Gold
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ORLA vs CAT vs DE vs EGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Gold
ORLA vs CAT vs DE vs EGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Gold |
| Market Cap | $4.85B | $416.75B | $157.32B | $6.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $70.75B | $45.88B | $1.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $138M | $9.42B | $4.08B | $510M |
| Gross Margin | 52.5% | 32.5% | 34.7% | 46.4% |
| Operating Margin | 44.2% | 16.6% | 17.0% | 40.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.9x | 38.8x | 32.5x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $502M | $43.33B | $63.94B | $1.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $576M | $9.98B | $8.28B | $868M |
ORLA vs CAT vs DE vs EGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA) | 100 | 578.5 | +478.5% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 381.5 | +281.5% |
| Eldorado Gold Corpo… (EGO) | 100 | 394.6 | +294.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ORLA vs CAT vs DE vs EGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ORLA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 329.5%, EPS growth 59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 97.0%
- 13.7% 10Y total return vs CAT's 12.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, Low D/E 55.8%, current ratio 1.08x
- 329.5% revenue growth vs DE's -2.2%
CAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +181.5% vs DE's +24.2%
- 10.0% ROA vs DE's 3.9%, ROIC 15.9% vs 7.7%
DE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.56, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.31x
- 1.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs CAT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
EGO is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.29 vs DE's 1.99
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 32.5x), PEG 0.29 vs 1.99
- 28.0% margin vs DE's 8.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 329.5% revenue growth vs DE's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 32.5x), PEG 0.29 vs 1.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.0% margin vs DE's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs CAT's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs CAT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.5% vs DE's +24.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs DE's 3.9%, ROIC 15.9% vs 7.7% |
ORLA vs CAT vs DE vs EGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ORLA vs CAT vs DE vs EGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORLA leads in 2 of 6 categories
EGO leads 1 • CAT leads 1 • DE leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 58.6x ORLA's $1.2B. EGO is the more profitable business, keeping 28.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DE's 8.9%. On growth, ORLA holds the edge at +4.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $70.8B | $45.9B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $699M | $14.0B | $9.5B | $993M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $138M | $9.4B | $4.1B | $510M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$71M | $11.4B | $5.5B | -$184M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.5% | +32.5% | +34.7% | +46.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +16.6% | +17.0% | +40.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +13.3% | +8.9% | +28.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | +16.2% | +12.0% | -10.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | +22.2% | +16.3% | +34.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +30.2% | -24.1% | +134.6% |
Valuation Metrics
EGO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.2x trailing earnings, EGO trades at a 72% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EGO offers better value at 0.49x vs DE's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.9B | $416.8B | $157.3B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $450.1B | $213.0B | $7.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 45.31x | 47.57x | 31.37x | 13.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.87x | 38.79x | 32.53x | 7.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x | 1.92x | 0.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.70x | 33.41x | 20.01x | 6.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.48x | 6.17x | 3.52x | 3.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.63x | 19.71x | 6.06x | 1.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.21x | 40.56x | 48.69x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ORLA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $12 for EGO. EGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DE's 2.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EGO scores 6/9 vs ORLA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.9% | +47.5% | +15.5% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +10.0% | +3.9% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +82.1% | +15.9% | +7.7% | +13.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +48.1% | +19.1% | +11.4% | +13.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 2.03x | 2.46x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$75M | $33.4B | $55.7B | $428M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $576M | $10.0B | $8.3B | $868M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $502M | $43.3B | $63.9B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.56x | 9.22x | 2.74x | 20.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,406 for DE. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs DE's +24.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs DE's 16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | +50.2% | +24.7% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.1% | +181.5% | +24.2% | +66.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +203.0% | +324.9% | +57.4% | +178.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +243.7% | +282.5% | +54.1% | +198.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1372.7% | +1227.6% | +671.0% | +58.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.7% | +62.0% | +16.3% | +40.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ORLA and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ORLA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs EGO's 64.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 1.54x | 0.56x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.98 | $931.35 | $674.19 | $51.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.50 | $318.11 | $433.00 | $17.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.0% | +96.2% | +86.1% | +64.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 76.2 | 54.0 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 2.4M | 1.2M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
DE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ORLA as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", EGO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.9% upside for EGO (target: $53) vs -70.7% for ORLA (target: $4). For income investors, DE offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.18 | $824.80 | $680.54 | $52.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 53 | 46 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.86 | $6.33 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +3.3% |
ORLA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ORLA vs CAT vs DE vs EGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORLA or CAT or DE or EGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Orla Mining Ltd.
(ORLA) is the stronger pick with 329. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) offers the better valuation at 13. 2x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ORLA or CAT or DE or EGO?
On trailing P/E, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) is the cheapest at 13.
2x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Eldorado Gold Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Eldorado Gold Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ORLA or CAT or DE or EGO?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to +54. 1% for Deere & Company (DE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORLA returned +1373% versus EGO's +58. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ORLA or CAT or DE or EGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orla Mining Ltd.
(ORLA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 643% more volatile than ORLA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 2% for Deere & Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ORLA or CAT or DE or EGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Orla Mining Ltd.
(ORLA) is pulling ahead at 329. 5% versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eldorado Gold Corporation grew EPS 78. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORLA leads at 97. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ORLA or CAT or DE or EGO?
Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
9% net margin versus 10. 1% for Orla Mining Ltd. — meaning it keeps 27. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORLA leads at 43. 5% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORLA leads at 48. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ORLA or CAT or DE or EGO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 31. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGO: 58. 9% to $52. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — ORLA or CAT or DE or EGO?
In this comparison, DE (1.
1% yield), CAT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. ORLA, EGO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ORLA or CAT or DE or EGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Orla Mining Ltd.
(ORLA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), +1373% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORLA: +1373%, EGO: +58. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ORLA and CAT and DE and EGO?
These companies operate in different sectors (ORLA (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials) and DE (Industrials) and EGO (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ORLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EGO is a small-cap high-growth stock. CAT, DE pay a dividend while ORLA, EGO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.