REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ORC vs EARN vs AGNC vs EFC vs NLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
ORC vs EARN vs AGNC vs EFC vs NLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | Asset Management | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.05B | $183M | $9.62B | $1.35B | $16.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $202M | $51M | $3.46B | $429M | $6.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $159M | $-5M | $838M | $147M | $2.03B |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 31.3% | 100.0% | 88.6% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 14.0% | 107.1% | 63.0% | 102.6% |
| Forward P/E | 5.9x | 4.6x | 6.9x | 7.5x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $10.24B | $563M | $64M | $16.96B | $111.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $725M | $32M | $505M | $202M | $2.04B |
ORC vs EARN vs AGNC vs EFC vs NLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orchid Island Capit… (ORC) | 100 | 33.3 | -66.7% |
| Ellington Credit Co… (EARN) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| AGNC Investment Cor… (AGNC) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
| Ellington Financial… (EFC) | 100 | 133.2 | +33.2% |
| Annaly Capital Mana… (NLY) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ORC vs EARN vs AGNC vs EFC vs NLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ORC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 20.1%
- PEG 0.12 vs EFC's 0.30
- Beta 0.63, yield 20.1%, current ratio 0.09x
- Lower P/E (5.9x vs 7.5x)
EARN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 0.13x
AGNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 384.7%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.4%
- 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs EARN's -8.4%
- +39.4% vs EARN's +8.0%
EFC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 77.3% 10Y total return vs AGNC's 46.9%
- Beta 0.47 vs AGNC's 0.74
Among these 5 stocks, NLY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs EARN's -8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.9x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 78.5% margin vs EARN's 13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs AGNC's 0.74 | |
| Dividends | 20.1% yield, vs NLY's 13.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs EARN's +8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs EARN's -0.6%, ROIC 2.1% vs 0.7% |
ORC vs EARN vs AGNC vs EFC vs NLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ORC vs EARN vs AGNC vs EFC vs NLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORC leads in 2 of 6 categories
EFC leads 2 • AGNC leads 1 • EARN leads 0 • NLY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.7B annually — 132.1x EARN's $51M. ORC is the more profitable business, keeping 78.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EARN's 13.0%. On growth, ORC holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $202M | $51M | $3.5B | $429M | $6.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $197M | -$5M | $3.7B | $301M | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $159M | -$5M | $838M | $147M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $120M | $20M | $604M | -$925M | -$222M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | +31.3% | +100.0% | +88.6% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +14.0% | +107.1% | +63.0% | +102.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +13.0% | +24.2% | +34.2% | +30.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +59.5% | +18.0% | +17.5% | -2.2% | -3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.3% | — | +2.5% | +123.0% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | -2.1% | +84.6% | -44.0% | +79.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ORC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, ORC trades at a 72% valuation discount to EARN's 20.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ORC offers better value at 0.11x vs EFC's 0.46x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $183M | $9.6B | $1.4B | $16.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.6B | $714M | $9.2B | $18.1B | $125.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.60x | 20.29x | 11.53x | 11.42x | 7.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.91x | 4.62x | 6.87x | 7.47x | 7.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.11x | — | — | 0.46x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.75x | 100.63x | 2.42x | 39.45x | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.87x | 3.61x | 1.97x | 2.00x | 2.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.65x | 0.68x | 0.86x | 0.72x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.75x | 20.07x | 111.86x | 2.66x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGNC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORC delivers a 15.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-3 for EARN. AGNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EFC's 9.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EARN scores 8/9 vs NLY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.1% | -2.8% | +7.3% | +8.4% | +14.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | -0.6% | +0.8% | +0.8% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +0.7% | +34.0% | +3.1% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.1% | +3.7% | +4.9% | +2.7% | +19.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.47x | 2.91x | 0.01x | 9.07x | 6.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.5B | $531M | -$441M | $16.8B | $109.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $725M | $32M | $505M | $202M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.2B | $563M | $64M | $17.0B | $111.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.52x | -0.16x | 1.32x | 1.51x | 1.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EFC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EFC five years ago would be worth $12,153 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,174 for ORC. Over the past 12 months, AGNC leads with a +39.4% total return vs EARN's +8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NLY at 17.0% vs EARN's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.5% | -2.1% | +2.5% | +3.1% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.4% | +8.0% | +39.4% | +18.5% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.9% | +11.7% | +58.3% | +51.9% | +60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.3% | -17.4% | -2.2% | +21.5% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.2% | +31.3% | +46.9% | +77.3% | +35.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.0% | +3.7% | +16.5% | +15.0% | +17.0% |
Risk & Volatility
EFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGNC's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EFC currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs EARN's 80.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.63x | 0.74x | 0.47x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.40 | $6.08 | $12.19 | $14.12 | $24.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.62 | $4.27 | $8.65 | $11.28 | $18.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.7% | +80.1% | +87.9% | +96.2% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 61.4 | 52.1 | 69.7 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.5M | 483K | 18.2M | 1.6M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ORC and NLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ORC as "Hold", EARN as "Hold", AGNC as "Hold", EFC as "Buy", NLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.2% upside for EARN (target: $6) vs -0.7% for EFC (target: $14). For income investors, ORC offers the higher dividend yield at 20.06% vs NLY's 13.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | $6.00 | $11.13 | $13.50 | $24.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 7 | 35 | 13 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +20.1% | +16.8% | +14.7% | +13.6% | +13.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.39 | $0.82 | $1.58 | $1.85 | $2.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
ORC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). EFC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ORC vs EARN vs AGNC vs EFC vs NLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORC or EARN or AGNC or EFC or NLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is the stronger pick with 384. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for Ellington Credit Company (EARN). Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ORC or EARN or AGNC or EFC or NLY?
On trailing P/E, Orchid Island Capital, Inc.
(ORC) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Ellington Credit Company at 20. 3x. On forward P/E, Ellington Credit Company is actually cheaper at 4. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Orchid Island Capital, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Ellington Financial Inc. 's 0. 30x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ORC or EARN or AGNC or EFC or NLY?
Over the past 5 years, Ellington Financial Inc.
(EFC) delivered a total return of +21. 5%, compared to -38. 3% for Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EFC returned +77. 3% versus ORC's -7. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ORC or EARN or AGNC or EFC or NLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ellington Financial Inc.
(EFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus AGNC Investment Corp. 's 0. 74β — meaning AGNC is approximately 58% more volatile than EFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 9% for Ellington Financial Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ORC or EARN or AGNC or EFC or NLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is pulling ahead at 384. 7% versus -8. 4% for Ellington Credit Company (EARN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGNC Investment Corp. grew EPS 1760% year-over-year, compared to -22. 6% for Ellington Credit Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, EFC leads at 150. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ORC or EARN or AGNC or EFC or NLY?
Orchid Island Capital, Inc.
(ORC) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 6% net margin versus 13. 0% for Ellington Credit Company — meaning it keeps 88. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NLY leads at 102. 6% versus 14. 0% for EARN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGNC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ORC or EARN or AGNC or EFC or NLY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Ellington Financial Inc. 's 0. 30x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Ellington Credit Company (EARN) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 7. 5x for Ellington Financial Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EARN: 23. 2% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ORC or EARN or AGNC or EFC or NLY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC) offers the highest yield at 20. 1%, versus 13. 1% for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY).
09Is ORC or EARN or AGNC or EFC or NLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ellington Financial Inc.
(EFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 13. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFC: +77. 3%, AGNC: +46. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ORC and EARN and AGNC and EFC and NLY?
These companies operate in different sectors (ORC (Real Estate) and EARN (Financial Services) and AGNC (Real Estate) and EFC (Real Estate) and NLY (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ORC is a small-cap high-growth stock; EARN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AGNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; EFC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NLY is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.