Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PBFS vs NBTB vs TRST vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PBFS vs NBTB vs TRST vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $373M | $2.35B | $858M | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $867M | $278M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $169M | $61M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 72.1% | 67.1% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 37.3% | 25.3% | 29.2% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 19.6x | 10.8x | 16.9x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $327M | $193M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $185M | $51M | $119M |
PBFS vs NBTB vs TRST vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pioneer Bancorp, In… (PBFS) | 100 | 155.9 | +55.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PBFS vs NBTB vs TRST vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PBFS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.67 vs TRST's 4.66
NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- NIM 3.1% vs TRST's 2.6%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7%
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 16.9x), PEG 1.53 vs 4.66
TRST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 26.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs PBFS's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs PBFS's 0.6%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs NBTB's 0.89
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 16.9x), PEG 1.53 vs 4.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs PBFS's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs PBFS's 0.6% |
PBFS vs NBTB vs TRST vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PBFS vs NBTB vs TRST vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories
PBFS leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • TRST leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PBFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.8x PBFS's $88M. TRST is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $867M | $278M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | $241M | $90M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $169M | $61M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $225M | $46M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +72.1% | +67.1% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +25.3% | +29.2% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +19.5% | +22.0% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +25.2% | +16.4% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.4% | +39.5% | +44.1% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 31% valuation discount to PBFS's 19.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PBFS offers better value at 0.67x vs TRST's 4.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $373M | $2.4B | $858M | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $254M | $2.5B | $1000M | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.59x | 13.53x | 14.90x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.80x | 16.87x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | 1.92x | 4.11x | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.73x | 10.35x | 11.14x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.24x | 2.71x | 3.08x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 1.21x | 1.29x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.60x | 10.75x | 18.75x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for PBFS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRST's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +9.5% | +8.9% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +7.9% | +7.2% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +2.4% | +2.8% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$119M | $142M | $142M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $185M | $51M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $327M | $193M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.87x | 1.05x | 0.90x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,523 for PBFS. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +9.3% | +18.2% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.6% | +9.0% | +60.3% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.9% | +54.1% | +88.2% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.2% | +29.9% | +46.5% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.9% | +102.2% | +97.2% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.0% | +15.5% | +23.5% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRST and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.89x | 0.75x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.18 | $46.92 | $49.11 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.09 | $39.20 | $30.17 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +96.1% | +98.6% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 57.3 | 64.5 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 236K | 112K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", TRST as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +3.1% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 8 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.43 | $1.51 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.4% | +4.4% | +3.1% |
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PBFS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
PBFS vs NBTB vs TRST vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PBFS or NBTB or TRST or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PBFS or NBTB or TRST or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 6x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PBFS or NBTB or TRST or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to +25. 2% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus PBFS's +0. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PBFS or NBTB or TRST or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 94% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 28% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PBFS or NBTB or TRST or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrustCo Bank Corp NY grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PBFS or NBTB or TRST or CZWI?
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PBFS leads at 37. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PBFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PBFS or NBTB or TRST or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — PBFS or NBTB or TRST or CZWI?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
2% yield), TRST (3. 1% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PBFS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PBFS or NBTB or TRST or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, PBFS: +0. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PBFS and NBTB and TRST and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PBFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. NBTB, TRST, CZWI pay a dividend while PBFS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.