Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OFS vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC vs GBDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
OFS vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC vs GBDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $52M | $657M | $3.07B | $13.61B | $3.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-12M | $90M | $547M | $3.15B | $871M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $130M | $289M | $1.15B | $205M |
| Gross Margin | 239.8% | 68.6% | 87.2% | 75.7% | 81.5% |
| Operating Margin | 280.2% | 72.7% | 66.7% | 69.7% | 78.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.7x | 8.4x | 9.9x | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $218M | $456M | $2.30B | $15.99B | $4.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $14M | $57M | $924M | $24M |
OFS vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC vs GBDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OFS Capital Corpora… (OFS) | 100 | 78.2 | -21.8% |
| Gladstone Investmen… (GAIN) | 100 | 148.9 | +48.9% |
| Hercules Capital, I… (HTGC) | 100 | 147.2 | +47.2% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 128.5 | +28.5% |
| Golub Capital BDC, … (GBDC) | 100 | 108.3 | +8.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OFS vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC vs GBDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OFS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 30.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GAIN's 10.0%
GAIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 10.0%
- 319.3% 10Y total return vs HTGC's 171.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 91.3%, current ratio 3.69x
- Beta 0.53 vs OFS's 0.90, lower leverage
HTGC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 9.1% vs ARCC's 3.6%
Among these 5 stocks, ARCC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GBDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 42.5%, EPS growth 4.4%
- PEG 0.30 vs ARCC's 0.96
- Beta 0.64, yield 10.5%, current ratio 5.35x
- 42.5% NII/revenue growth vs OFS's -124.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.5% NII/revenue growth vs OFS's -124.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs HTGC's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs OFS's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 30.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GAIN's 10.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.8% vs OFS's -42.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs HTGC's 0.2% |
OFS vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC vs GBDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OFS leads in 2 of 6 categories
GAIN leads 2 • HTGC leads 1 • ARCC leads 0 • GBDC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC and OFS operate at a comparable scale, with $3.1B and -$12M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.8% (OFS) to 41.3% (ARCC).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$12M | $90M | $547M | $3.1B | $871M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | $58M | $381M | $2.0B | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | $130M | $289M | $1.1B | $205M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $35M | -$82M | -$352M | $1.1B | $313M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +68.6% | +87.2% | +75.7% | +81.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +72.7% | +66.7% | +69.7% | +78.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +72.7% | +62.1% | +41.3% | +43.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +126.8% | -77.8% | +36.3% | -13.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -142.6% | +58.1% | -20.7% | -63.9% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OFS and GBDC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.9x trailing earnings, HTGC trades at a 13% valuation discount to ARCC's 10.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBDC offers better value at 0.30x vs ARCC's 0.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $52M | $657M | $3.1B | $13.6B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $267M | $1.1B | $5.3B | $28.7B | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.58x | 9.28x | 8.86x | 10.19x | 9.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.66x | 8.41x | 9.92x | 9.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.99x | 0.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.82x | 14.54x | 13.09x | 12.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.31x | 5.61x | 4.33x | 3.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.42x | 1.22x | 1.44x | 0.93x | 0.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.20x | 5.77x | — | 11.92x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HTGC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GAIN delivers a 21.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-23 for OFS. GAIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OFS's 1.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HTGC scores 5/9 vs GBDC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.4% | +21.9% | +13.2% | +8.1% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.6% | +10.5% | +6.4% | +3.8% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.5% | +5.3% | +6.6% | +5.7% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.7% | +6.8% | +8.8% | +7.5% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.77x | 0.91x | 1.04x | 1.12x | 1.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $214M | $441M | $2.2B | $15.1B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $14M | $57M | $924M | $24M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $218M | $456M | $2.3B | $16.0B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.00x | 1.58x | 4.34x | 2.98x | 1.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GAIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GAIN five years ago would be worth $17,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,491 for OFS. Over the past 12 months, GAIN leads with a +30.8% total return vs OFS's -42.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTGC at 17.9% vs OFS's -7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | +20.7% | -10.6% | -4.9% | -0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.1% | +30.8% | +6.6% | +0.4% | +3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.8% | +56.5% | +63.9% | +34.2% | +35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.9% | +72.0% | +46.8% | +47.0% | +33.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.8% | +319.3% | +171.6% | +139.2% | +61.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.5% | +16.1% | +17.9% | +10.3% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
GAIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GAIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OFS's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GAIN currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs OFS's 41.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.53x | 0.69x | 0.77x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.31 | $17.14 | $19.67 | $23.42 | $15.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.72 | $13.11 | $13.70 | $17.40 | $11.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.9% | +96.3% | +83.4% | +81.0% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 69.9 | 64.7 | 56.7 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 100K | 371K | 2.5M | 7.5M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
OFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GAIN as "Hold", HTGC as "Buy", ARCC as "Buy", GBDC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for ARCC (target: $22) vs -9.1% for GAIN (target: $15). For income investors, OFS offers the higher dividend yield at 30.51% vs ARCC's 2.02%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $18.92 | $21.88 | $14.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 31 | 32 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +30.5% | +10.0% | +8.6% | +2.0% | +10.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | $1.66 | $1.42 | $0.38 | $1.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +2.3% |
OFS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). GAIN leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
OFS vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC vs GBDC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OFS or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC or GBDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
(GBDC) is the stronger pick with 42. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -124. 6% for OFS Capital Corporation (OFS). Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OFS or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC or GBDC?
On trailing P/E, Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the cheapest at 8. 9x versus Ares Capital Corporation at 10. 2x. On forward P/E, Hercules Capital, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. wins at 0. 30x versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 96x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OFS or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC or GBDC?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) delivered a total return of +72.
0%, compared to +4. 9% for OFS Capital Corporation (OFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAIN returned +319. 3% versus OFS's +23. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OFS or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC or GBDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus OFS Capital Corporation's 0. 90β — meaning OFS is approximately 68% more volatile than GAIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 177% for OFS Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OFS or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC or GBDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
(GBDC) is pulling ahead at 42. 5% versus -124. 6% for OFS Capital Corporation (OFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hercules Capital, Inc. grew EPS 14. 9% year-over-year, compared to -216. 5% for OFS Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OFS or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC or GBDC?
OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) is the more profitable company, earning 280.
2% net margin versus 41. 3% for Ares Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 280. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OFS leads at 280. 2% versus 66. 7% for HTGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OFS leads at 239. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OFS or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC or GBDC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 96x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 40. 7x for Gladstone Investment Corporation — 32. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARCC: 15. 4% to $21. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — OFS or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC or GBDC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
OFS Capital Corporation (OFS) offers the highest yield at 30. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
09Is OFS or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC or GBDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 10. 0% yield, +319. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAIN: +319. 3%, OFS: +23. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OFS and GAIN and HTGC and ARCC and GBDC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OFS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GAIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; HTGC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.