Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OSBC vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FFIN vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
OSBC vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FFIN vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $252M | $203M | $4.61B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $397M | $186M | $90M | $739M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $80M | $27M | $14M | $243M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 78.1% | 69.5% | 54.7% | 70.8% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 17.8% | 7.0% | 36.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 7.2x | 11.8x | 15.9x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $339M | $116M | $52M | $197M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $14M | $119M | $763M | $599M |
OSBC vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FFIN vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old Second Bancorp,… (OSBC) | 100 | 276.4 | +176.4% |
| C&F Financial Corpo… (CFFI) | 100 | 206.6 | +106.6% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 291.2 | +191.2% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSBC vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FFIN vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSBC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 219.4% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- NIM 4.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
CFFI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.4%
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.12 vs 3.05
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs FFIN's 0.95
- +45.6% vs FIS's -35.3%
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- 30.2% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 1.6% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 11.0% vs 2.0%
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs FFIN's 3.05
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.12 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FFIN's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 11.0% vs 2.0% |
OSBC vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FFIN vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OSBC vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FFIN vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CFFI leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • OSBC leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 121.0x CZWI's $90M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $397M | $186M | $90M | $739M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $36M | $9M | $310M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $80M | $27M | $14M | $243M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $119M | $22M | $11M | $290M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.1% | +69.5% | +54.7% | +70.8% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +17.8% | +7.0% | +36.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +14.4% | +16.0% | +30.2% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +11.9% | +11.5% | +39.6% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.6% | +10.7% | +63.0% | -7.7% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CFFI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CFFI trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OSBC offers better value at 1.09x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $252M | $203M | $4.6B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $354M | $136M | $4.0B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.01x | 9.35x | 14.44x | 20.76x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.82x | 7.22x | 11.76x | 15.92x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.09x | 1.45x | 2.85x | 3.98x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.97x | 10.72x | 15.28x | 14.17x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.80x | 1.36x | 2.25x | 6.23x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 0.96x | 1.09x | 2.89x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.43x | 11.38x | 19.55x | 15.73x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFI's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFI scores 8/9 vs OSBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.1% | +10.8% | +7.8% | +13.3% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +6.8% | +2.0% | +11.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +2.1% | +0.6% | +16.0% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.44x | 0.28x | 0.12x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $215M | $102M | -$67M | -$566M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $14M | $119M | $763M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $339M | $116M | $52M | $197M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.78x | 0.73x | 0.16x | 1.48x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFFI five years ago would be worth $19,542 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.9% | +10.3% | +21.5% | +8.5% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.5% | +24.3% | +45.6% | -3.2% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.4% | +66.5% | +160.0% | +29.1% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.8% | +95.4% | +71.2% | -28.2% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.4% | +144.1% | +157.0% | +145.4% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.2% | +18.5% | +37.5% | +8.9% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CFFI and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIN's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFFI currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 0.56x | 0.45x | 0.94x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.43 | $80.99 | $22.62 | $38.74 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.21 | $57.09 | $12.83 | $28.11 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +95.7% | +93.2% | +83.6% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 46.5 | 63.7 | 58.2 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 400K | 4K | 40K | 740K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIN and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OSBC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 12.3% for OSBC (target: $24). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs OSBC's 1.09%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.67 | — | — | $39.25 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | — | 2 | 15 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +2.2% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.23 | $1.84 | $0.37 | $0.72 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.4% | +3.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CFFI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
OSBC vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FFIN vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSBC or CFFI or CZWI or FFIN or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSBC or CFFI or CZWI or FFIN or FIS?
On trailing P/E, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, C&F Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSBC or CFFI or CZWI or FFIN or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) delivered a total return of +95.
4%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OSBC returned +222. 2% versus FIS's -18. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSBC or CFFI or CZWI or FFIN or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning FFIN is approximately 108% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 44% for C&F Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OSBC or CFFI or CZWI or FFIN or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: C&F Financial Corporation grew EPS 37. 9% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSBC or CFFI or CZWI or FFIN or FIS?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OSBC leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSBC or CFFI or CZWI or FFIN or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSBC or CFFI or CZWI or FFIN or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 1% for Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC).
09Is OSBC or CFFI or CZWI or FFIN or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 8% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +161. 7%, FFIN: +144. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSBC and CFFI and CZWI and FFIN and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (OSBC (Financial Services) and CFFI (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OSBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CFFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.