Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $5.34B | $5.29B | $4.56B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.81B | $1.45B | $1.05B | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $715M | $458M | $418M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 65.6% | 78.3% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 36.0% | 49.4% | -84.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 10.8x | 10.9x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $464M | $1.20B | $705M | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $910M | $536M | $380M |
OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank OZK (OZK) | 100 | 214.9 | +114.9% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 238.0 | +138.0% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OZK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 28 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 3.6%
- PEG 0.37 vs HOMB's 3.55
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.37 vs 0.53
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
HOMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 3.6%
- 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
- Beta 0.82 vs SFNC's 1.02
IBOC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 229.3% 10Y total return vs OZK's 63.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.83, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.04x
- NIM 4.0% vs SFNC's 2.9%
SFNC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.37 vs 0.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs SFNC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 28-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.1% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBOC leads in 2 of 6 categories
OZK leads 1 • HOMB leads 0 • SFNC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OZK is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 4.5x SFNC's $627M. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $1.5B | $1.1B | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $601M | $417M | -$497M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $715M | $458M | $418M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $732M | $354M | $360M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +65.6% | +78.3% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +36.0% | +49.4% | -84.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +27.7% | +39.1% | -63.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +29.1% | +47.0% | +71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.9% | +26.0% | -100.0% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
OZK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, OZK trades at a 41% valuation discount to HOMB's 13.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OZK offers better value at 0.35x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $5.3B | $4.6B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $5.6B | $4.7B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.83x | 13.36x | 11.07x | -7.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.14x | 10.82x | 10.87x | 10.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.35x | 4.39x | 0.54x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.21x | 10.12x | 8.69x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.90x | 3.64x | 4.32x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 1.36x | 1.40x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.29x | 12.53x | 9.21x | 6.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — OZK and IBOC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBOC delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. OZK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOMB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OZK scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +10.9% | +13.2% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +2.0% | +3.4% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +7.2% | +10.5% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +9.8% | +5.4% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.30x | 0.22x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $464M | $292M | $168M | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $910M | $536M | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $464M | $1.2B | $705M | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.87x | 1.44x | 1.91x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBOC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBOC five years ago would be worth $16,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, IBOC leads with a +20.1% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBOC at 23.5% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.7% | -3.0% | +10.7% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.6% | -1.9% | +20.1% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.5% | +42.0% | +88.6% | +53.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.7% | +6.6% | +61.3% | -15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.6% | +58.2% | +229.3% | +25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.8% | +12.4% | +23.5% | +15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOMB and IBOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.82x | 0.83x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.66 | $30.83 | $75.44 | $22.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.37 | $25.68 | $61.15 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +87.1% | +97.1% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 50.3 | 59.5 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.4M | 373K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OZK and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OZK as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", IBOC as "Buy", SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.0% upside for OZK (target: $58) vs 6.1% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs IBOC's 1.91%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.00 | $32.00 | $85.00 | $22.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 19 | 1 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +2.8% | +1.9% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 28 | 21 | 16 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.76 | $0.75 | $1.40 | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +1.6% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
IBOC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). OZK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
OZK vs HOMB vs IBOC vs SFNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Bank OZK (OZK) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?
On trailing P/E, Bank OZK (OZK) is the cheapest at 7.
8x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Bank OZK is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank OZK wins at 0. 37x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) delivered a total return of +61.
3%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBOC returned +229. 3% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 25% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank OZK (OZK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 30% for Home Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 3. 6% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank OZK (OZK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 37x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank OZK (OZK) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for International Bancshares Corporation — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OZK: 20. 0% to $58. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 9% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC).
09Is OZK or HOMB or IBOC or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OZK and HOMB and IBOC and SFNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OZK is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.