Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PAY
Paymentus Holdings, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.34B
5Y Perf.-12.7%
RPAY
Repay Holdings Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$312M
5Y Perf.-29.8%
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$460M
5Y Perf.-27.5%
FLYW
Flywire Corporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.06B
5Y Perf.-49.8%
IIIV
i3 Verticals, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$467M
5Y Perf.-32.0%

PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PAY logoPAY
RPAY logoRPAY
PRTH logoPRTH
FLYW logoFLYW
IIIV logoIIIV
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$3.34B$312M$460M$2.06B$467M
Revenue (TTM)$1.28B$313M$953M$188.60B$217M
Net Income (TTM)$74M$-259M$56M$12.54B$18M
Gross Margin24.7%55.4%21.4%0.2%58.2%
Operating Margin6.8%-35.9%14.8%5.7%0.7%
Forward P/E32.3x3.8x5.9x41.5x18.7x
Total Debt$11M$437M$1.05B$0.00$8M
Cash & Equiv.$325M$116M$77M$330M$67M

PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PAY
RPAY
PRTH
FLYW
IIIV
StockMay 21May 26Return
Paymentus Holdings,… (PAY)10087.3-12.7%
Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY)10015.6-84.4%
Priority Technology… (PRTH)10072.5-27.5%
Flywire Corporation (FLYW)10050.2-49.8%
i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV)10068.0-32.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PAY and IIIV are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. i3 Verticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. RPAY and FLYW also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PAY
Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

PAY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87
  • Rev growth 37.3%, EPS growth 48.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.0%
  • -6.9% 10Y total return vs IIIV's 15.2%
  • 37.3% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RPAY
Repay Holdings Corporation
The Value Play

RPAY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (3.8x vs 18.7x)
Best for: value
PRTH
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, PRTH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
FLYW
Flywire Corporation
The Momentum Pick

FLYW is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +54.9% vs PAY's -27.9%
Best for: momentum
IIIV
i3 Verticals, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

IIIV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 1.95x
  • Beta 0.85, current ratio 1.95x
  • 8.3% margin vs RPAY's -82.7%
  • Beta 0.85 vs PRTH's 2.00
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPAY logoPAY37.3% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3%
ValueRPAY logoRPAYLower P/E (3.8x vs 18.7x)
Quality / MarginsIIIV logoIIIV8.3% margin vs RPAY's -82.7%
Stability / SafetyIIIV logoIIIVBeta 0.85 vs PRTH's 2.00
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FLYW logoFLYW+54.9% vs PAY's -27.9%
Efficiency (ROA)PAY logoPAY11.3% ROA vs RPAY's -20.3%, ROIC 21.2% vs -1.0%

PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PAYPaymentus Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Payment Transaction Processing Revenue
99.2%$1.2B
Other
0.8%$9M
RPAYRepay Holdings Corporation
FY 2025
Consumer Payments
100.0%$286M
PRTHPriority Technology Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Credit Card, Merchant Discount
74.6%$711M
Money Transmissions Services
16.7%$159M
Outsourced Services And Other Services
7.4%$71M
Product
1.3%$12M
FLYWFlywire Corporation
FY 2025
Transactions
100.0%$503M
IIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
93.7%$149M
Other Revenue
6.3%$10M

PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPAYLAGGINGFLYW

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IIIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 869.2x IIIV's $217M. IIIV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPAY's -82.7%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPAY logoPAYPaymentus Holding…RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$313M$953M$188.6B$217M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$127M-$10M$204M$10.8B$30M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$74M-$259M$56M$12.5B$18M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$132M$61M$75M-$15.8B$50M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.7%+55.4%+21.4%+0.2%+58.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.8%-35.9%+14.8%+5.7%+0.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.8%-82.7%+5.8%+6.6%+8.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.3%+19.4%+7.9%-8.4%+23.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.2%+4.5%+8.8%+1408.6%-8.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+45.5%-34.4%+3.1%+4.0%
IIIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RPAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.3x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 95% valuation discount to FLYW's 156.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 46.2x.

MetricPAY logoPAYPaymentus Holding…RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3.3B$312M$460M$2.1B$467M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.0B$633M$1.4B$1.7B$408M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS51.23x-1.18x8.26x156.64x37.75x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.32.26x3.83x5.89x41.52x18.73x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.07x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.93x7.03x6.99x46.20x12.79x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.79x1.01x0.48x3.30x2.19x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.15x0.63x2.64x1.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.63x3.42x6.13x20.81x124.45x
RPAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PAY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

PAY delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-47 for RPAY. IIIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RPAY's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAY scores 6/9 vs RPAY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPAY logoPAYPaymentus Holding…RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.5%-46.6%+5.9%+3.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.3%-20.3%+2.6%+4.3%+2.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+21.2%-1.0%+13.4%+2.1%+0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.2%-1.0%+16.0%+1.3%+0.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964665
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.91x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$313M$321M$969M-$330M-$59M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$325M$116M$77M$330M$67M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$11M$437M$1.0B$0$8M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-36.81x1.51x1.84x3.55x
PAY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PAY five years ago would be worth $9,311 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,703 for RPAY. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +54.9% total return vs PAY's -27.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAY at 49.1% vs RPAY's -17.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPAY logoPAYPaymentus Holding…RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.4%-2.2%+5.6%+24.0%-16.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.9%-9.9%-16.2%+54.9%-21.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+231.3%-43.5%+53.6%-41.8%-10.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-6.9%-83.0%-13.5%-50.9%-32.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-6.9%-63.3%-42.7%-50.9%+15.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+49.1%-17.3%+15.4%-16.5%-3.5%
PAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLYW and IIIV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IIIV is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs RPAY's 58.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPAY logoPAYPaymentus Holding…RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x1.46x2.00x1.48x0.85x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$40.43$6.06$8.89$18.05$33.97
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.02$2.30$4.44$9.97$19.89
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+65.9%+58.4%+63.2%+95.5%+62.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.949.760.983.655.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded495K2.0M252K1.9M301K
Evenly matched — FLYW and IIIV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PRTH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: PAY as "Hold", RPAY as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", IIIV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for PRTH (target: $12) vs 8.8% for FLYW (target: $19).

MetricPAY logoPAYPaymentus Holding…RPAY logoRPAYRepay Holdings Co…PRTH logoPRTHPriority Technolo…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.50$5.60$12.00$18.75$29.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts101751914
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises003
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+12.4%+2.2%+3.8%+8.1%
PRTH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

PAY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). IIIV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallPaymentus Holdings, Inc. (PAY)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PAY vs RPAY vs PRTH vs FLYW vs IIIV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Paymentus Holdings, Inc.

(PAY) is the stronger pick with 37. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?

On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus Flywire Corporation at 156. 6x. On forward P/E, Repay Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?

Over the past 5 years, Paymentus Holdings, Inc.

(PAY) delivered a total return of -6. 9%, compared to -83. 0% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIIV returned +15. 2% versus RPAY's -63. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), i3 Verticals, Inc.

(IIIV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning PRTH is approximately 136% more volatile than IIIV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 91% for Repay Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Paymentus Holdings, Inc.

(PAY) is pulling ahead at 37. 3% versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -26. 3% for Repay Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAY leads at 34. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?

i3 Verticals, Inc.

(IIIV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -83. 0% for Repay Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTH leads at 14. 8% versus -3. 9% for RPAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RPAY leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) trades at 3.

8x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 37. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 113. 5% to $12. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is PAY or RPAY or PRTH or FLYW or IIIV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, i3 Verticals, Inc.

(IIIV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85)). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IIIV: +15. 2%, PRTH: -42. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PAY and RPAY and PRTH and FLYW and IIIV?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PAY is a small-cap high-growth stock; RPAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIIV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PAY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RPAY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRTH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLYW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 70429%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IIIV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PAY and RPAY and PRTH and FLYW and IIIV on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PAY: 30.2% · RPAY: 4.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.