ORLA vs EGO vs CDE

For growth investors, Orla Mining Ltd.

(ORLA) is the stronger pick with 212. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 39. 9% for Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO). Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) is the cheapest at 13.

6x versus Orla Mining Ltd. at 48. 5x. On forward P/E, Eldorado Gold Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coeur Mining, Inc. wins at 0. 18x versus Eldorado Gold Corporation's 0. 30x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Orla Mining Ltd.

(ORLA) delivered a total return of +244. 6%, compared to +104. 0% for Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORLA returned +1451% versus EGO's +63. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orla Mining Ltd.

(ORLA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning CDE is approximately 341% more volatile than ORLA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 56% for Orla Mining Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Orla Mining Ltd.

(ORLA) is pulling ahead at 212. 7% versus 39. 9% for Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coeur Mining, Inc. grew EPS 500. 0% year-over-year, compared to 14. 8% for Orla Mining Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORLA leads at 77. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 10. 1% for Orla Mining Ltd. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORLA leads at 43. 5% versus 36. 3% for CDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORLA leads at 48. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 18x versus Eldorado Gold Corporation's 0. 30x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 9. 4x for Coeur Mining, Inc. — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGO: 54. 2% to $52. 67.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Orla Mining Ltd.

(ORLA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), +1451% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORLA: +1451%, CDE: +156. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.