Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NTLA vs VRTX vs REGN vs EDIT vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
NTLA vs VRTX vs REGN vs EDIT vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.61B | $108.78B | $74.89B | $311M | $40.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $12.26B | $14.92B | $0.00 | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-413M | $4.34B | $4.42B | $-160M | $577M |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.3% | 84.5% | — | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 39.0% | 24.3% | — | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.3x | 15.6x | — | 45.2x |
| Total Debt | $93M | $3.88B | $2.71B | $18M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $155M | $5.09B | $3.12B | $147M | $1.66B |
NTLA vs VRTX vs REGN vs EDIT vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 148.5 | +48.5% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 11.7 | -88.3% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 224.0 | +124.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTLA vs VRTX vs REGN vs EDIT vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, NTLA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VRTX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 35.4% margin vs ALNY's 13.5%
- 17.1% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2%
REGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- PEG 2.47 vs VRTX's 2.69
- Beta 0.81, yield 0.5%, current ratio 4.13x
- Lower P/E (15.6x vs 45.2x)
EDIT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +138.7% vs VRTX's -5.0%
ALNY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.71
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 445.5% 10Y total return vs VRTX's 399.9%
- 65.2% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.2% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 45.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs ALNY's 13.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs EDIT's 2.52 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +138.7% vs VRTX's -5.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.1% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2% |
NTLA vs VRTX vs REGN vs EDIT vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NTLA vs VRTX vs REGN vs EDIT vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VRTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
REGN leads 1 • ALNY leads 1 • NTLA leads 0 • EDIT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALNY's 13.5%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $12.3B | $14.9B | $0 | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$332M | $4.9B | $4.2B | $0 | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$413M | $4.3B | $4.4B | -$160M | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$355M | $3.7B | $4.2B | -$166M | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +86.3% | +84.5% | — | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +39.0% | +24.3% | — | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +35.4% | +29.6% | — | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +30.3% | +27.9% | — | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | +7.8% | +19.0% | -151.6% | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.2% | +61.4% | -7.2% | +105.5% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
REGN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.4x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 87% valuation discount to ALNY's 130.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), REGN offers better value at 2.75x vs VRTX's 3.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $108.8B | $74.9B | $311M | $40.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $107.6B | $74.5B | $182M | $40.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.64x | 27.91x | 17.38x | -1.76x | 130.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.32x | 15.60x | — | 45.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.37x | 2.75x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.65x | 18.07x | — | 71.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 9.01x | 5.22x | — | 10.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.24x | 5.91x | 2.50x | 10.33x | 51.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 34.06x | 18.35x | — | 86.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-5 for EDIT. REGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.5% | +23.9% | +14.3% | -5.2% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -49.0% | +17.1% | +11.1% | -74.2% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +23.0% | +8.9% | — | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +23.1% | +10.2% | — | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.21x | 0.09x | 0.66x | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$62M | -$1.2B | -$412M | -$129M | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $155M | $5.1B | $3.1B | $147M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $3.9B | $2.7B | $18M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 488.09x | 108.44x | — | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALNY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $22,937 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $925 for EDIT. Over the past 12 months, EDIT leads with a +138.7% total return vs VRTX's -5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALNY at 13.0% vs NTLA's -31.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.4% | -5.4% | -7.0% | +54.9% | -24.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +91.0% | -5.0% | +29.7% | +138.7% | +12.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.9% | +24.3% | -3.6% | -67.0% | +44.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.2% | +100.6% | +45.4% | -90.8% | +129.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.3% | +399.9% | +96.0% | -89.5% | +445.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.6% | +7.5% | -1.2% | -30.9% | +13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — REGN and ALNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REGN currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs NTLA's 49.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.37x | 0.82x | 0.81x | 2.52x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.25 | $507.92 | $821.11 | $4.54 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.83 | $362.50 | $476.49 | $1.29 | $245.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.0% | +84.2% | +87.8% | +69.9% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 40.4 | 37.9 | 53.7 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.2M | 1.2M | 634K | 1.6M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTLA as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 89.0% upside for EDIT (target: $6) vs 20.1% for REGN (target: $866). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.88 | $552.27 | $865.68 | $6.00 | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 56 | 48 | 25 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | +5.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VRTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). REGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NTLA vs VRTX vs REGN vs EDIT vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTLA or VRTX or REGN or EDIT or ALNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 4x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTLA or VRTX or REGN or EDIT or ALNY?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 4x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 130. 0x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. wins at 2. 47x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 69x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTLA or VRTX or REGN or EDIT or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +129. 4%, compared to -90. 8% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +445. 5% versus EDIT's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTLA or VRTX or REGN or EDIT or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning EDIT is approximately 257% more volatile than ALNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTLA or VRTX or REGN or EDIT or ALNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to 8. 2% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTLA or VRTX or REGN or EDIT or ALNY?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus 0. 0% for EDIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REGN leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTLA or VRTX or REGN or EDIT or ALNY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 47x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 69x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 45. 2x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 29. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EDIT: 89. 0% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTLA or VRTX or REGN or EDIT or ALNY?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. NTLA, VRTX, EDIT, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NTLA or VRTX or REGN or EDIT or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +445. 5% 10Y return). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALNY: +445. 5%, EDIT: -89. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTLA and VRTX and REGN and EDIT and ALNY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EDIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.