Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PAYS vs USIO vs PRTH vs RPAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
PAYS vs USIO vs PRTH vs RPAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $369M | $36M | $451M | $307M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $75M | $85M | $953M | $313M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-3M | $56M | $-259M |
| Gross Margin | 59.8% | 23.1% | 21.4% | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | -2.6% | 14.8% | -35.9% |
| Forward P/E | 28.3x | — | 5.8x | 3.9x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $3M | $1.05B | $437M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $7M | $77M | $116M |
PAYS vs USIO vs PRTH vs RPAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) | 100 | 92.9 | -7.1% |
| Usio, Inc. (USIO) | 100 | 57.2 | -42.8% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 294.7 | +194.7% |
| Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY) | 100 | 15.1 | -84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAYS vs USIO vs PRTH vs RPAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 23.5%, EPS growth -42.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
- 26.4% 10Y total return vs USIO's -32.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.52, Low D/E 9.6%, current ratio 1.09x
- 23.5% revenue growth vs RPAY's -1.2%
USIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.60, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.60 vs PRTH's 2.12
PRTH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.12
RPAY is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (3.9x vs 5.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.5% revenue growth vs RPAY's -1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.9x vs 5.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs RPAY's -82.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs PRTH's 2.12 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +188.0% vs PRTH's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs RPAY's -20.3%, ROIC 4.6% vs -1.0% |
PAYS vs USIO vs PRTH vs RPAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PAYS vs USIO vs PRTH vs RPAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAYS leads in 3 of 6 categories
RPAY leads 1 • PRTH leads 1 • USIO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAYS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRTH is the larger business by revenue, generating $953M annually — 12.7x PAYS's $75M. PAYS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPAY's -82.7%. On growth, PAYS holds the edge at +41.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $75M | $85M | $953M | $313M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | -$298,381 | $204M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$3M | $56M | -$259M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $1.08T | $75M | $61M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.8% | +23.1% | +21.4% | +55.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | -2.6% | +14.8% | -35.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | -2.9% | +5.8% | -82.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +12632.5% | +7.9% | +19.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.6% | +8.2% | +8.8% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.2% | -3.3% | +3.1% | -34.4% |
Valuation Metrics
RPAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 92% valuation discount to PAYS's 97.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PAYS's 51.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $369M | $36M | $451M | $307M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $361M | $31M | $1.4B | $629M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 97.81x | -14.04x | 8.10x | -1.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.25x | — | 5.78x | 3.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 51.52x | — | 6.95x | 6.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.33x | 0.43x | 0.47x | 0.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.25x | 1.97x | — | 0.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.44x | 33.67x | 6.01x | 3.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYS delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-47 for RPAY. PAYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RPAY's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAYS scores 7/9 vs USIO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.2% | -13.5% | — | -46.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | -2.2% | +2.6% | -20.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | -12.0% | +13.4% | -1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | -10.4% | +16.0% | -1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.14x | — | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$5M | $969M | $321M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $7M | $77M | $116M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $3M | $1.0B | $437M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -43.10x | 1.51x | -36.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAYS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAYS five years ago would be worth $18,796 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,624 for RPAY. Over the past 12 months, PAYS leads with a +188.0% total return vs PRTH's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAYS at 26.3% vs RPAY's -17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.3% | -5.1% | +3.6% | -3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +188.0% | -9.7% | -10.4% | -7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.5% | -33.8% | +50.5% | -44.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.0% | -78.3% | -15.9% | -83.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2639.9% | -32.8% | -43.8% | -63.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.3% | -12.9% | +14.6% | -17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PAYS and USIO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
USIO is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAYS currently trades 75.6% from its 52-week high vs RPAY's 57.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 0.60x | 2.12x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.88 | $2.02 | $8.89 | $6.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.28 | $1.03 | $4.44 | $2.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.6% | +64.9% | +62.0% | +57.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.9 | 69.0 | 53.4 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 889K | 37K | 252K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
PRTH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAYS as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy", RPAY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.6% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs 34.1% for PAYS (target: $9).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | — | $11.00 | $6.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — | 5 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.9% | +2.3% | +12.5% |
PAYS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RPAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PAYS vs USIO vs PRTH vs RPAY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAYS or USIO or PRTH or RPAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PaySign, Inc.
(PAYS) is the stronger pick with 23. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAYS or USIO or PRTH or RPAY?
On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus PaySign, Inc. at 97. 8x. On forward P/E, Repay Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAYS or USIO or PRTH or RPAY?
Over the past 5 years, PaySign, Inc.
(PAYS) delivered a total return of +88. 0%, compared to -83. 8% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAYS returned +26. 4% versus RPAY's -63. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAYS or USIO or PRTH or RPAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Usio, Inc.
(USIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning PRTH is approximately 253% more volatile than USIO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 91% for Repay Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAYS or USIO or PRTH or RPAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PaySign, Inc.
(PAYS) is pulling ahead at 23. 5% versus -1. 2% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 319. 4% year-over-year, compared to -26. 3% for Repay Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAYS leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAYS or USIO or PRTH or RPAY?
PaySign, Inc.
(PAYS) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -83. 0% for Repay Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRTH leads at 14. 8% versus -3. 9% for RPAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RPAY leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAYS or USIO or PRTH or RPAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) trades at 3.
9x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for PaySign, Inc. — 24. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 99. 6% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAYS or USIO or PRTH or RPAY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PAYS or USIO or PRTH or RPAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Usio, Inc.
(USIO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60)). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (USIO: -32. 8%, PRTH: -43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAYS and USIO and PRTH and RPAY?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PAYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; USIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; RPAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.