Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ORIS vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
ORIS vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $307K | $250M | $340.44B | $48.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $3.46B | $1.01T | $130.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-178M | $123.35B | $9.00B |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | 13.6% | 41.2% | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 7.3% | 10.9% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 5.7x | 4.1x | 2.6x |
| Total Debt | $196K | $170M | $248.49B | $79.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $1.29B | $181.73B | $24.83B |
ORIS vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORIENTAL RISE HOLDI… (ORIS) | 100 | 5.4 | -94.6% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 153.3 | +53.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ORIS vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ORIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 24.80x
- Beta 1.22, current ratio 24.80x
- Lower P/E (0.1x vs 2.6x)
CANG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 70.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 83.4% 10Y total return vs BIDU's -17.5%
- 5.9% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
BIDU is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +61.3% vs CANG's -73.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 2.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs CANG's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs CANG's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.3% vs CANG's -73.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 9.6% vs 4.6% |
ORIS vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ORIS vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories
ORIS leads 1 • CANG leads 1 • BIDU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CANG and BABA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 42754.2x ORIS's $24M. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CANG's -5.2%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $3.5B | $1.01T | $130.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $333M | $114.6B | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$178M | $123.4B | $9.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $0 | $2.6B | -$15.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +13.6% | +41.2% | +44.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +7.3% | +10.9% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -5.2% | +12.2% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | -154.0% | +0.3% | -12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +58.3% | +4.8% | -7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -95.7% | +3.6% | -52.0% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ORIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.1x trailing earnings, ORIS trades at a 99% valuation discount to BABA's 17.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BABA's 13.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $307,224 | $250M | $340.4B | $48.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$43M | $85M | $350.3B | $56.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.13x | 5.66x | 17.90x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 4.13x | 2.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -13.33x | 3.13x | 13.55x | 10.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 2.12x | 2.33x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.42x | 2.12x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.10x | — | 29.64x | 25.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CANG. ORIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIDU's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | -4.1% | +11.2% | +3.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | -2.3% | +6.7% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +4.6% | +9.6% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +4.5% | +10.4% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.04x | 0.23x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$43M | -$1.1B | $66.8B | $54.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $1.3B | $181.7B | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $196,000 | $170M | $248.5B | $79.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.00x | -1.87x | 15.74x | 9.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $731 for ORIS. Over the past 12 months, BIDU leads with a +61.3% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.5% vs ORIS's -58.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -67.5% | -62.0% | -9.5% | -6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.3% | -73.7% | +16.0% | +61.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | +1.2% | +74.8% | +14.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | -14.2% | -35.4% | -27.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | -44.9% | +83.4% | -17.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.2% | +0.4% | +20.5% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BABA and BIDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BABA is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIDU currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 2.25x | 1.21x | 1.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.90 | $2.88 | $192.67 | $165.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.06 | $0.33 | $103.71 | $81.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.1% | +18.6% | +73.2% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 58.6 | 61.8 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 904K | 1.3M | 10.4M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", BIDU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 10.6% for BIDU (target: $155). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.27% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.00 | $194.23 | $154.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 59 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $12.14 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% | +3.8% | +1.9% |
BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ORIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ORIS vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORIS or CANG or BABA or BIDU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger pick with 5.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd (ORIS) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ORIS or CANG or BABA or BIDU?
On trailing P/E, ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd (ORIS) is the cheapest at 0.
1x versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited at 17. 9x. On forward P/E, Baidu, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ORIS or CANG or BABA or BIDU?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -92. 7% for ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd (ORIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +83. 4% versus ORIS's -92. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ORIS or CANG or BABA or BIDU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
21β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 86% more volatile than BABA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd (ORIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 28% for Baidu, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ORIS or CANG or BABA or BIDU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is pulling ahead at 5.
9% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -66. 0% for ORIENTAL RISE HOLDINGS Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, BABA leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ORIS or CANG or BABA or BIDU?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus 13. 1% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus 13. 9% for ORIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ORIS or CANG or BABA or BIDU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Baidu, Inc.
(BIDU) trades at 2. 6x forward P/E versus 4. 1x for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459. 2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ORIS or CANG or BABA or BIDU?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ORIS, CANG, BIDU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ORIS or CANG or BABA or BIDU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
21), 1. 3% yield). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BABA: +83. 4%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ORIS and CANG and BABA and BIDU?
These companies operate in different sectors (ORIS (Consumer Defensive) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and BIDU (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
BABA pays a dividend while ORIS, CANG, BIDU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.