Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NWFL vs FUNC vs CZWI vs FXNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NWFL vs FUNC vs CZWI vs FXNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $283M | $248M | $203M | $253M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $112M | $90M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $25M | $14M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 68.8% | 54.7% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 24.4% | 7.0% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 8.7x | 11.8x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $74M | $188M | $52M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $78M | $119M | $161M |
NWFL vs FUNC vs CZWI vs FXNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Norwood Financial C… (NWFL) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWFL vs FUNC vs CZWI vs FXNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWFL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.2%, EPS growth 152.5%
- 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 4.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2%
FUNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 241.1%
- PEG 0.77 vs FXNC's 7.87
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.77 vs 7.87
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs NWFL's 0.72, lower leverage
FXNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
- NIM 3.6% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- +46.9% vs NWFL's +23.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.77 vs 7.87 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs NWFL's 0.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.9% vs NWFL's +23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
NWFL vs FUNC vs CZWI vs FXNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NWFL vs FUNC vs CZWI vs FXNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NWFL leads in 2 of 6 categories
FXNC leads 1 • FUNC leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWFL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWFL is the larger business by revenue, generating $136M annually — 1.5x CZWI's $90M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 20.4% (NWFL) to 15.8% (FXNC).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $112M | $90M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $36M | $9M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $25M | $14M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $16M | $11M | $21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +68.8% | +54.7% | +74.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +24.4% | +7.0% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +18.4% | +16.0% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +18.2% | +11.5% | +18.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +152.6% | +20.2% | +63.0% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NWFL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, NWFL trades at a 30% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.08x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $283M | $248M | $203M | $253M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $313M | $357M | $136M | $134M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.12x | 12.12x | 14.44x | 14.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.89x | 8.68x | 11.78x | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.31x | 1.08x | 2.85x | 9.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.56x | 11.52x | 15.28x | 6.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.08x | 2.22x | 2.25x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 1.39x | 1.09x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.79x | 12.18x | 19.55x | 12.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWFL scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +12.5% | +7.8% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +5.9% | +2.0% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.8% | +8.5% | +0.6% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 1.05x | 0.28x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | $109M | -$67M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $78M | $119M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74M | $188M | $52M | $43M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.74x | 1.01x | 0.16x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,579 for NWFL. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +46.9% total return vs NWFL's +23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs NWFL's 10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +4.4% | +21.5% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.9% | +27.8% | +45.6% | +46.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.0% | +218.6% | +160.0% | +110.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.8% | +134.5% | +71.2% | +68.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.6% | +289.2% | +157.0% | +241.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.0% | +47.1% | +37.5% | +28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NWFL and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWFL's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWFL currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs FUNC's 91.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.72x | 0.46x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.23 | $41.95 | $22.62 | $29.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.70 | $28.00 | $12.83 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +91.0% | +93.2% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 50.6 | 63.7 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 11K | 40K | 80K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWFL and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NWFL as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for NWFL (target: $33) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, NWFL offers the higher dividend yield at 4.09% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.00 | $25.00 | — | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +2.2% | +1.8% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 7 | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.25 | $0.82 | $0.37 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.6% | +3.1% | +0.1% |
NWFL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FXNC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
NWFL vs FUNC vs CZWI vs FXNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWFL or FUNC or CZWI or FXNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the stronger pick with 34. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWFL or FUNC or CZWI or FXNC?
On trailing P/E, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 77x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWFL or FUNC or CZWI or FXNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to +45. 8% for Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus NWFL's +120. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWFL or FUNC or CZWI or FXNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Norwood Financial Corp. 's 0. 72β — meaning NWFL is approximately 57% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWFL or FUNC or CZWI or FXNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is pulling ahead at 34. 2% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Norwood Financial Corp. grew EPS 152. 5% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWFL or FUNC or CZWI or FXNC?
Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 15. 8% for First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWFL leads at 26. 1% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWFL or FUNC or CZWI or FXNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWFL: 7. 6% to $33. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWFL or FUNC or CZWI or FXNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is NWFL or FUNC or CZWI or FXNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, NWFL: +120. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWFL and FUNC and CZWI and FXNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NWFL is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.