Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NWG vs LYG vs HSBC vs BCS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
NWG vs LYG vs HSBC vs BCS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $30.60B | $77.17B | $305.76B | $79.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29.48B | $65.00B | $147.86B | $26.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.83B | $4.66B | $22.29B | $7.05B |
| Gross Margin | 56.3% | 29.9% | 54.6% | 108.6% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 10.2% | 20.3% | 37.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 12.6x | 10.7x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $71.83B | $95.14B | $495.79B | $219.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85.35B | $56.66B | $286.92B | $229.75B |
NWG vs LYG vs HSBC vs BCS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NatWest Group plc (NWG) | 100 | 514.0 | +414.0% |
| Lloyds Banking Grou… (LYG) | 100 | 374.1 | +274.1% |
| HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) | 100 | 386.0 | +286.0% |
| Barclays PLC (BCS) | 100 | 411.5 | +311.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWG vs LYG vs HSBC vs BCS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 10.3%
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth 27.4%
- NIM 1.8% vs BCS's 0.9%
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 10.9x)
LYG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, current ratio 0.12x
- 72.8% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 1.05 vs BCS's 1.39, lower leverage
HSBC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 264.7% 10Y total return vs NWG's 192.4%
- PEG 0.24 vs LYG's 0.31
- Beta 1.12, yield 3.7%, current ratio 2.62x
- +64.7% vs NWG's +27.0%
BCS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 72.8% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs BCS's 1.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BCS's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.7% vs NWG's +27.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% |
NWG vs LYG vs HSBC vs BCS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NWG leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCS leads 1 • HSBC leads 1 • LYG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.9B annually — 5.5x BCS's $26.8B. BCS is the more profitable business, keeping 26.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYG's 7.2%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29.5B | $65.0B | $147.9B | $26.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.9B | $6.7B | $35.8B | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.8B | $4.7B | $22.3B | $7.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.3% | +29.9% | +54.6% | +108.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +10.2% | +20.3% | +37.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +7.2% | +15.1% | +26.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | -1.0% | +17.0% | -30.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | +141.8% | +23.5% | +36.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NWG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.2x trailing earnings, NWG trades at a 72% valuation discount to HSBC's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCS offers better value at 0.28x vs LYG's 0.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.6B | $77.2B | $305.8B | $79.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.2B | $129.5B | $514.6B | $66.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.19x | 14.37x | 14.71x | 10.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.57x | 12.65x | 10.75x | 10.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.35x | 0.33x | 0.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.01x | 14.30x | 16.11x | 4.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 0.87x | 2.07x | 2.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 1.21x | 1.69x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.89x | — | 12.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NWG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWG delivers a 13.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $9 for BCS. NWG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCS's 2.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWG scores 7/9 vs BCS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | +9.9% | +11.4% | +9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +0.5% | +0.7% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +3.6% | +4.0% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +1.6% | +1.4% | +1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 1.99x | 2.68x | 2.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13.5B | $38.5B | $208.9B | -$9.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85.3B | $56.7B | $286.9B | $229.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $71.8B | $95.1B | $495.8B | $219.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.60x | 0.39x | 0.47x | 0.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSBC five years ago would be worth $32,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,158 for LYG. Over the past 12 months, HSBC leads with a +64.7% total return vs NWG's +27.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCS at 46.5% vs LYG's 35.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.3% | +0.4% | +13.4% | -9.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.0% | +41.1% | +64.7% | +49.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.1% | +150.1% | +162.1% | +214.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.0% | +131.6% | +225.7% | +146.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.4% | +77.6% | +264.7% | +187.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.7% | +35.7% | +37.9% | +46.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYG and HSBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYG is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCS's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSBC currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs NWG's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.05x | 1.12x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.36 | $6.34 | $94.80 | $27.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.76 | $3.81 | $56.21 | $15.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +83.2% | +93.9% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 53.4 | 57.3 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 20.8M | 2.0M | 8.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWG and BCS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NWG as "Buy", LYG as "Buy", HSBC as "Hold", BCS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.9% upside for BCS (target: $44) vs -47.9% for LYG (target: $3). For income investors, NWG offers the higher dividend yield at 10.35% vs LYG's 3.37%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.75 | $52.00 | $44.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 24 | 19 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.3% | +3.4% | +3.7% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.17 | $0.13 | $3.30 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.4% | +2.9% | +4.1% | +10.4% |
NWG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BCS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
NWG vs LYG vs HSBC vs BCS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWG or LYG or HSBC or BCS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is the stronger pick with 72.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). NatWest Group plc (NWG) offers the better valuation at 4. 2x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NatWest Group plc (NWG) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWG or LYG or HSBC or BCS?
On trailing P/E, NatWest Group plc (NWG) is the cheapest at 4.
2x versus HSBC Holdings plc at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, NatWest Group plc is actually cheaper at 10. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HSBC Holdings plc wins at 0. 24x versus Lloyds Banking Group plc's 0. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWG or LYG or HSBC or BCS?
Over the past 5 years, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) delivered a total return of +225.
7%, compared to +131. 6% for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSBC returned +264. 7% versus LYG's +77. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWG or LYG or HSBC or BCS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
05β versus Barclays PLC's 1. 39β — meaning BCS is approximately 32% more volatile than LYG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NatWest Group plc (NWG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 169% versus 3% for Barclays PLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWG or LYG or HSBC or BCS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is pulling ahead at 72.
8% versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NatWest Group plc grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for HSBC Holdings plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWG or LYG or HSBC or BCS?
Barclays PLC (BCS) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
7% net margin versus 7. 2% for Lloyds Banking Group plc — meaning it keeps 26. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCS leads at 37. 3% versus 10. 2% for LYG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCS leads at 108. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWG or LYG or HSBC or BCS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Lloyds Banking Group plc's 0. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NatWest Group plc (NWG) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Lloyds Banking Group plc — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCS: 88. 9% to $44. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWG or LYG or HSBC or BCS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NatWest Group plc (NWG) offers the highest yield at 10. 3%, versus 3. 4% for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG).
09Is NWG or LYG or HSBC or BCS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 3. 7% yield, +264. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSBC: +264. 7%, BCS: +187. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWG and LYG and HSBC and BCS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NWG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LYG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HSBC is a large-cap deep-value stock; BCS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.