSFT vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSFTLAGGINGGOOGL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 10.0x NFLX's $45.2B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFLX's 24.3%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$45.2B$451.4B$318.3B$422.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$30.1B$160.0B$192.6B$161.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$11.0B$122.6B$125.2B$160.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9.5B$129.2B$72.9B$73.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.5%+47.9%+68.3%+60.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+29.5%+32.6%+46.8%+32.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+24.3%+27.2%+39.3%+37.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.9%+28.6%+22.9%+17.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+17.6%+16.6%+18.3%+21.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+31.1%+21.8%+23.4%+81.9%
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 30.3x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 21% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Market CapShares × price$374.0B$4.22T$3.07T$4.81T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$379.5B$4.30T$3.16T$4.84T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS34.89x38.53x30.34x36.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.80x33.78x24.91x29.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x2.16x1.61x1.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.61x29.68x19.40x32.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.28x10.14x10.91x11.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share14.32x58.50x8.99x11.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF39.53x42.73x42.93x65.69x
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $33 for MSFT. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs MSFT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+41.3%+146.7%+33.1%+39.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+19.8%+34.0%+19.2%+27.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+29.8%+67.4%+24.9%+25.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+30.5%+69.6%+29.7%+30.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97867
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x1.52x0.33x0.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.4B$76.4B$81.9B$28.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9.0B$35.9B$30.2B$30.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14.5B$112.4B$112.2B$59.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense17.33x55.65x392.15x
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $34,180 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,152 for MSFT. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +144.2% total return vs NFLX's -22.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs MSFT's 11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-3.0%+6.2%-12.3%+26.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-22.4%+45.3%-3.7%+144.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+166.5%+67.4%+37.2%+270.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+76.7%+125.3%+71.5%+241.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+872.1%+1175.4%+768.1%+1001.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+38.6%+18.7%+11.1%+54.8%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NFLX and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOGL's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.39x0.99x0.89x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$134.12$288.61$555.45$399.85
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$75.01$193.25$356.28$147.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+65.8%+99.6%+74.5%+99.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10034.167.352.681.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded44.9M39.6M32.8M28.4M
Evenly matched — NFLX and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.3% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.78% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.

MetricNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$116.29$317.11$551.75$406.28
# AnalystsCovering analysts991108182
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+0.8%+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14192
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.03$3.23$0.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.4%+2.1%+0.6%+0.9%
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). NFLX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMicrosoft Corporation (MSFT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NFLX vs AAPL vs MSFT vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NFLX or AAPL or MSFT or GOOGL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 3x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NFLX or AAPL or MSFT or GOOGL?

On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.

3x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NFLX or AAPL or MSFT or GOOGL?

Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +241. 8%, compared to +71. 5% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1175% versus MSFT's +768. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NFLX or AAPL or MSFT or GOOGL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Alphabet Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning GOOGL is approximately 224% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NFLX or AAPL or MSFT or GOOGL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NFLX or AAPL or MSFT or GOOGL?

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus 24. 3% for Netflix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 29. 5% for NFLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NFLX or AAPL or MSFT or GOOGL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Apple Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 33. 3% to $551. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NFLX or AAPL or MSFT or GOOGL?

In this comparison, MSFT (0.

8% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. NFLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NFLX or AAPL or MSFT or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +872. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +872. 1%, GOOGL: +1002%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NFLX and AAPL and MSFT and GOOGL?

These companies operate in different sectors (NFLX (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology) and MSFT (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. MSFT pays a dividend while NFLX, AAPL, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AAPL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSFT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOOGL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NFLX and AAPL and MSFT and GOOGL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NFLX: 17.6% · AAPL: 16.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(NFLX: 24.3% · AAPL: 27.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(NFLX: 34.9x · AAPL: 38.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.