Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PAR vs TOST vs RSKD vs RLAY vs CTLP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Biotechnology
Information Technology Services
PAR vs TOST vs RSKD vs RLAY vs CTLP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Biotechnology | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $617M | $17.02B | $825M | $2.37B | $826M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $476M | $6.45B | $345M | $11M | $318M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-76M | $412M | $-28M | $-273M | $55M |
| Gross Margin | 40.1% | 26.2% | 51.5% | 66.3% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 5.6% | -9.8% | -27.8% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | 28.3x | 23.7x | 20.8x | — | 27.3x |
| Total Debt | $402M | $40M | $25M | $32M | $49M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $80M | $1.35B | $162M | $84M | $51M |
PAR vs TOST vs RSKD vs RLAY vs CTLP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAR Technology Corp… (PAR) | 100 | 24.3 | -75.7% |
| Toast, Inc. (TOST) | 100 | 58.8 | -41.2% |
| Riskified Ltd. (RSKD) | 100 | 21.2 | -78.8% |
| Relay Therapeutics,… (RLAY) | 100 | 39.7 | -60.3% |
| Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) | 100 | 103.9 | +3.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAR vs TOST vs RSKD vs RLAY vs CTLP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, TOST doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RSKD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 5.03x
- Beta 1.05, current ratio 5.03x
- Lower P/E (20.8x vs 27.3x)
RLAY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 53.4%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 123.2%
- 53.4% revenue growth vs RSKD's 5.2%
- +324.1% vs PAR's -75.6%
CTLP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.38
- 141.9% 10Y total return vs PAR's 167.3%
- 17.3% margin vs RLAY's -25.5%
- Beta 0.38 vs RLAY's 1.77
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.4% revenue growth vs RSKD's 5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.8x vs 27.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs RLAY's -25.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs RLAY's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +324.1% vs PAR's -75.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.4% ROA vs RLAY's -40.1%, ROIC 7.9% vs -37.3% |
PAR vs TOST vs RSKD vs RLAY vs CTLP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PAR vs TOST vs RSKD vs RLAY vs CTLP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTLP leads in 2 of 6 categories
RSKD leads 1 • TOST leads 1 • PAR leads 0 • RLAY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TOST and CTLP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOST is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 603.7x RLAY's $11M. CTLP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RLAY's -25.5%. On growth, TOST holds the edge at +21.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $476M | $6.4B | $345M | $11M | $318M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $409M | -$27M | -$298M | $39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$76M | $412M | -$28M | -$273M | $55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$29M | $654M | $34M | -$213M | $26M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.1% | +26.2% | +51.5% | +66.3% | +39.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | +5.6% | -9.8% | -27.8% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.0% | +6.4% | -8.0% | -25.5% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +10.1% | +9.9% | -20.0% | +8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.4% | +21.9% | +6.2% | -60.9% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.1% | +127.5% | +2.5% | +10.9% | -101.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RSKD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, CTLP trades at a 75% valuation discount to TOST's 52.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTLP's 20.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TOST's 42.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $617M | $17.0B | $825M | $2.4B | $826M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $940M | $15.7B | $687M | $2.3B | $823M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.16x | 52.43x | -26.81x | -7.77x | 13.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.32x | 23.69x | 20.80x | — | 27.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 42.22x | — | — | 20.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 2.77x | 2.39x | 154.15x | 2.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 8.39x | 2.58x | 3.79x | 3.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 27.99x | 24.94x | — | 247.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TOST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTLP delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-44 for RLAY. TOST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAR's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TOST scores 7/9 vs PAR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.1% | +20.7% | -8.4% | -43.9% | +21.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.5% | +13.8% | -6.3% | -40.1% | +14.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.2% | +30.8% | -22.2% | -37.3% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.1% | +15.9% | -7.6% | -42.7% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 0.02x | 0.08x | 0.06x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $323M | -$1.3B | -$137M | -$52M | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $80M | $1.4B | $162M | $84M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $402M | $40M | $25M | $32M | $49M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.71x | — | — | — | 6.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CTLP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTLP five years ago would be worth $10,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,856 for RSKD. Over the past 12 months, RLAY leads with a +324.1% total return vs PAR's -75.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTLP at 18.6% vs PAR's -20.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -58.1% | -13.7% | +0.3% | +52.9% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.6% | -17.4% | +2.0% | +324.1% | +36.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.2% | +51.7% | +2.2% | +15.6% | +66.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.9% | -53.0% | -81.4% | -57.6% | +1.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.3% | -53.0% | -81.4% | -64.3% | +141.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.2% | +14.9% | +0.7% | +5.0% | +18.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CTLP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTLP is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RLAY's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTLP currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs PAR's 20.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 1.44x | 1.05x | 1.77x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $72.15 | $49.66 | $5.68 | $17.31 | $11.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.59 | $24.35 | $3.70 | $2.67 | $7.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.7% | +59.1% | +84.9% | +72.3% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 50.5 | 63.8 | 45.9 | 75.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 9.9M | 763K | 3.1M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAR as "Buy", TOST as "Buy", RSKD as "Buy", RLAY as "Buy", CTLP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.7% upside for RLAY (target: $22) vs -1.8% for CTLP (target: $11).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $39.76 | $5.75 | $21.60 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 29 | 11 | 15 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +0.6% | +12.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CTLP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). RSKD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PAR vs TOST vs RSKD vs RLAY vs CTLP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAR or TOST or RSKD or RLAY or CTLP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Relay Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLAY) is the stronger pick with 53. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for Riskified Ltd. (RSKD). Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (27. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAR or TOST or RSKD or RLAY or CTLP?
On trailing P/E, Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) is the cheapest at 13. 0x versus Toast, Inc. at 52. 4x. On forward P/E, Riskified Ltd. is actually cheaper at 20. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAR or TOST or RSKD or RLAY or CTLP?
Over the past 5 years, Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) delivered a total return of +1. 1%, compared to -81. 4% for Riskified Ltd. (RSKD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAR returned +167. 3% versus RSKD's -81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAR or TOST or RSKD or RLAY or CTLP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Relay Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RLAY is approximately 369% more volatile than CTLP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Toast, Inc. (TOST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 49% for PAR Technology Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAR or TOST or RSKD or RLAY or CTLP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Relay Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLAY) is pulling ahead at 53. 4% versus 5. 2% for Riskified Ltd. (RSKD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toast, Inc. grew EPS 1639% year-over-year, compared to -1392. 9% for PAR Technology Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RLAY leads at 123. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAR or TOST or RSKD or RLAY or CTLP?
Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 3% net margin versus -1800. 6% for Relay Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTLP leads at 7. 4% versus -1971. 6% for RLAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLAY leads at 76. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAR or TOST or RSKD or RLAY or CTLP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Riskified Ltd.
(RSKD) trades at 20. 8x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for PAR Technology Corporation — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RLAY: 72. 7% to $21. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAR or TOST or RSKD or RLAY or CTLP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PAR or TOST or RSKD or RLAY or CTLP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), +141. 9% 10Y return). Relay Therapeutics, Inc. (RLAY) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTLP: +141. 9%, RLAY: -64. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAR and TOST and RSKD and RLAY and CTLP?
These companies operate in different sectors (PAR (Technology) and TOST (Technology) and RSKD (Technology) and RLAY (Healthcare) and CTLP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; TOST is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RSKD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RLAY is a small-cap high-growth stock; CTLP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.