NMIH vs ACT

For growth investors, NMI Holdings, Inc.

(NMIH) is the stronger pick with 8. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT). NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) offers the better valuation at 7. 7x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, NMI Holdings, Inc.

(NMIH) is the cheapest at 7. 7x versus Enact Holdings, Inc. at 9. 4x. On forward P/E, NMI Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NMI Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Enact Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Enact Holdings, Inc.

(ACT) delivered a total return of +135. 0%, compared to +50. 3% for NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NMIH returned +478. 5% versus ACT's +135. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enact Holdings, Inc.

(ACT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus NMI Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 45β — meaning NMIH is approximately 63% more volatile than ACT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 16% for NMI Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NMI Holdings, Inc.

(NMIH) is pulling ahead at 8. 4% versus 2. 4% for Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NMI Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 11. 1% year-over-year, compared to 3. 4% for Enact Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMIH leads at 10. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NMI Holdings, Inc.

(NMIH) is the more profitable company, earning 55. 1% net margin versus 54. 8% for Enact Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NMIH leads at 70. 8% versus 69. 8% for ACT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMIH leads at 91. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Enact Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 8. 8x for Enact Holdings, Inc. — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMIH: 15. 5% to $43. 50.

In this comparison, ACT (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. NMIH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Enact Holdings, Inc.

(ACT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 9% yield, +135. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACT: +135. 0%, NMIH: +478. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

ACT pays a dividend while NMIH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.