Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NWFL vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FXNC vs FUNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NWFL vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FXNC vs FUNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $283M | $203M | $2.35B | $253M | $248M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $90M | $867M | $112M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $14M | $169M | $18M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 54.7% | 72.1% | 74.0% | 68.8% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 7.0% | 25.3% | 19.6% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 11.8x | 10.8x | 11.7x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $74M | $52M | $327M | $43M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $119M | $185M | $161M | $78M |
NWFL vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FXNC vs FUNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Norwood Financial C… (NWFL) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWFL vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FXNC vs FUNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWFL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.2%, EPS growth 152.5%
- 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 4.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs NBTB's 0.89
Among these 5 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FXNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
- NIM 3.6% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- +46.9% vs NBTB's +9.0%
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 241.1%
- PEG 0.77 vs FXNC's 7.87
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.77 vs 7.87
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.77 vs 7.87 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.9% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
NWFL vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FXNC vs FUNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NWFL vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FXNC vs FUNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NWFL leads in 1 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • FUNC leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • FXNC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NWFL and FXNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.6x CZWI's $90M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 20.4% (NWFL) to 15.8% (FXNC).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $90M | $867M | $112M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $9M | $241M | $25M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $14M | $169M | $18M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $11M | $225M | $21M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +54.7% | +72.1% | +74.0% | +68.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +7.0% | +25.3% | +19.6% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +16.0% | +19.5% | +15.8% | +18.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +11.5% | +25.2% | +18.7% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +152.6% | +63.0% | +39.5% | +7.1% | +20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NWFL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, NWFL trades at a 30% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.08x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $283M | $203M | $2.4B | $253M | $248M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $313M | $136M | $2.5B | $134M | $357M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.12x | 14.44x | 13.53x | 14.27x | 12.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.89x | 11.78x | 10.80x | 11.75x | 8.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.31x | 2.85x | 1.92x | 9.55x | 1.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.56x | 15.28x | 10.35x | 6.13x | 11.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.08x | 2.25x | 2.71x | 2.25x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 1.09x | 1.21x | 1.35x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.79x | 19.55x | 10.75x | 12.03x | 12.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWFL scores 7/9 vs FUNC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +7.8% | +9.5% | +10.0% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +0.9% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +2.0% | +7.9% | +7.7% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.8% | +0.6% | +2.4% | +9.9% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.28x | 0.17x | 0.23x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | -$67M | $142M | -$118M | $109M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $119M | $185M | $161M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74M | $52M | $327M | $43M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.74x | 0.16x | 1.05x | 0.84x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,989 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +46.9% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs NWFL's 10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +21.5% | +9.3% | +14.6% | +4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.9% | +45.6% | +9.0% | +46.9% | +27.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.0% | +160.0% | +54.1% | +110.8% | +218.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.8% | +71.2% | +29.9% | +68.7% | +134.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.6% | +157.0% | +102.2% | +241.1% | +289.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.0% | +37.5% | +15.5% | +28.2% | +47.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FUNC's 91.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.46x | 0.89x | 0.70x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.23 | $22.62 | $46.92 | $29.85 | $41.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.70 | $12.83 | $39.20 | $18.31 | $28.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +93.2% | +96.1% | +93.7% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 63.7 | 57.3 | 47.6 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 40K | 236K | 80K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWFL and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NWFL as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FXNC as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for NWFL (target: $33) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, NWFL offers the higher dividend yield at 4.09% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.00 | — | $46.00 | $21.00 | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +1.8% | +3.2% | +2.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 7 | 12 | 11 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.25 | $0.37 | $1.43 | $0.61 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.1% | +0.4% | +0.1% | +1.6% |
NWFL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NBTB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
NWFL vs CZWI vs NBTB vs FXNC vs FUNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWFL or CZWI or NBTB or FXNC or FUNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the stronger pick with 34. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWFL or CZWI or NBTB or FXNC or FUNC?
On trailing P/E, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 77x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWFL or CZWI or NBTB or FXNC or FUNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to +29. 9% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWFL or CZWI or NBTB or FXNC or FUNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 94% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWFL or CZWI or NBTB or FXNC or FUNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is pulling ahead at 34. 2% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Norwood Financial Corp. grew EPS 152. 5% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWFL or CZWI or NBTB or FXNC or FUNC?
Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 15. 8% for First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWFL leads at 26. 1% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWFL or CZWI or NBTB or FXNC or FUNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWFL: 7. 6% to $33. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWFL or CZWI or NBTB or FXNC or FUNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is NWFL or CZWI or NBTB or FXNC or FUNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWFL and CZWI and NBTB and FXNC and FUNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NWFL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.