Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OKTA vs CRWD vs SAIL vs S
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
OKTA vs CRWD vs SAIL vs S — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $14.59B | $128.13B | $6.85B | $5.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.92B | $4.81B | $1.02B | $1.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $235M | $-183M | $-297M | $-451M |
| Gross Margin | 77.4% | 74.9% | 66.0% | 74.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | -5.4% | -16.4% | -32.1% |
| Forward P/E | 21.3x | 103.9x | — | 83.8x |
| Total Debt | $422M | $820M | $1.05B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $858M | $5.23B | $121M | $170M |
OKTA vs CRWD vs SAIL vs S — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okta, Inc. (OKTA) | 100 | 89.4 | -10.6% |
| CrowdStrike Holding… (CRWD) | 100 | 129.8 | +29.8% |
| SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| SentinelOne, Inc. (S) | 100 | 77.2 | -22.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OKTA vs CRWD vs SAIL vs S
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OKTA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.11
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 1.11, current ratio 1.36x
- Lower P/E (21.3x vs 83.8x)
CRWD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs SAIL's -44.6%
- +19.7% vs SAIL's -33.7%
SAIL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.2%, EPS growth 72.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.1%
- 23.2% revenue growth vs OKTA's 11.8%
S lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.2% revenue growth vs OKTA's 11.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.3x vs 83.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs S's -45.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs SAIL's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.7% vs SAIL's -33.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs S's -18.8%, ROIC 1.7% vs -17.4% |
OKTA vs CRWD vs SAIL vs S — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OKTA vs CRWD vs SAIL vs S — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OKTA leads in 3 of 6 categories
CRWD leads 1 • SAIL leads 0 • S leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OKTA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRWD is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 4.8x S's $1.0B. OKTA is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to S's -45.0%. On growth, CRWD holds the edge at +23.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $4.8B | $1.0B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $243M | $22M | $42M | -$283M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $235M | -$183M | -$297M | -$451M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $900M | $1.2B | $6M | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.4% | +74.9% | +66.0% | +74.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | -5.4% | -16.4% | -32.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | -3.8% | -29.2% | -45.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | +25.8% | +0.6% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.6% | +23.3% | +19.8% | +20.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +169.2% | +140.5% | +85.4% | -50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OKTA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OKTA's 56.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRWD's 1031.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.6B | $128.1B | $6.8B | $5.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.2B | $123.7B | $7.8B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 61.74x | -778.06x | -6.16x | -11.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.32x | 103.89x | — | 83.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 56.86x | 1031.68x | 160.20x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.00x | 26.63x | 7.95x | 5.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.07x | 29.19x | — | 3.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.13x | 97.79x | — | 66.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OKTA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OKTA delivers a 3.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-30 for S. OKTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRWD's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OKTA scores 8/9 vs S's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.5% | -4.6% | -8.0% | -29.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -1.9% | -4.0% | -18.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | -193.7% | — | -17.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | -2.7% | -2.7% | -18.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.18x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$436M | -$4.4B | $926M | -$170M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $858M | $5.2B | $121M | $170M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $422M | $820M | $1.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 59.50x | -6.06x | -0.91x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRWD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRWD five years ago would be worth $26,733 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,409 for OKTA. Over the past 12 months, CRWD leads with a +19.7% total return vs SAIL's -33.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRWD at 56.3% vs SAIL's -17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.3% | +11.5% | -35.7% | +8.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.5% | +19.7% | -33.7% | -16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.1% | +281.9% | -44.6% | -8.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.9% | +167.3% | -44.6% | -62.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +244.0% | +772.0% | -44.6% | -62.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.7% | +56.3% | -17.9% | -3.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OKTA and CRWD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OKTA is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAIL's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRWD currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs SAIL's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.35x | 1.81x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $127.57 | $566.90 | $24.95 | $21.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $62.66 | $342.72 | $10.30 | $11.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.4% | +89.2% | +48.9% | +74.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 61.7 | 43.7 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 3.6M | 3.1M | 7.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OKTA as "Buy", CRWD as "Buy", SAIL as "Buy", S as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.4% upside for SAIL (target: $22) vs 4.4% for CRWD (target: $528).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $101.81 | $528.24 | $21.50 | $18.68 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 51 | 65 | 32 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +4.0% |
OKTA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CRWD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
OKTA vs CRWD vs SAIL vs S: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OKTA or CRWD or SAIL or S a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SailPoint, Inc.
(SAIL) is the stronger pick with 23. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 8% for Okta, Inc. (OKTA). Okta, Inc. (OKTA) offers the better valuation at 61. 7x trailing P/E (21. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Okta, Inc. (OKTA) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OKTA or CRWD or SAIL or S?
On forward P/E, Okta, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 21. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OKTA or CRWD or SAIL or S?
Over the past 5 years, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
(CRWD) delivered a total return of +167. 3%, compared to -65. 9% for Okta, Inc. (OKTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRWD returned +772. 0% versus S's -62. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OKTA or CRWD or SAIL or S?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Okta, Inc.
(OKTA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus SailPoint, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning SAIL is approximately 63% more volatile than OKTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Okta, Inc. (OKTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 18% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OKTA or CRWD or SAIL or S?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SailPoint, Inc.
(SAIL) is pulling ahead at 23. 2% versus 11. 8% for Okta, Inc. (OKTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Okta, Inc. grew EPS 20. 8% year-over-year, compared to -725. 9% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, S leads at 33. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OKTA or CRWD or SAIL or S?
Okta, Inc.
(OKTA) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus -45. 0% for SentinelOne, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OKTA leads at 5. 2% versus -32. 1% for S. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OKTA leads at 77. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OKTA or CRWD or SAIL or S more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Okta, Inc.
(OKTA) trades at 21. 3x forward P/E versus 103. 9x for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. — 82. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAIL: 76. 4% to $21. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — OKTA or CRWD or SAIL or S?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OKTA or CRWD or SAIL or S better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
(CRWD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+772. 0% 10Y return). SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRWD: +772. 0%, SAIL: -44. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OKTA and CRWD and SAIL and S?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OKTA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRWD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SAIL is a small-cap high-growth stock; S is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.