Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OBLG vs ZCMD vs LPSN vs CNET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Software - Application
Advertising Agencies
OBLG vs ZCMD vs LPSN vs CNET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Software - Application | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $1M | $7M | $32M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $27M | $244M | $6M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-7M | $-67M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 51.0% | 62.2% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | -130.5% | -24.0% | -9.6% | -31.7% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $26K | $392M | $122K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $8M | $95M | $812K |
OBLG vs ZCMD vs LPSN vs CNET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oblong, Inc. (OBLG) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 6.6 | -93.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OBLG vs ZCMD vs LPSN vs CNET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OBLG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ZCMD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 11.11x
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 11.11x
- -25.5% margin vs OBLG's -187.2%
LPSN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -22.0%, EPS growth 45.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -22.1%
- -22.0% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
- -12.4% ROA vs OBLG's -40.9%
CNET is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.18
- -97.8% 10Y total return vs LPSN's -97.0%
- Beta 1.18 vs OBLG's 3.31
- -55.1% vs ZCMD's -77.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -22.0% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -25.5% margin vs OBLG's -187.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs OBLG's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -55.1% vs ZCMD's -77.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -12.4% ROA vs OBLG's -40.9% |
OBLG vs ZCMD vs LPSN vs CNET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OBLG vs ZCMD vs LPSN vs CNET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CNET leads in 2 of 6 categories
LPSN leads 1 • OBLG leads 0 • ZCMD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ZCMD and LPSN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LPSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $244M annually — 102.5x OBLG's $2M. ZCMD is the more profitable business, keeping -25.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OBLG's -187.2%. On growth, OBLG holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $27M | $244M | $6M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$6M | -$562,000 | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$7M | -$67M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$4M | -$43M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.0% | +51.0% | +62.2% | +4.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -130.5% | -24.0% | -9.6% | -31.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -187.2% | -25.5% | -27.6% | -33.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -129.4% | -14.0% | -17.4% | -27.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | -23.2% | -19.0% | -47.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.4% | -20.3% | +79.4% | +95.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OBLG and ZCMD and CNET each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $7M | $32M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | -$1M | $329M | $1M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.07x | -1.15x | -0.22x | -0.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 0.60x | 0.13x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 0.32x | — | 0.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.90x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LPSN leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZCMD delivers a -30.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-30 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. ZCMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNET's 0.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LPSN scores 5/9 vs OBLG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.3% | -30.5% | — | -60.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.9% | -27.7% | -12.4% | -21.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -30.1% | -6.6% | -64.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -88.2% | -26.3% | -5.8% | -73.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$8M | $297M | -$690,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $8M | $95M | $812,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $26,083 | $392M | $122,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNET five years ago would be worth $206 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for OBLG. Over the past 12 months, CNET leads with a -55.1% total return vs ZCMD's -77.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNET at -52.1% vs OBLG's -74.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.2% | -44.8% | -31.1% | -44.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.5% | -77.5% | -77.1% | -55.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -97.5% | -95.8% | -89.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -98.5% | -99.7% | -97.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.3% | -97.0% | -97.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.6% | -70.9% | -65.4% | -52.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CNET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNET is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OBLG's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNET currently trades 25.2% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.31x | 1.21x | 2.05x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.50 | $12.18 | $21.60 | $2.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.96 | $0.43 | $2.37 | $0.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.0% | +17.5% | +12.4% | +25.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.1 | 60.4 | 40.3 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 95K | 15K | 148K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CNET leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). LPSN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
OBLG vs ZCMD vs LPSN vs CNET: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OBLG or ZCMD or LPSN or CNET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LivePerson, Inc.
(LPSN) is the stronger pick with -22. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OBLG or ZCMD or LPSN or CNET?
Over the past 5 years, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) delivered a total return of -97. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Oblong, Inc. (OBLG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LPSN returned -97. 0% versus OBLG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OBLG or ZCMD or LPSN or CNET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Oblong, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning OBLG is approximately 182% more volatile than CNET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OBLG or ZCMD or LPSN or CNET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LivePerson, Inc.
(LPSN) is pulling ahead at -22. 0% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oblong, Inc. grew EPS 49. 9% year-over-year, compared to -124. 1% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZCMD leads at -7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OBLG or ZCMD or LPSN or CNET?
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is the more profitable company, earning -24. 4% net margin versus -170. 0% for Oblong, Inc. — meaning it keeps -24. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LPSN leads at -9. 6% versus -176. 7% for OBLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LPSN leads at 62. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OBLG or ZCMD or LPSN or CNET?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is OBLG or ZCMD or LPSN or CNET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18)). Oblong, Inc. (OBLG) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNET: -97. 8%, OBLG: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OBLG and ZCMD and LPSN and CNET?
These companies operate in different sectors (OBLG (Technology) and ZCMD (Healthcare) and LPSN (Technology) and CNET (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.