Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ONEW vs MBUU vs BC vs MPX vs HZO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ONEW
OneWater Marine Inc.

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$198M
5Y Perf.-19.1%
MBUU
Malibu Boats, Inc.

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$473M
5Y Perf.-46.1%
BC
Brunswick Corporation

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.26B
5Y Perf.+46.8%
MPX
Marine Products Corporation

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$298M
5Y Perf.-24.8%
HZO
MarineMax, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$724M
5Y Perf.+72.7%

ONEW vs MBUU vs BC vs MPX vs HZO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ONEW logoONEW
MBUU logoMBUU
BC logoBC
MPX logoMPX
HZO logoHZO
IndustryAuto - Recreational VehiclesAuto - Recreational VehiclesAuto - Recreational VehiclesAuto - Recreational VehiclesSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$198M$473M$5.26B$298M$724M
Revenue (TTM)$1.88B$826M$5.52B$244M$2.24B
Net Income (TTM)$-110M$-5M$-137M$11M$-64M
Gross Margin22.5%15.4%18.0%19.1%32.7%
Operating Margin3.4%0.1%5.2%5.2%-0.6%
Forward P/E20.8x20.9x19.0x16.9x45.0x
Total Debt$964M$25M$2.43B$0.00$1.25B
Cash & Equiv.$52M$37M$275M$44M$170M

ONEW vs MBUU vs BC vs MPX vs HZOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ONEW
MBUU
BC
MPX
HZO
StockMay 20May 26Return
OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW)10080.9-19.1%
Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU)10053.9-46.1%
Brunswick Corporati… (BC)100146.8+46.8%
Marine Products Cor… (MPX)10075.2-24.8%
MarineMax, Inc. (HZO)100172.7+72.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ONEW vs MBUU vs BC vs MPX vs HZO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MPX leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Brunswick Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. ONEW also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ONEW
OneWater Marine Inc.
The Growth Play

ONEW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 5.6%, EPS growth -17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.4%
  • 5.6% revenue growth vs HZO's -5.0%
Best for: growth exposure
MBUU
Malibu Boats, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MBUU is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.71, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 1.63x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BC
Brunswick Corporation
The Income Pick

BC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 2.1%
  • 96.4% 10Y total return vs HZO's 78.6%
  • 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs MPX's 6.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • +79.7% vs MBUU's -14.7%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MPX
Marine Products Corporation
The Defensive Pick

MPX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.

  • Beta 1.00, yield 6.6%, current ratio 5.37x
  • Lower P/E (16.9x vs 45.0x)
  • 4.6% margin vs ONEW's -5.9%
  • Beta 1.00 vs HZO's 2.09
Best for: defensive
HZO
MarineMax, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, HZO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthONEW logoONEW5.6% revenue growth vs HZO's -5.0%
ValueMPX logoMPXLower P/E (16.9x vs 45.0x)
Quality / MarginsMPX logoMPX4.6% margin vs ONEW's -5.9%
Stability / SafetyMPX logoMPXBeta 1.00 vs HZO's 2.09
DividendsBC logoBC2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs MPX's 6.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BC logoBC+79.7% vs MBUU's -14.7%
Efficiency (ROA)MPX logoMPX6.6% ROA vs ONEW's -7.3%, ROIC 13.3% vs 3.6%

ONEW vs MBUU vs BC vs MPX vs HZO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ONEWOneWater Marine Inc.
FY 2025
New Sales
61.9%$1.2B
Pre-Owned
19.4%$364M
Service, Parts & Other
15.8%$295M
Finance And Insurance Income
2.9%$55M
MBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.
FY 2025
Malibu
38.7%$313M
Pursuit Boats
34.6%$280M
Cobalt
26.7%$215M
BCBrunswick Corporation
FY 2025
Propulsion
35.6%$1.9B
Boat
28.4%$1.5B
Parts and Accessories
22.6%$1.2B
Navico Group
13.4%$721M
MPXMarine Products Corporation
FY 2025
Boats and accessories
97.9%$239M
Parts
2.1%$5M
HZOMarineMax, Inc.
FY 2025
Retail Operations
94.3%$2.3B
Product Manufacturing
5.7%$139M

ONEW vs MBUU vs BC vs MPX vs HZO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMPXLAGGINGHZO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MPX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BC is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 22.6x MPX's $244M. MPX is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ONEW's -5.9%. On growth, MPX holds the edge at +35.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricONEW logoONEWOneWater Marine I…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MPX logoMPXMarine Products C…HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$826M$5.5B$244M$2.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$87M$11M$511M$16M$11M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$110M-$5M-$137M$11M-$64M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$41M$40M$341M$15M$169M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.5%+15.4%+18.0%+19.1%+32.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.4%+0.1%+5.2%+5.2%-0.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.9%-0.6%-2.5%+4.6%-2.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.2%+4.8%+6.2%+6.1%+7.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.3%+3.1%+12.8%+35.0%-16.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.0%-118.2%+6.7%-43.7%-185.7%
MPX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ONEW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 25.6x trailing earnings, MPX trades at a 23% valuation discount to MBUU's 33.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MBUU's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BC's 29.3x.

MetricONEW logoONEWOneWater Marine I…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MPX logoMPXMarine Products C…HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$198M$473M$5.3B$298M$724M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$461M$7.4B$255M$1.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.65x33.42x-38.82x25.64x-22.98x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.77x20.89x18.98x16.92x44.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.26x7.64x29.31x14.83x11.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.11x0.59x0.98x1.22x0.31x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.66x0.96x3.26x2.37x0.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF2.51x16.53x13.27x19.97x60.62x
ONEW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MPX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MPX delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-33 for ONEW. MBUU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ONEW's 3.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MBUU scores 7/9 vs ONEW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricONEW logoONEWOneWater Marine I…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MPX logoMPXMarine Products C…HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-33.0%-1.0%-5.1%+8.9%-6.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.3%-0.7%-2.5%+6.6%-2.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.6%+3.2%-0.8%+13.3%+3.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.1%+3.6%-1.0%+10.1%+6.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937445
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.38x0.05x1.49x1.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$912M-$12M$2.2B-$44M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$52M$37M$275M$44M$170M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$964M$25M$2.4B$0$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.63x1.84x4.34x0.71x
MPX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — BC and HZO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BC five years ago would be worth $7,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,568 for ONEW. Over the past 12 months, BC leads with a +79.7% total return vs MBUU's -14.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HZO at 4.6% vs ONEW's -24.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricONEW logoONEWOneWater Marine I…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MPX logoMPXMarine Products C…HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.9%-11.2%+7.0%-1.9%+36.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-1.3%-14.7%+79.7%+8.3%+56.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.3%-56.4%+3.8%-25.2%+14.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-74.3%-70.0%-23.5%-29.3%-49.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-9.2%+76.9%+96.4%+67.5%+78.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-24.7%-24.2%+1.2%-9.2%+4.6%
Evenly matched — BC and HZO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MPX and HZO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MPX is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HZO's 2.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HZO currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs MBUU's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricONEW logoONEWOneWater Marine I…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MPX logoMPXMarine Products C…HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.98x1.71x1.69x1.00x2.09x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.92$39.65$90.23$10.08$33.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.12$23.84$45.52$6.83$20.52
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+66.6%+64.1%+89.5%+83.9%+99.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.650.057.662.361.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded147K336K886K35K344K
Evenly matched — MPX and HZO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BC and MPX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ONEW as "Buy", MBUU as "Buy", BC as "Buy", MPX as "Hold", HZO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.9% upside for MBUU (target: $33) vs -0.6% for HZO (target: $33). For income investors, MPX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.62% vs ONEW's 0.15%.

MetricONEW logoONEWOneWater Marine I…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MPX logoMPXMarine Products C…HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$32.75$88.78$32.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts91631417
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+2.1%+6.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises011301
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02$1.71$0.56
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+7.6%+1.5%+0.4%+3.8%
Evenly matched — BC and MPX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MPX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ONEW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallMarine Products Corporation (MPX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ONEW vs MBUU vs BC vs MPX vs HZO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ONEW or MBUU or BC or MPX or HZO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, OneWater Marine Inc.

(ONEW) is the stronger pick with 5. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for MarineMax, Inc. (HZO). Marine Products Corporation (MPX) offers the better valuation at 25. 6x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ONEW or MBUU or BC or MPX or HZO?

On trailing P/E, Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the cheapest at 25.

6x versus Malibu Boats, Inc. at 33. 4x. On forward P/E, Marine Products Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ONEW or MBUU or BC or MPX or HZO?

Over the past 5 years, Brunswick Corporation (BC) delivered a total return of -23.

5%, compared to -74. 3% for OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BC returned +96. 4% versus ONEW's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ONEW or MBUU or BC or MPX or HZO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

00β versus MarineMax, Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning HZO is approximately 110% more volatile than MPX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for OneWater Marine Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ONEW or MBUU or BC or MPX or HZO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), OneWater Marine Inc.

(ONEW) is pulling ahead at 5. 6% versus -5. 0% for MarineMax, Inc. (HZO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Malibu Boats, Inc. grew EPS 127. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1751. 3% for OneWater Marine Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ONEW leads at 2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ONEW or MBUU or BC or MPX or HZO?

Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

7% net margin versus -6. 1% for OneWater Marine Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPX leads at 5. 7% versus -0. 7% for BC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HZO leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ONEW or MBUU or BC or MPX or HZO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Marine Products Corporation (MPX) trades at 16.

9x forward P/E versus 45. 0x for MarineMax, Inc. — 28. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBUU: 28. 9% to $32. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ONEW or MBUU or BC or MPX or HZO?

In this comparison, MPX (6.

6% yield), BC (2. 1% yield), ONEW (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. MBUU, HZO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ONEW or MBUU or BC or MPX or HZO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Marine Products Corporation (MPX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

00), 6. 6% yield). OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MPX: +67. 5%, ONEW: -9. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ONEW and MBUU and BC and MPX and HZO?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ONEW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MBUU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HZO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BC, MPX pay a dividend while ONEW, MBUU, HZO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ONEW

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MBUU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MPX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HZO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ONEW and MBUU and BC and MPX and HZO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ONEW: 1.3% · MBUU: 3.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.