Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NTB vs FIBK vs BOKF vs BANR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NTB vs FIBK vs BOKF vs BANR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.21B | $3.37B | $9.94B | $2.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $800M | $1.06B | $3.36B | $819M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $232M | $302M | $537M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 75.9% | 97.5% | 57.1% | 79.0% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | 37.0% | 19.8% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 12.9x | 12.5x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $776M | $4.45B | $373M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.61B | $358M | $1.43B | $183M |
NTB vs FIBK vs BOKF vs BANR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Bank of N.T. Bu… (NTB) | 100 | 226.6 | +126.6% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 253.3 | +153.3% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 171.7 | +71.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTB vs FIBK vs BOKF vs BANR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.3%
- 187.7% 10Y total return vs BOKF's 154.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 516.92x
- PEG 0.65 vs FIBK's 4.23
FIBK is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.5% yield, vs BOKF's 1.7%
BOKF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FIBK's -28.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FIBK's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FIBK's 0.6%
BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.6% vs BOKF's 2.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FIBK's -28.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 10.3x), PEG 0.65 vs 0.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FIBK's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs BOKF's 1.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs BOKF's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.0% vs BANR's +1.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FIBK's 0.6% |
NTB vs FIBK vs BOKF vs BANR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTB vs FIBK vs BOKF vs BANR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NTB leads in 4 of 6 categories
FIBK leads 1 • BOKF leads 0 • BANR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 4.2x NTB's $800M. NTB is the more profitable business, keeping 29.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $800M | $1.1B | $3.4B | $819M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $267M | $428M | $797M | $253M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $232M | $302M | $537M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $255M | $278M | $1.5B | $248M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.9% | +97.5% | +57.1% | +79.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.8% | +37.0% | +19.8% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +28.5% | +15.6% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +26.2% | +42.6% | +30.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +116.0% | +1.8% | +11.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, NTB trades at a 36% valuation discount to BOKF's 15.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTB offers better value at 0.75x vs BOKF's 5.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $3.4B | $9.9B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $644M | $3.8B | $13.0B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.12x | 11.77x | 15.85x | 11.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.76x | 12.91x | 12.55x | 10.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.75x | 3.86x | 5.33x | 0.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.42x | 9.68x | 16.79x | 9.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.76x | 3.19x | 2.96x | 2.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.06x | 1.03x | 1.48x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.68x | 12.14x | 6.95x | 8.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTB delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $9 for FIBK. NTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTB scores 8/9 vs BOKF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.2% | +8.8% | +8.9% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.9% | +5.9% | +4.1% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +4.3% | +5.5% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.23x | 0.80x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | $418M | $3.0B | $190M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $358M | $1.4B | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $776M | $4.5B | $373M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.23x | 1.11x | 0.55x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTB five years ago would be worth $17,083 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,099 for FIBK. Over the past 12 months, NTB leads with a +35.0% total return vs BANR's +1.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTB at 36.6% vs FIBK's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.4% | -1.6% | +9.2% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +2.3% | +33.1% | +1.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.0% | +11.4% | +79.4% | +66.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.8% | +21.0% | +61.8% | +32.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +187.7% | +39.2% | +154.3% | +98.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.6% | +3.7% | +21.5% | +18.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTB currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs FIBK's 88.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | — | 1.00x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.84 | $39.26 | $139.73 | $69.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.59 | $31.62 | $91.35 | $57.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +88.1% | +92.3% | +92.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 50.8 | 41.6 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 145K | 1.2M | 313K | 282K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIBK and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTB as "Hold", FIBK as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", BANR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.8% upside for FIBK (target: $38) vs 2.0% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, FIBK offers the higher dividend yield at 5.46% vs BOKF's 1.74%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $38.33 | $131.57 | $70.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 15 | 21 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +5.5% | +1.7% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.83 | $1.89 | $2.24 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | +3.6% | +0.9% | +1.6% |
NTB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FIBK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
NTB vs FIBK vs BOKF vs BANR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTB or FIBK or BOKF or BANR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTB or FIBK or BOKF or BANR?
On trailing P/E, The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus BOK Financial Corporation at 15. 9x. On forward P/E, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited wins at 0. 65x versus First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 's 4. 23x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTB or FIBK or BOKF or BANR?
Over the past 5 years, The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) delivered a total return of +70. 8%, compared to +21. 0% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTB returned +187. 7% versus FIBK's +39. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTB or FIBK or BOKF or BANR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 00β — meaning BOKF is approximately 55% more volatile than NTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTB or FIBK or BOKF or BANR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.
4% versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. grew EPS 34. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTB or FIBK or BOKF or BANR?
The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 0% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIBK leads at 37. 0% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIBK leads at 97. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTB or FIBK or BOKF or BANR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 65x versus First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 's 4. 23x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIBK: 10. 8% to $38. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTB or FIBK or BOKF or BANR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is NTB or FIBK or BOKF or BANR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 3% yield, +187. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTB: +187. 7%, FIBK: +39. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTB and FIBK and BOKF and BANR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.