Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $3.34B | $312M | $460M | $2.06B | $467M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.28B | $313M | $953M | $188.60B | $217M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $74M | $-259M | $56M | $12.54B | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 24.7% | 55.4% | 21.4% | 0.2% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | -35.9% | 14.8% | 5.7% | 0.7% |
| Forward P/E | 32.3x | 3.8x | 5.9x | 41.5x | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $437M | $1.05B | $0.00 | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $325M | $116M | $77M | $330M | $67M |
PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paymentus Holdings,… (PAY) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
| Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY) | 100 | 15.6 | -84.4% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 72.5 | -27.5% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 50.2 | -49.8% |
| i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) | 100 | 68.0 | -32.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87
- Rev growth 37.3%, EPS growth 48.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.0%
- -6.9% 10Y total return vs IIIV's 15.2%
- 37.3% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3%
RPAY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (3.8x vs 18.7x)
Among these 5 stocks, PRTH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLYW is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +54.9% vs PAY's -27.9%
IIIV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 1.95x
- Beta 0.85, current ratio 1.95x
- 8.3% margin vs RPAY's -82.7%
- Beta 0.85 vs PRTH's 2.00
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.3% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.8x vs 18.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs RPAY's -82.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs PRTH's 2.00 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.9% vs PAY's -27.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs RPAY's -20.3%, ROIC 21.2% vs -1.0% |
PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAY leads in 2 of 6 categories
IIIV leads 1 • RPAY leads 1 • PRTH leads 1 • FLYW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 869.2x IIIV's $217M. IIIV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPAY's -82.7%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $313M | $953M | $188.6B | $217M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127M | -$10M | $204M | $10.8B | $30M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | -$259M | $56M | $12.5B | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $61M | $75M | -$15.8B | $50M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +55.4% | +21.4% | +0.2% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | -35.9% | +14.8% | +5.7% | +0.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | -82.7% | +5.8% | +6.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +19.4% | +7.9% | -8.4% | +23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.2% | +4.5% | +8.8% | +1408.6% | -8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.5% | -34.4% | +3.1% | +4.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
RPAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 95% valuation discount to FLYW's 156.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 46.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $312M | $460M | $2.1B | $467M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $633M | $1.4B | $1.7B | $408M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 51.23x | -1.18x | 8.26x | 156.64x | 37.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.26x | 3.83x | 5.89x | 41.52x | 18.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.07x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.93x | 7.03x | 6.99x | 46.20x | 12.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.79x | 1.01x | 0.48x | 3.30x | 2.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.15x | 0.63x | — | 2.64x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.63x | 3.42x | 6.13x | 20.81x | 124.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAY delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-47 for RPAY. IIIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RPAY's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAY scores 6/9 vs RPAY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.5% | -46.6% | — | +5.9% | +3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.3% | -20.3% | +2.6% | +4.3% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.2% | -1.0% | +13.4% | +2.1% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.2% | -1.0% | +16.0% | +1.3% | +0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.91x | — | — | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$313M | $321M | $969M | -$330M | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $325M | $116M | $77M | $330M | $67M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $437M | $1.0B | $0 | $8M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -36.81x | 1.51x | 1.84x | 3.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAY five years ago would be worth $9,311 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,703 for RPAY. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +54.9% total return vs PAY's -27.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAY at 49.1% vs RPAY's -17.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.4% | -2.2% | +5.6% | +24.0% | -16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.9% | -9.9% | -16.2% | +54.9% | -21.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +231.3% | -43.5% | +53.6% | -41.8% | -10.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.9% | -83.0% | -13.5% | -50.9% | -32.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.9% | -63.3% | -42.7% | -50.9% | +15.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +49.1% | -17.3% | +15.4% | -16.5% | -3.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and IIIV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IIIV is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs RPAY's 58.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.46x | 2.00x | 1.48x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.43 | $6.06 | $8.89 | $18.05 | $33.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.02 | $2.30 | $4.44 | $9.97 | $19.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.9% | +58.4% | +63.2% | +95.5% | +62.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 49.7 | 60.9 | 83.6 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 495K | 2.0M | 252K | 1.9M | 301K |
Analyst Outlook
PRTH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAY as "Hold", RPAY as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", IIIV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for PRTH (target: $12) vs 8.8% for FLYW (target: $19).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.50 | $5.60 | $12.00 | $18.75 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 17 | 5 | 19 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.4% | +2.2% | +3.8% | +8.1% |
PAY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). IIIV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
(PAY) is the stronger pick with 37. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?
On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus Flywire Corporation at 156. 6x. On forward P/E, Repay Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?
Over the past 5 years, Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
(PAY) delivered a total return of -6. 9%, compared to -83. 0% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIIV returned +15. 2% versus RPAY's -63. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning PRTH is approximately 136% more volatile than IIIV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 91% for Repay Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
(PAY) is pulling ahead at 37. 3% versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -26. 3% for Repay Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAY leads at 34. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?
i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -83. 0% for Repay Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTH leads at 14. 8% versus -3. 9% for RPAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RPAY leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) trades at 3.
8x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 37. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 113. 5% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, i3 Verticals, Inc.
(IIIV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85)). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IIIV: +15. 2%, PRTH: -42. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAY and RPAY and PRTH and FLYW and IIIV?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PAY is a small-cap high-growth stock; RPAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIIV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.