Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OGS vs RGCO vs SR vs NJR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
OGS vs RGCO vs SR vs NJR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $5.35B | $246M | $5.05B | $5.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.32B | $107M | $2.47B | $2.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $273M | $14M | $358M | $341M |
| Gross Margin | 68.0% | 27.6% | 73.3% | 27.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 17.3% | 22.1% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 17.5x | 17.7x | 16.6x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $3.39B | $149M | $5.24B | $3.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $2M | $6M | $10M |
OGS vs RGCO vs SR vs NJR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS) | 100 | 101.1 | +1.1% |
| RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) | 100 | 87.9 | -12.1% |
| Spire Inc. (SR) | 100 | 117.5 | +17.5% |
| New Jersey Resource… (NJR) | 100 | 158.2 | +58.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OGS vs RGCO vs SR vs NJR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OGS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 12.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.0%
- 16.5% revenue growth vs SR's -4.5%
RGCO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, current ratio 1.03x
SR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.6%
- PEG 0.67 vs OGS's 5.01
- Beta 0.06, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.32x
- Lower P/E (16.6x vs 17.7x)
NJR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 90.4% 10Y total return vs RGCO's 108.5%
- 15.4% margin vs OGS's 11.8%
- +17.6% vs OGS's +8.1%
- 6.0% ROA vs SR's 2.9%, ROIC 5.5% vs 4.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.5% revenue growth vs SR's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.6x vs 17.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.4% margin vs OGS's 11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs RGCO's 0.65 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs NJR's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.6% vs OGS's +8.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs SR's 2.9%, ROIC 5.5% vs 4.7% |
OGS vs RGCO vs SR vs NJR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OGS vs RGCO vs SR vs NJR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SR leads in 2 of 6 categories
NJR leads 1 • OGS leads 0 • RGCO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RGCO and SR and NJR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 23.1x RGCO's $107M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.4% (NJR) to 11.8% (OGS). On growth, RGCO holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $107M | $2.5B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $779M | $30M | $864M | $727M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $273M | $14M | $358M | $341M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$219M | $14M | -$2.7B | -$527M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.0% | +27.6% | +73.3% | +27.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +17.3% | +22.1% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +13.0% | +14.5% | +15.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.4% | +12.6% | -108.1% | -23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.1% | +24.7% | -9.0% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +13.5% | +31.1% | +6.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, NJR trades at a 15% valuation discount to SR's 19.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SR offers better value at 0.79x vs OGS's 5.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $246M | $5.1B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.7B | $392M | $10.3B | $9.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.52x | 18.33x | 19.57x | 16.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.52x | 17.71x | 16.57x | 16.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.58x | — | 0.79x | 1.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.25x | 13.12x | 12.51x | 14.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.21x | 2.58x | 2.04x | 2.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 2.15x | 1.48x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.91x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NJR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NJR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $8 for OGS. OGS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.99x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NJR's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OGS scores 7/9 vs SR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | +11.9% | +10.4% | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +4.2% | +2.9% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +5.4% | +4.7% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +6.2% | +5.8% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 1.31x | 1.54x | 1.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $147M | $5.2B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $2M | $6M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $149M | $5.2B | $3.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.25x | 3.65x | 2.62x | 4.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RGCO and NJR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NJR five years ago would be worth $14,657 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,516 for OGS. Over the past 12 months, NJR leads with a +17.6% total return vs OGS's +8.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RGCO at 11.7% vs OGS's 5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.0% | +12.5% | +3.8% | +21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.1% | +16.3% | +16.6% | +17.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.9% | +39.4% | +38.7% | +21.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.2% | +28.2% | +32.1% | +46.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.9% | +108.5% | +71.4% | +90.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.0% | +11.7% | +11.5% | +6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RGCO and NJR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NJR is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RGCO's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RGCO currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs SR's 89.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.00x | 0.62x | 0.04x | -0.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.78 | $24.50 | $95.31 | $57.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.87 | $19.68 | $69.94 | $43.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +96.5% | +89.7% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.1 | 53.4 | 34.0 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 439K | 11K | 346K | 485K |
Analyst Outlook
SR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OGS as "Hold", RGCO as "Buy", SR as "Buy", NJR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.3% upside for SR (target: $98) vs 0.4% for NJR (target: $56). For income investors, SR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs OGS's 3.11%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.60 | — | $97.75 | $55.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 4 | 15 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +3.5% | +3.6% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 11 | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.66 | $0.82 | $3.10 | $1.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). NJR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
OGS vs RGCO vs SR vs NJR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OGS or RGCO or SR or NJR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ONE Gas, Inc.
(OGS) is the stronger pick with 16. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Spire Inc. (SR). New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RGC Resources, Inc. (RGCO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OGS or RGCO or SR or NJR?
On trailing P/E, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the cheapest at 16.
7x versus Spire Inc. at 19. 6x. On forward P/E, New Jersey Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spire Inc. wins at 0. 67x versus ONE Gas, Inc. 's 5. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OGS or RGCO or SR or NJR?
Over the past 5 years, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) delivered a total return of +46.
6%, compared to +25. 2% for ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RGCO returned +105. 4% versus SR's +71. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OGS or RGCO or SR or NJR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
17β versus RGC Resources, Inc. 's 0. 62β — meaning RGCO is approximately -472% more volatile than NJR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 99% versus 158% for New Jersey Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OGS or RGCO or SR or NJR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ONE Gas, Inc.
(OGS) is pulling ahead at 16. 5% versus -4. 5% for Spire Inc. (SR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: New Jersey Resources Corporation grew EPS 14. 0% year-over-year, compared to 4. 3% for Spire Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RGCO leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OGS or RGCO or SR or NJR?
New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
5% net margin versus 10. 9% for ONE Gas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NJR leads at 21. 4% versus 18. 8% for OGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SR leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OGS or RGCO or SR or NJR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spire Inc. (SR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 67x versus ONE Gas, Inc. 's 5. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 7x for RGC Resources, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SR: 14. 3% to $97. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — OGS or RGCO or SR or NJR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Spire Inc. (SR) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 3. 1% for ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS).
09Is OGS or RGCO or SR or NJR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
17), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NJR: +90. 5%, RGCO: +105. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OGS and RGCO and SR and NJR?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RGCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NJR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.