NMIH vs FNF vs FAF vs MTG

For growth investors, First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is the stronger pick with 21.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG). NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) offers the better valuation at 7. 7x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, NMI Holdings, Inc.

(NMIH) is the cheapest at 7. 7x versus First American Financial Corporation at 11. 4x. On forward P/E, NMI Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NMI Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 's 2. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) delivered a total return of +90.

0%, compared to +21. 0% for First American Financial Corporation (FAF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NMIH returned +478. 5% versus FAF's +137. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

43β versus First American Financial Corporation's 0. 59β — meaning FAF is approximately 39% more volatile than MTG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 55% for Fidelity National Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is pulling ahead at 21.

6% versus 0. 5% for MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First American Financial Corporation grew EPS 376. 2% year-over-year, compared to 8. 7% for MGIC Investment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMIH leads at 10. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the more profitable company, earning 60.

8% net margin versus 8. 4% for First American Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 60. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTG leads at 76. 5% versus 11. 1% for FAF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FAF leads at 95. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 's 2. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 10. 7x for First American Financial Corporation — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FNF: 30. 9% to $67. 00.

In this comparison, FNF (3.

8% yield), FAF (3. 1% yield), MTG (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. NMIH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

43), 2. 2% yield, +324. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTG: +324. 6%, NMIH: +478. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NMIH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FNF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FAF is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTG is a small-cap deep-value stock. FNF, FAF, MTG pay a dividend while NMIH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.