Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OZK
Bank OZK

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.34B
5Y Perf.+114.9%
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.29B
5Y Perf.+85.6%
IBOC
International Bancshares Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.56B
5Y Perf.+138.0%
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+24.5%

OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OZK logoOZK
HOMB logoHOMB
IBOC logoIBOC
SFNC logoSFNC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$5.34B$5.29B$4.56B$3.09B
Revenue (TTM)$2.81B$1.45B$1.05B$627M
Net Income (TTM)$715M$458M$418M$-398M
Gross Margin55.4%65.6%78.3%5.8%
Operating Margin33.3%36.0%49.4%-84.2%
Forward P/E8.1x10.8x10.9x10.3x
Total Debt$464M$1.20B$705M$641M
Cash & Equiv.$0.00$910M$536M$380M

OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OZK
HOMB
IBOC
SFNC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Bank OZK (OZK)100214.9+114.9%
Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB)100185.6+85.6%
International Bancs… (IBOC)100238.0+138.0%
Simmons First Natio… (SFNC)100124.5+24.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: OZK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Home Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. IBOC also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OZK
Bank OZK
The Banking Pick

OZK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 28 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 3.6%
  • PEG 0.37 vs HOMB's 3.55
  • Lower P/E (8.1x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.37 vs 0.53
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HOMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 3.6%
  • 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
  • Beta 0.82 vs SFNC's 1.02
Best for: growth exposure
IBOC
International Bancshares Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBOC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 229.3% 10Y total return vs OZK's 63.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
  • Beta 0.83, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.04x
  • NIM 4.0% vs SFNC's 2.9%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation
The Financial Play

SFNC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHOMB logoHOMB9.5% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
ValueOZK logoOZKLower P/E (8.1x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.37 vs 0.53
Quality / MarginsOZK logoOZKEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyHOMB logoHOMBBeta 0.82 vs SFNC's 1.02
DividendsOZK logoOZK3.6% yield, 28-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0%
Momentum (1Y)IBOC logoIBOC+20.1% vs HOMB's -1.9%
Efficiency (ROA)OZK logoOZKEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs SFNC's 0.9%

OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OZKBank OZK

Segment breakdown not available.

HOMBHome Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
52.3%$43M
Deposit Account
47.7%$39M
IBOCInternational Bancshares Corporation
FY 2025
Services charges on deposit accounts
51.7%$74M
Other service charges, commissions and fees Banking
41.0%$59M
Other service charges, commissions and fees, Non-banking
7.3%$10M
SFNCSimmons First National Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
36.8%$51M
Fiduciary and Trust
28.5%$39M
Credit and Debit Card
24.7%$34M
Mortgage Loans
5.9%$8M
Financial Service, Other
4.1%$6M

OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBOCLAGGINGSFNC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IBOC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

OZK is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 4.5x SFNC's $627M. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.

MetricOZK logoOZKBank OZKHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.8B$1.5B$1.1B$627M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.0B$601M$417M-$497M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$715M$458M$418M-$398M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$732M$354M$360M$755M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.4%+65.6%+78.3%+5.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+33.3%+36.0%+49.4%-84.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.5%+27.7%+39.1%-63.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+26.1%+29.1%+47.0%+71.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-1.9%+26.0%-100.0%+42.1%
IBOC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OZK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 7.8x trailing earnings, OZK trades at a 41% valuation discount to HOMB's 13.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OZK offers better value at 0.35x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricOZK logoOZKBank OZKHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Market CapShares × price$5.3B$5.3B$4.6B$3.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.8B$5.6B$4.7B$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.83x13.36x11.07x-7.24x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.14x10.82x10.87x10.35x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.35x4.39x0.54x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.21x10.12x8.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.90x3.64x4.32x4.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.88x1.36x1.40x0.84x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.29x12.53x9.21x6.88x
OZK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — OZK and IBOC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBOC delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. OZK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOMB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OZK scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOZK logoOZKBank OZKHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.9%+10.9%+13.2%-11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.8%+2.0%+3.4%-1.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.6%+7.2%+10.5%-9.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.2%+9.8%+5.4%-4.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97764
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x0.30x0.22x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$464M$292M$168M$261M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$0$910M$536M$380M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$464M$1.2B$705M$641M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.87x1.44x1.91x-1.01x
Evenly matched — OZK and IBOC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IBOC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IBOC five years ago would be worth $16,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, IBOC leads with a +20.1% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBOC at 23.5% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOZK logoOZKBank OZKHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.7%-3.0%+10.7%+14.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+14.6%-1.9%+20.1%+16.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+63.5%+42.0%+88.6%+53.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.7%+6.6%+61.3%-15.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+63.6%+58.2%+229.3%+25.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.8%+12.4%+23.5%+15.3%
IBOC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HOMB and IBOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOZK logoOZKBank OZKHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.99x0.82x0.83x1.02x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$53.66$30.83$75.44$22.18
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$42.37$25.68$61.15$17.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.1%+87.1%+97.1%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.350.359.562.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M1.4M373K1.2M
Evenly matched — HOMB and IBOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — OZK and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: OZK as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", IBOC as "Buy", SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.0% upside for OZK (target: $58) vs 6.1% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs IBOC's 1.91%.

MetricOZK logoOZKBank OZKHOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBOC logoIBOCInternational Ban…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$58.00$32.00$85.00$22.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts221919
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.6%+2.8%+1.9%+4.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2821166
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.76$0.75$1.40$0.85
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.7%+1.6%+0.1%0.0%
Evenly matched — OZK and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IBOC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). OZK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallInternational Bancshares Co… (IBOC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Bank OZK (OZK) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?

On trailing P/E, Bank OZK (OZK) is the cheapest at 7.

8x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Bank OZK is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank OZK wins at 0. 37x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?

Over the past 5 years, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) delivered a total return of +61.

3%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBOC returned +229. 3% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 25% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank OZK (OZK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 30% for Home Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 3. 6% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?

International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.

1% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bank OZK (OZK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 37x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank OZK (OZK) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for International Bancshares Corporation — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OZK: 20. 0% to $58. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 9% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC).

09

Is OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OZK and HOMB and IBOC and SFNC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: OZK is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OZK

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOMB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBOC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 23%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SFNC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform OZK and HOMB and IBOC and SFNC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(OZK: 1.1% · HOMB: 9.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(OZK: 25.5% · HOMB: 27.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(OZK: 7.8x · HOMB: 13.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.