Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PB vs CADE vs IBOC vs FFIN vs BOKF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PB vs CADE vs IBOC vs FFIN vs BOKF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $7.05B | $7.85B | $4.56B | $4.61B | $10.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.74B | $2.90B | $1.05B | $739M | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $543M | $530M | $418M | $243M | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 71.9% | 59.3% | 78.3% | 70.8% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 39.9% | 23.3% | 49.4% | 36.8% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 12.1x | 10.9x | 15.9x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.15B | $34M | $705M | $197M | $4.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.75B | $1.73B | $536M | $763M | $1.43B |
PB vs CADE vs IBOC vs FFIN vs BOKF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prosperity Bancshar… (PB) | 100 | 106.2 | +6.2% |
| Cadence Bank (CADE) | 100 | 189.4 | +89.4% |
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 238.0 | +138.0% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PB vs CADE vs IBOC vs FFIN vs BOKF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 3.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 28.2%, current ratio 0.43x
- Beta 0.80, yield 3.4%, current ratio 0.43x
- Beta 0.80 vs CADE's 1.41
CADE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 32.4% NII/revenue growth vs PB's -0.2%
IBOC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 229.3% 10Y total return vs BOKF's 168.5%
- PEG 0.53 vs BOKF's 4.38
- NIM 4.0% vs BOKF's 2.4%
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.53 vs 3.05
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.4% NII/revenue growth vs PB's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.53 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs CADE's 1.41 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% |
PB vs CADE vs IBOC vs FFIN vs BOKF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PB vs CADE vs IBOC vs FFIN vs BOKF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBOC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PB leads 1 • CADE leads 0 • FFIN leads 0 • BOKF leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 4.5x FFIN's $739M. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $2.9B | $1.1B | $739M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $849M | $722M | $417M | $310M | $797M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $543M | $530M | $418M | $243M | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $529M | $508M | $360M | $290M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.9% | +59.3% | +78.3% | +70.8% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +23.3% | +49.4% | +36.8% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +18.0% | +39.1% | +30.2% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +26.7% | +47.0% | +39.6% | +42.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | -6.9% | -100.0% | -7.7% | +1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IBOC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, IBOC trades at a 47% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBOC offers better value at 0.54x vs PB's 88.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.0B | $7.8B | $4.6B | $4.6B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.4B | $6.1B | $4.7B | $4.0B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.14x | 15.20x | 11.07x | 20.76x | 16.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.42x | 12.12x | 10.87x | 15.92x | 13.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 88.43x | 4.01x | 0.54x | 3.98x | 5.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.77x | 7.00x | 8.69x | 14.17x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.05x | 2.70x | 4.32x | 6.23x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 1.40x | 1.40x | 2.89x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.63x | 10.10x | 9.21x | 15.73x | 7.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CADE and FFIN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for PB. CADE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PB scores 8/9 vs BOKF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +8.7% | +13.2% | +13.3% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.0% | +3.4% | +1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +6.7% | +10.5% | +11.0% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +10.4% | +5.4% | +16.0% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.01x | 0.22x | 0.12x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $404M | -$1.7B | $168M | -$566M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $1.7B | $536M | $763M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $34M | $705M | $197M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.42x | 0.66x | 1.91x | 1.48x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CADE and IBOC and BOKF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBOC five years ago would be worth $16,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CADE at 35.0% vs PB's 8.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | -1.8% | +10.7% | +8.5% | +13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.6% | +44.1% | +20.1% | -3.2% | +44.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.7% | +146.0% | +88.6% | +29.1% | +79.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.1% | +52.3% | +61.3% | -28.2% | +59.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.9% | +122.6% | +229.3% | +145.4% | +168.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.5% | +35.0% | +23.5% | +8.9% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PB and IBOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PB is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CADE's 1.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.41x | 0.83x | 0.95x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.20 | $46.74 | $75.44 | $38.74 | $139.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.07 | $29.62 | $61.15 | $28.11 | $91.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +90.1% | +97.1% | +83.6% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 46.7 | 59.5 | 58.2 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 986K | 80.6M | 373K | 740K | 317K |
Analyst Outlook
PB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PB as "Hold", CADE as "Hold", IBOC as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -5.6% for CADE (target: $40). For income investors, PB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.37% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.00 | $39.75 | $85.00 | $39.25 | $131.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 20 | 1 | 15 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +2.3% | +1.9% | +2.2% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 26 | 12 | 16 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.34 | $0.98 | $1.40 | $0.72 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +0.5% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
IBOC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
PB vs CADE vs IBOC vs FFIN vs BOKF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PB or CADE or IBOC or FFIN or BOKF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the stronger pick with 32.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB). International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PB or CADE or IBOC or FFIN or BOKF?
On trailing P/E, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, International Bancshares Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: International Bancshares Corporation wins at 0. 53x versus Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. 's 88. 43x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PB or CADE or IBOC or FFIN or BOKF?
Over the past 5 years, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) delivered a total return of +61.
3%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBOC returned +229. 3% versus PB's +79. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PB or CADE or IBOC or FFIN or BOKF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
(PB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Cadence Bank's 1. 41β — meaning CADE is approximately 76% more volatile than PB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cadence Bank (CADE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PB or CADE or IBOC or FFIN or BOKF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadence Bank (CADE) is pulling ahead at 32.
4% versus -0. 2% for Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for Cadence Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PB or CADE or IBOC or FFIN or BOKF?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PB or CADE or IBOC or FFIN or BOKF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. 's 88. 43x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — PB or CADE or IBOC or FFIN or BOKF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB) offers the highest yield at 3. 4%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is PB or CADE or IBOC or FFIN or BOKF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, CADE: +122. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PB and CADE and IBOC and FFIN and BOKF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CADE is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.