Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OVID vs PTCT vs ACAD vs SRPT vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
OVID vs PTCT vs ACAD vs SRPT vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $355M | $5.35B | $3.86B | $2.18B | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $827M | $1.10B | $2.18B | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-187M | $376M | $65M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 99.2% | 49.7% | 91.5% | 34.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.9% | -8.3% | 7.4% | -1.9% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.3x | 50.9x | 6.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $1M | $492M | $52M | $1.04B | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $985M | $178M | $801M | $357M |
OVID vs PTCT vs ACAD vs SRPT vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ovid Therapeutics I… (OVID) | 100 | 53.4 | -46.6% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 123.6 | +23.6% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
| Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT) | 100 | 15.3 | -84.7% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OVID vs PTCT vs ACAD vs SRPT vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OVID has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 35.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 69.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 10.91x
- Beta 1.45, current ratio 10.91x
- 11.8% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
PTCT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.13
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
- Beta 1.13 vs SRPT's 2.02
ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 34.3% margin vs OVID's -240.1%
- 26.2% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -65.0%
SRPT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, PRAX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs OVID's -240.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs SRPT's 2.02 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs SRPT's -43.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -65.0% |
OVID vs PTCT vs ACAD vs SRPT vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OVID vs PTCT vs ACAD vs SRPT vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PTCT leads in 1 of 6 categories
OVID leads 0 • ACAD leads 0 • SRPT leads 0 • PRAX leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OVID and ACAD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SRPT and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $2.2B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OVID's -2.4%. On growth, OVID holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $827M | $1.1B | $2.2B | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42M | -$37M | $96M | -$6M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$187M | $376M | $65M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$38M | -$229M | $212M | $107M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.2% | +49.7% | +91.5% | +34.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | -8.3% | +7.4% | -1.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -22.6% | +34.3% | +3.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | -27.7% | +19.4% | +4.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.4% | -76.8% | +9.7% | -1.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +192.3% | -100.3% | -81.8% | +162.6% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PTCT and SRPT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 16% valuation discount to ACAD's 9.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $355M | $5.3B | $3.9B | $2.2B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $344M | $4.9B | $3.7B | $2.4B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.38x | 8.29x | 9.85x | -2.92x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 50.91x | 6.93x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.42x | 26.91x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 49.01x | 3.09x | 3.61x | 0.99x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | — | 3.15x | 1.91x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.61x | 36.74x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SRPT's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.0% | — | +35.6% | +4.9% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.6% | -6.8% | +26.2% | +1.9% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.2% | — | +10.0% | -31.4% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.8% | +55.9% | +10.1% | -24.0% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — | 0.04x | 0.91x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$492M | -$126M | $238M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $985M | $178M | $801M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $492M | $52M | $1.0B | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.67x | — | -14.00x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — OVID and PTCT and PRAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $16,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,789 for SRPT. Over the past 12 months, OVID leads with a +816.7% total return vs SRPT's -43.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs SRPT's -45.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +55.1% | -16.0% | -13.7% | -2.4% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +816.7% | +58.2% | +52.4% | -43.4% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.1% | +16.1% | +4.7% | -83.6% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | +60.3% | +7.1% | -72.1% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.7% | +733.2% | -22.9% | +18.0% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.6% | +5.1% | +1.5% | -45.3% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PTCT and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTCT is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SRPT's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs SRPT's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.13x | 1.26x | 2.02x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.10 | $87.50 | $27.81 | $44.14 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $37.94 | $14.45 | $10.42 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.9% | +73.7% | +81.1% | +47.1% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 45.3 | 44.2 | 63.4 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 1.0M | 1.8M | 3.0M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OVID as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", SRPT as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs 18.4% for SRPT (target: $25).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $89.67 | $34.78 | $24.63 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 26 | 37 | 54 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% |
PTCT leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
OVID vs PTCT vs ACAD vs SRPT vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OVID or PTCT or ACAD or SRPT or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ovid Therapeutics Inc.
(OVID) is the stronger pick with 1181% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ovid Therapeutics Inc. (OVID) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OVID or PTCT or ACAD or SRPT or PRAX?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. at 9. 9x. On forward P/E, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OVID or PTCT or ACAD or SRPT or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +60. 3%, compared to -72. 1% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +733. 2% versus OVID's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OVID or PTCT or ACAD or SRPT or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning SRPT is approximately 79% more volatile than PTCT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 91% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OVID or PTCT or ACAD or SRPT or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ovid Therapeutics Inc.
(OVID) is pulling ahead at 1181% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OVID leads at 69. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OVID or PTCT or ACAD or SRPT or PRAX?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -240. 1% for Ovid Therapeutics Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -585. 2% for OVID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OVID leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OVID or PTCT or ACAD or SRPT or PRAX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
(SRPT) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 44. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 63. 3% to $544. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — OVID or PTCT or ACAD or SRPT or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is OVID or PTCT or ACAD or SRPT or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), +733. 2% 10Y return). Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +733. 2%, SRPT: +18. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OVID and PTCT and ACAD and SRPT and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OVID is a small-cap high-growth stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.