Consumer Electronics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Renewable Utilities
Software - Infrastructure
NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Solar | Solar | Renewable Utilities | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $18.72B | $1.24B | $1.40B | $1.77B | $91M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.60B | $1.21B | $536M | $2.58B | $153M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $592M | $-67M | $34M | $-42M | $144M |
| Gross Margin | 32.4% | 22.4% | 33.5% | 11.7% | 36.3% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 4.5% | 11.2% | -1.8% | -35.1% |
| Forward P/E | 28.9x | 11.6x | 20.6x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $766M | $175M | $391M | $369M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $766M | $244M | $7M | $691M | $49M |
NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nextpower Inc. (NXT) | 100 | 414.2 | +314.2% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 33.9 | -66.1% |
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | 100 | 72.6 | -27.4% |
| Stem, Inc. (STEM) | 100 | 6.6 | -93.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 306.6% 10Y total return vs FLNC's -61.3%
- Beta 1.88, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 1.88 vs STEM's 3.66
ARRY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1%
- Better valuation composite
SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
- Lower volatility, beta 2.08, Low D/E 29.2%, current ratio 2.03x
FLNC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +223.6% vs STEM's +6.8%
STEM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 94.2% margin vs ARRY's -5.6%
- 43.2% ROA vs ARRY's -4.4%, ROIC -57.1% vs 9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.2% margin vs ARRY's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.88 vs STEM's 3.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +223.6% vs STEM's +6.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 43.2% ROA vs ARRY's -4.4%, ROIC -57.1% vs 9.0% |
NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NXT leads in 3 of 6 categories
SHLS leads 1 • ARRY leads 0 • FLNC leads 0 • STEM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NXT and STEM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 23.6x STEM's $153M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARRY's -5.6%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $1.2B | $536M | $2.6B | $153M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $766M | $95M | $71M | -$19M | -$16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $592M | -$67M | $34M | -$42M | $144M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $589M | $58M | -$77M | -$269M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +22.4% | +33.5% | +11.7% | +36.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +4.5% | +11.2% | -1.8% | -35.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | -5.6% | +6.3% | -1.6% | +94.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +4.8% | -14.5% | -10.4% | -5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.9% | -26.1% | +74.9% | +7.7% | -10.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | -7.0% | — | +33.3% | +27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ARRY and STEM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.3x trailing earnings, NXT trades at a 13% valuation discount to SHLS's 41.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARRY's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXT's 27.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18.7B | $1.2B | $1.4B | $1.8B | $91M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.0B | $1.8B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $411M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.33x | -11.13x | 41.65x | -36.65x | -1.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.85x | 11.64x | 20.61x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 14.65x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.51x | 13.41x | 24.09x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.32x | 0.97x | 2.94x | 0.78x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.56x | 4.76x | 2.34x | 3.22x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.10x | 15.58x | — | — | 13.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NXT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NXT delivers a 27.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-21 for ARRY. SHLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NXT scores 6/9 vs FLNC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.5% | -20.6% | +5.7% | -8.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.6% | -4.4% | +3.7% | -1.8% | +43.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +62.8% | +9.0% | +5.9% | -15.9% | -57.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +33.8% | +8.2% | +7.6% | -5.7% | -23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.94x | 0.29x | 0.71x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$766M | $522M | $168M | -$300M | $320M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $766M | $244M | $7M | $691M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $766M | $175M | $391M | $369M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 161.08x | -2.42x | 11.65x | — | 14.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NXT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NXT five years ago would be worth $40,658 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $257 for STEM. Over the past 12 months, FLNC leads with a +223.6% total return vs STEM's +6.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NXT at 57.6% vs STEM's -49.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.9% | -16.1% | -8.4% | -41.1% | -37.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +194.0% | +57.7% | +88.9% | +223.6% | +6.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +291.2% | -56.5% | -57.8% | -28.0% | -87.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +306.6% | -68.0% | -71.6% | -61.3% | -97.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +306.6% | -77.7% | -73.1% | -61.3% | -94.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.6% | -24.2% | -25.0% | -10.4% | -49.5% |
Risk & Volatility
NXT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NXT is the less volatile stock with a 1.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NXT currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs STEM's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 2.32x | 2.08x | 3.55x | 3.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $131.72 | $12.23 | $11.36 | $33.51 | $32.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.25 | $4.92 | $3.81 | $3.93 | $5.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +66.4% | +73.3% | +40.5% | +33.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 57.4 | 61.0 | 42.3 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 6.0M | 5.3M | 4.2M | 147K |
Analyst Outlook
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXT as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy", FLNC as "Hold", STEM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 93.4% upside for STEM (target: $21) vs -1.6% for NXT (target: $124).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $124.00 | $9.17 | $9.83 | $19.15 | $20.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 28 | 23 | 27 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
NXT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SHLS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Nextpower Inc. (NXT) offers the better valuation at 36. 3x trailing P/E (28. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nextpower Inc. (NXT) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?
On trailing P/E, Nextpower Inc.
(NXT) is the cheapest at 36. 3x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 41. 6x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?
Over the past 5 years, Nextpower Inc.
(NXT) delivered a total return of +306. 6%, compared to -97. 4% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXT returned +306. 6% versus STEM's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nextpower Inc.
(NXT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 88β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning STEM is approximately 95% more volatile than NXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to -408. 3% for Fluence Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NXT leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?
Stem, Inc.
(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -4. 1% for Array Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXT leads at 21. 6% versus -38. 7% for STEM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STEM leads at 35. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 28. 9x for Nextpower Inc. — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STEM: 93. 4% to $20. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nextpower Inc.
(NXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+306. 6% 10Y return). Stem, Inc. (STEM) carries a higher beta of 3. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXT: +306. 6%, STEM: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NXT and ARRY and SHLS and FLNC and STEM?
These companies operate in different sectors (NXT (Technology) and ARRY (Energy) and SHLS (Energy) and FLNC (Utilities) and STEM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.