Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OFIX vs NVCR vs ATEC vs XTNT vs NVAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Biotechnology
OFIX vs NVCR vs ATEC vs XTNT vs NVAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $488M | $1.92B | $1.17B | $80M | $1.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $825M | $674M | $595M | $133M | $596M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-60M | $-173M | $-125M | $2M | $-88M |
| Gross Margin | 69.0% | 75.2% | 89.6% | 62.0% | 84.6% |
| Operating Margin | -4.0% | -27.2% | -9.6% | 4.8% | -11.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 27.1x | — | 3.6x |
| Total Debt | $229M | $290M | $620M | $35M | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $82M | $103M | $161M | $6M | $241M |
OFIX vs NVCR vs ATEC vs XTNT vs NVAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orthofix Medical In… (OFIX) | 100 | 35.4 | -64.6% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Alphatec Holdings, … (ATEC) | 100 | 174.2 | +74.2% |
| Xtant Medical Holdi… (XTNT) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 20.0 | -80.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OFIX vs NVCR vs ATEC vs XTNT vs NVAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OFIX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ATEC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 225.4% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 30.3%
XTNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.69
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 81.8%, current ratio 2.35x
- Beta 0.69, current ratio 2.35x
- 1.3% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
NVAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- 64.7% revenue growth vs OFIX's 2.9%
- Better valuation composite
- +55.1% vs ATEC's -37.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.7% revenue growth vs OFIX's 2.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.1% vs ATEC's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC -12.8% vs -16.4% |
OFIX vs NVCR vs ATEC vs XTNT vs NVAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OFIX vs NVCR vs ATEC vs XTNT vs NVAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XTNT leads in 2 of 6 categories
OFIX leads 1 • NVAX leads 1 • NVCR leads 0 • ATEC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XTNT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OFIX is the larger business by revenue, generating $825M annually — 6.2x XTNT's $133M. XTNT is the more profitable business, keeping 1.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, XTNT holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $825M | $674M | $595M | $133M | $596M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $102M | -$165M | $4M | $11M | -$47M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$60M | -$173M | -$125M | $2M | -$88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$48M | $7M | $5M | -$96M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.0% | +75.2% | +89.6% | +62.0% | +84.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -27.2% | -9.6% | +4.8% | -11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.3% | -25.7% | -21.1% | +1.3% | -14.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | -7.1% | +1.2% | +3.9% | -16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +12.3% | -100.0% | +19.0% | -79.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.5% | -100.0% | +37.1% | +123.7% | -102.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OFIX leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATEC's 3752.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $488M | $1.9B | $1.2B | $80M | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $635M | $2.1B | $1.6B | $109M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.29x | -13.80x | -8.07x | -4.75x | 3.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 27.09x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 3752.09x | — | 2.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 2.92x | 1.54x | 0.68x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 5.51x | 32.28x | 1.77x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 422.56x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
XTNT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XTNT delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ATEC. OFIX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATEC's 17.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATEC scores 6/9 vs XTNT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.4% | -50.8% | -4.4% | +3.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.0% | -16.5% | -15.8% | +1.8% | -7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.6% | -16.4% | -12.6% | -12.8% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.7% | -28.9% | -13.7% | -17.9% | +100.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.85x | 17.21x | 0.82x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $147M | $187M | $459M | $29M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $82M | $103M | $161M | $6M | $241M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $229M | $290M | $620M | $35M | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.97x | -96.80x | -3.29x | 1.55x | -5.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATEC five years ago would be worth $5,129 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $524 for NVAX. Over the past 12 months, NVAX leads with a +55.1% total return vs ATEC's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVAX at 7.4% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.7% | +28.3% | -62.7% | -24.0% | +29.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.4% | +1.1% | -37.8% | +10.0% | +55.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.1% | -75.7% | -47.8% | -12.3% | +23.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.7% | -91.3% | -48.7% | -66.1% | -94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.0% | +30.3% | +225.4% | -97.8% | -90.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.4% | -37.6% | -19.5% | -4.3% | +7.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and XTNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XTNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs ATEC's 33.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 2.20x | 1.13x | 0.69x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.99 | $20.06 | $23.29 | $0.95 | $11.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.24 | $9.82 | $6.85 | $0.44 | $5.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.0% | +83.9% | +33.3% | +60.0% | +77.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 69.8 | 26.8 | 60.9 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 274K | 1.5M | 3.0M | 142K | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OFIX as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", ATEC as "Buy", NVAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 222.6% upside for ATEC (target: $25) vs 49.1% for OFIX (target: $18).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $33.50 | $25.00 | — | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 15 | 16 | — | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
XTNT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OFIX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
OFIX vs NVCR vs ATEC vs XTNT vs NVAX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OFIX or NVCR or ATEC or XTNT or NVAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the stronger pick with 64. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for Orthofix Medical Inc. (OFIX). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NovoCure Limited (NVCR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OFIX or NVCR or ATEC or XTNT or NVAX?
Over the past 5 years, Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
(ATEC) delivered a total return of -48. 7%, compared to -94. 8% for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATEC returned +225. 4% versus XTNT's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OFIX or NVCR or ATEC or XTNT or NVAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 220% more volatile than XTNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Orthofix Medical Inc. (OFIX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 17% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OFIX or NVCR or ATEC or XTNT or NVAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is pulling ahead at 64. 7% versus 2. 9% for Orthofix Medical Inc. (OFIX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to 15. 0% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATEC leads at 29. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OFIX or NVCR or ATEC or XTNT or NVAX?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OFIX or NVCR or ATEC or XTNT or NVAX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATEC: 222.
6% to $25. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — OFIX or NVCR or ATEC or XTNT or NVAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is OFIX or NVCR or ATEC or XTNT or NVAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69)). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XTNT: -97. 8%, NVAX: -90. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OFIX and NVCR and ATEC and XTNT and NVAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OFIX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATEC is a small-cap high-growth stock; XTNT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.