Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NXT
Nextpower Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$18.72B
5Y Perf.+314.2%
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.-56.7%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.40B
5Y Perf.-66.1%
FLNC
Fluence Energy, Inc.

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.77B
5Y Perf.-27.4%
STEM
Stem, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$91M
5Y Perf.-93.4%

NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NXT logoNXT
ARRY logoARRY
SHLS logoSHLS
FLNC logoFLNC
STEM logoSTEM
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsSolarSolarRenewable UtilitiesSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$18.72B$1.24B$1.40B$1.77B$91M
Revenue (TTM)$3.60B$1.21B$536M$2.58B$153M
Net Income (TTM)$592M$-67M$34M$-42M$144M
Gross Margin32.4%22.4%33.5%11.7%36.3%
Operating Margin20.5%4.5%11.2%-1.8%-35.1%
Forward P/E28.9x11.6x20.6x
Total Debt$0.00$766M$175M$391M$369M
Cash & Equiv.$766M$244M$7M$691M$49M

NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NXT
ARRY
SHLS
FLNC
STEM
StockFeb 23May 26Return
Nextpower Inc. (NXT)100414.2+314.2%
Array Technologies,… (ARRY)10043.3-56.7%
Shoals Technologies… (SHLS)10033.9-66.1%
Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC)10072.6-27.4%
Stem, Inc. (STEM)1006.6-93.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ARRY and STEM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Stem, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. NXT and FLNC also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NXT
Nextpower Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NXT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 306.6% 10Y total return vs FLNC's -61.3%
  • Beta 1.88, current ratio 2.09x
  • Beta 1.88 vs STEM's 3.66
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARRY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
  • 40.2% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.08, Low D/E 29.2%, current ratio 2.03x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FLNC
Fluence Energy, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

FLNC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +223.6% vs STEM's +6.8%
Best for: momentum
STEM
Stem, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

STEM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 94.2% margin vs ARRY's -5.6%
  • 43.2% ROA vs ARRY's -4.4%, ROIC -57.1% vs 9.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARRY logoARRY40.2% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1%
ValueARRY logoARRYBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSTEM logoSTEM94.2% margin vs ARRY's -5.6%
Stability / SafetyNXT logoNXTBeta 1.88 vs STEM's 3.66
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FLNC logoFLNC+223.6% vs STEM's +6.8%
Efficiency (ROA)STEM logoSTEM43.2% ROA vs ARRY's -4.4%, ROIC -57.1% vs 9.0%

NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NXTNextpower Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$3.0B
ARRYArray Technologies, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
FY 2025
System Solutions
78.7%$374M
Components
21.3%$101M
FLNCFluence Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
96.3%$2.2B
Service
3.7%$84M
STEMStem, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
56.1%$88M
Hardware
43.9%$69M

NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNXTLAGGINGSTEM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NXT and STEM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

NXT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 23.6x STEM's $153M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARRY's -5.6%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNXT logoNXTNextpower Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.6B$1.2B$536M$2.6B$153M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$766M$95M$71M-$19M-$16M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$592M-$67M$34M-$42M$144M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$589M$58M-$77M-$269M-$8M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.4%+22.4%+33.5%+11.7%+36.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.5%+4.5%+11.2%-1.8%-35.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.4%-5.6%+6.3%-1.6%+94.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.4%+4.8%-14.5%-10.4%-5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.9%-26.1%+74.9%+7.7%-10.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.6%-7.0%+33.3%+27.2%
Evenly matched — NXT and STEM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ARRY and STEM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 36.3x trailing earnings, NXT trades at a 13% valuation discount to SHLS's 41.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARRY's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXT's 27.5x.

MetricNXT logoNXTNextpower Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$18.7B$1.2B$1.4B$1.8B$91M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$18.0B$1.8B$1.6B$1.5B$411M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS36.33x-11.13x41.65x-36.65x-1.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.28.85x11.64x20.61x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate14.65x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.51x13.41x24.09x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.32x0.97x2.94x0.78x0.58x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.56x4.76x2.34x3.22x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF30.10x15.58x13.27x
Evenly matched — ARRY and STEM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NXT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

NXT delivers a 27.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-21 for ARRY. SHLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NXT scores 6/9 vs FLNC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNXT logoNXTNextpower Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+27.5%-20.6%+5.7%-8.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.6%-4.4%+3.7%-1.8%+43.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+62.8%+9.0%+5.9%-15.9%-57.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+33.8%+8.2%+7.6%-5.7%-23.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965536
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.94x0.29x0.71x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$766M$522M$168M-$300M$320M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$766M$244M$7M$691M$49M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$766M$175M$391M$369M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense161.08x-2.42x11.65x14.43x
NXT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NXT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NXT five years ago would be worth $40,658 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $257 for STEM. Over the past 12 months, FLNC leads with a +223.6% total return vs STEM's +6.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NXT at 57.6% vs STEM's -49.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNXT logoNXTNextpower Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+35.9%-16.1%-8.4%-41.1%-37.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+194.0%+57.7%+88.9%+223.6%+6.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+291.2%-56.5%-57.8%-28.0%-87.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+306.6%-68.0%-71.6%-61.3%-97.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+306.6%-77.7%-73.1%-61.3%-94.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+57.6%-24.2%-25.0%-10.4%-49.5%
NXT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NXT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NXT is the less volatile stock with a 1.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NXT currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs STEM's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNXT logoNXTNextpower Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.88x2.32x2.08x3.55x3.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$131.72$12.23$11.36$33.51$32.23
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$41.25$4.92$3.81$3.93$5.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.7%+66.4%+73.3%+40.5%+33.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.357.461.042.350.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M6.0M5.3M4.2M147K
NXT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NXT as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy", FLNC as "Hold", STEM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 93.4% upside for STEM (target: $21) vs -1.6% for NXT (target: $124).

MetricNXT logoNXTNextpower Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$124.00$9.17$9.83$19.15$20.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts2828232717
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises113
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%+0.0%0.0%
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NXT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SHLS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallNextpower Inc. (NXT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NXT vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FLNC vs STEM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Nextpower Inc. (NXT) offers the better valuation at 36. 3x trailing P/E (28. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nextpower Inc. (NXT) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?

On trailing P/E, Nextpower Inc.

(NXT) is the cheapest at 36. 3x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 41. 6x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?

Over the past 5 years, Nextpower Inc.

(NXT) delivered a total return of +306. 6%, compared to -97. 4% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXT returned +306. 6% versus STEM's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nextpower Inc.

(NXT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 88β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning STEM is approximately 95% more volatile than NXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to -408. 3% for Fluence Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NXT leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?

Stem, Inc.

(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -4. 1% for Array Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXT leads at 21. 6% versus -38. 7% for STEM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STEM leads at 35. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 28. 9x for Nextpower Inc. — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STEM: 93. 4% to $20. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is NXT or ARRY or SHLS or FLNC or STEM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nextpower Inc.

(NXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+306. 6% 10Y return). Stem, Inc. (STEM) carries a higher beta of 3. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXT: +306. 6%, STEM: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NXT and ARRY and SHLS and FLNC and STEM?

These companies operate in different sectors (NXT (Technology) and ARRY (Energy) and SHLS (Energy) and FLNC (Utilities) and STEM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NXT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARRY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHLS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLNC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STEM

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 56%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NXT and ARRY and SHLS and FLNC and STEM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NXT: 33.9% · ARRY: -26.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.