Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NWG vs HSBC vs BCS vs LYG vs DB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NWG vs HSBC vs BCS vs LYG vs DB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $30.60B | $305.76B | $79.93B | $77.17B | $60.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29.48B | $147.86B | $26.82B | $65.00B | $60.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.83B | $22.29B | $7.05B | $4.66B | $6.93B |
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 54.6% | 108.6% | 29.9% | 49.9% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 20.3% | 37.3% | 10.2% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 10.7x | 10.9x | 12.6x | 9.3x |
| Total Debt | $71.83B | $495.79B | $219.94B | $95.14B | $254.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85.35B | $286.92B | $229.75B | $56.66B | $171.62B |
NWG vs HSBC vs BCS vs LYG vs DB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NatWest Group plc (NWG) | 100 | 514.0 | +414.0% |
| HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) | 100 | 386.0 | +286.0% |
| Barclays PLC (BCS) | 100 | 411.5 | +311.5% |
| Lloyds Banking Grou… (LYG) | 100 | 374.1 | +274.1% |
| Deutsche Bank AG (DB) | 100 | 374.6 | +274.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWG vs HSBC vs BCS vs LYG vs DB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 10.3%
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth 27.4%
- NIM 1.8% vs BCS's 0.9%
- 10.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BCS's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HSBC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 264.7% 10Y total return vs NWG's 192.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 2.62x
- Beta 1.12, yield 3.7%, current ratio 2.62x
- +64.7% vs DB's +20.9%
Among these 5 stocks, BCS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LYG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 72.8% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 1.05 vs DB's 1.48, lower leverage
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7%
DB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.08 vs LYG's 0.31
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 12.6x), PEG 0.08 vs 0.31
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 72.8% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 12.6x), PEG 0.08 vs 0.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs DB's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BCS's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.7% vs DB's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% |
NWG vs HSBC vs BCS vs LYG vs DB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NWG leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCS leads 1 • HSBC leads 1 • LYG leads 0 • DB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.9B annually — 5.5x BCS's $26.8B. BCS is the more profitable business, keeping 26.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYG's 7.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29.5B | $147.9B | $26.8B | $65.0B | $60.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.9B | $35.8B | $9.0B | $6.7B | $9.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.8B | $22.3B | $7.1B | $4.7B | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.3% | +54.6% | +108.6% | +29.9% | +49.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +20.3% | +37.3% | +10.2% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +15.1% | +26.7% | +7.2% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +17.0% | -30.1% | -1.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | +23.5% | +36.0% | +141.8% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NWG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.2x trailing earnings, NWG trades at a 72% valuation discount to HSBC's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DB offers better value at 0.08x vs LYG's 0.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.6B | $305.8B | $79.9B | $77.2B | $60.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.2B | $514.6B | $66.6B | $129.5B | $158.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.19x | 14.71x | 10.44x | 14.37x | 8.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.57x | 10.75x | 10.90x | 12.65x | 9.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.33x | 0.28x | 0.35x | 0.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.01x | 16.11x | 4.66x | 14.30x | 13.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 2.07x | 2.19x | 0.87x | 0.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 1.69x | 0.80x | 1.21x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.89x | 12.18x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NWG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWG delivers a 13.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $9 for DB. NWG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DB's 3.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWG scores 7/9 vs BCS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | +11.4% | +9.2% | +9.9% | +8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +0.7% | +0.4% | +0.5% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +4.0% | +2.7% | +3.6% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +1.4% | +1.2% | +1.6% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 2.68x | 2.81x | 1.99x | 3.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13.5B | $208.9B | -$9.8B | $38.5B | $83.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85.3B | $286.9B | $229.8B | $56.7B | $171.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $71.8B | $495.8B | $219.9B | $95.1B | $254.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.60x | 0.47x | 0.42x | 0.39x | 0.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSBC five years ago would be worth $32,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,158 for LYG. Over the past 12 months, HSBC leads with a +64.7% total return vs DB's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCS at 46.5% vs LYG's 35.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.3% | +13.4% | -9.4% | +0.4% | -20.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.0% | +64.7% | +49.0% | +41.1% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.1% | +162.1% | +214.4% | +150.1% | +210.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.0% | +225.7% | +146.3% | +131.6% | +135.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.4% | +264.7% | +187.7% | +77.6% | +101.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.7% | +37.9% | +46.5% | +35.7% | +45.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HSBC and LYG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYG is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DB's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSBC currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs DB's 77.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.12x | 1.39x | 1.05x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.36 | $94.80 | $27.70 | $6.34 | $40.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.76 | $56.21 | $15.88 | $3.81 | $26.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +93.9% | +84.1% | +83.2% | +77.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 57.3 | 60.1 | 53.4 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 2.0M | 8.2M | 20.8M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWG and BCS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NWG as "Buy", HSBC as "Hold", BCS as "Buy", LYG as "Buy", DB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 88.9% upside for BCS (target: $44) vs -52.7% for DB (target: $15). For income investors, NWG offers the higher dividend yield at 10.35% vs LYG's 3.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $52.00 | $44.00 | $2.75 | $14.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 19 | 24 | 24 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.3% | +3.7% | +3.5% | +3.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.17 | $3.30 | $0.61 | $0.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.4% | +4.1% | +10.4% | +2.9% | 0.0% |
NWG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BCS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
NWG vs HSBC vs BCS vs LYG vs DB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWG or HSBC or BCS or LYG or DB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is the stronger pick with 72.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). NatWest Group plc (NWG) offers the better valuation at 4. 2x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NatWest Group plc (NWG) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWG or HSBC or BCS or LYG or DB?
On trailing P/E, NatWest Group plc (NWG) is the cheapest at 4.
2x versus HSBC Holdings plc at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, Deutsche Bank AG is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Deutsche Bank AG wins at 0. 08x versus Lloyds Banking Group plc's 0. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWG or HSBC or BCS or LYG or DB?
Over the past 5 years, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) delivered a total return of +225.
7%, compared to +131. 6% for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSBC returned +264. 7% versus LYG's +77. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWG or HSBC or BCS or LYG or DB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
05β versus Deutsche Bank AG's 1. 48β — meaning DB is approximately 40% more volatile than LYG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NatWest Group plc (NWG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 169% versus 3% for Deutsche Bank AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWG or HSBC or BCS or LYG or DB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is pulling ahead at 72.
8% versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deutsche Bank AG grew EPS 125. 5% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for HSBC Holdings plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWG or HSBC or BCS or LYG or DB?
Barclays PLC (BCS) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
7% net margin versus 7. 2% for Lloyds Banking Group plc — meaning it keeps 26. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCS leads at 37. 3% versus 10. 2% for LYG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCS leads at 108. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWG or HSBC or BCS or LYG or DB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 08x versus Lloyds Banking Group plc's 0. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Lloyds Banking Group plc — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCS: 88. 9% to $44. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWG or HSBC or BCS or LYG or DB?
In this comparison, NWG (10.
3% yield), HSBC (3. 7% yield), BCS (3. 5% yield), LYG (3. 4% yield) pay a dividend. DB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NWG or HSBC or BCS or LYG or DB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 3. 7% yield, +264. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSBC: +264. 7%, DB: +101. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWG and HSBC and BCS and LYG and DB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NWG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HSBC is a large-cap deep-value stock; BCS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LYG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DB is a mid-cap deep-value stock. NWG, HSBC, BCS, LYG pay a dividend while DB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.